EIN: 746001505
UEI: H34SSLCPD3M6
Audited by: LOTT, VERNON & COMPANY, P.C.
Cognizant agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on January 27, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 27, 2025 (400 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on January 24, 2024 — management decision was due July 24, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on January 27, 2023 — management decision was due July 27, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on January 25, 2022 — management decision was due July 25, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on January 30, 2021 — management decision was due July 30, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on March 19, 2020 — management decision was due September 19, 2020.
As part of our testing of the Special Education Cluster, a sample of 50 students were selected to review that the District adhered to proper documentation compliance. In our sample, 7 of the students tested had required forms missing from their documentation. These forms included forms such as vision and hearing forms (1 student), records policy approval forms (1 student), initial referral forms (2 students), transfer placement forms (2 students), and ARD signature pages (1 student). In addition, there were 3 students out of the sample of 50 students in which dates were missing from the District?s ?Referral for Special Education Assessment? forms. It was also noted that the District does perform internal reviews on some of the Special Education Student files on a routine basis. However, proper follow-up is not being conducted on identified deficiencies in these files in order to ensure that the deficiency is corrected. Cause: Inconsistent and incomplete record retention in regards to required forms. The forms were either not obtained by District staff or were not kept on hand for review by auditors. Effect or Potential Effect: Without adequate documentation, it is difficult for the District to monitor and ensure compliance with the required Special Education timelines. Questioned Costs: Not Applicable. Recommendation: Ensure that required documentation is obtained, completed in entirety, and kept on hand. In relation to the internal reviews that are performed, we recommend that proper follow-up is conducted until the deficiency is corrected. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2019-001: Significant Deficiency Related to Documentation Compliance Program: Special Education Cluster (IDEA) 84.027 ? IDEA Part B 84.173 ? IDEA Part B Preschool U.S. Department of Education Criteria: The District is responsible for ensuring compliance with all applicable provisions of the Special Education Cluster as prescribed by the U.S. Department of Education. Compliance within Special Education requires schools to accurately maintain documentation for Special Education Students. Condition: As part of our testing of the Special Education Cluster, a sample of 50 students were selected to review that the District adhered to proper documentation compliance. In our sample, 7 of the students tested had required forms missing from their documentation. These forms included forms such as vision and hearing forms (1 student), records policy approval forms (1 student), initial referral forms (2 students), transfer placement forms (2 students), and ARD signature pages (1 student). In addition, there were 3 students out of the sample of 50 students in which dates were missing from the District?s ?Referral for Special Education Assessment? forms. It was also noted that the District does perform internal reviews on some of the Special Education Student files on a routine basis. However, proper follow-up is not being conducted on identified deficiencies in these files in order to ensure that the deficiency is corrected. Cause: Inconsistent and incomplete record retention in regards to required forms. The forms were either not obtained by District staff or were not kept on hand for review by auditors. Effect or Potential Effect: Without adequate documentation, it is difficult for the District to monitor and ensure compliance with the required Special Education timelines. Questioned Costs: Not Applicable. Recommendation: Ensure that required documentation is obtained, completed in entirety, and kept on hand. In relation to the internal reviews that are performed, we recommend that proper follow-up is conducted until the deficiency is corrected. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See corrective action plan.
Corrective Action Plan ? 2019-001: Significant Deficiency Related to Documentation Compliance The following actions to address deficiencies in documentation compliance were implemented prior to the outcome of this audit and in response to our own internal quality controls. ? A new campus position, Facilitator for Special Programs, was allocated to each campus to ensure that local, state, and federal requirements and timelines are met with respect to functions of special programs. The Facilitator?s primary focus is to execute special education procedures and requirements, to include the uploading of required documents. ? The Special Education Coordinators implement a monthly folder audit and report compliance deficiencies to campuses. A documentation spreadsheet is used to track compliance campus by campus. In response to the findings of this audit, the current monthly internal audit process will be expanded (see corrective actions below). ? Special Program Campus Facilitators received 3 days of training prior to this school year and are supported in an ongoing manner through required monthly Facilitator meetings and after-school training. To address campus errors in documentation compliance, the following corrective actions will be implemented: 1. The documentation spreadsheet currently used to track document submission has been reviewed and added to, as needed. 2. Operational Guidelines were reviewed and modified to ensure that documentation requirements are clearly and completely articulated. 3. The time for Special Programs Campus Facilitators to devote to ensuring that local, state, and federal requirements and timelines are met with respect to functions of special programs will be protected. 4. Compliance with document submission requirements will be monitored on a weekly basis. As a campus uploads or submits documents, the documentation spreadsheet will be updated to reflect the submissions. Each week, every campus will receive a copy of their spreadsheet with missing documentation notated. The campus then has five days to upload and submit the missing documentation or schedule an ARD to address the missing documentation. A copy of this weekly spreadsheet will be sent to the principal, the Campus Special Programs Facilitator, the campus?s Executive Director for School Leadership, the Assistant Superintendent for School Leadership, the Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction, and the Executive Director for Special Education. ? The first time that a campus does not correct the deficiency within the 5 days, the principal will provide a written response to the parties identified above as to why the deadline was not met and the internal corrective action that the campus will put in place to ensure future compliance. ? The second time that a campus has deficiencies that are not corrected within the 5 days, the principal and facilitator will be counseled and provided additional training in the deficient area by the district coordinator. The appropriate Executive Director will be notified, in addition to the Executive Director for Special Education and the Assistant Superintendents. Those required to attend the training/counseling session include, but are not limited to, the building principal and the campus facilitator. Those responsible will also receive a ?below expectation? rating on the identifiers linked to this noncompliance on the staff member?s annual evaluation. ? The third incident of noncompliance will result in a face-to-face corrective action meeting with the following in attendance: campus principal, campus facilitator, the appropriate Executive Director, the Executive Director or Director for Special Education, the appropriate Special Education Coordinator, the Assistant Superintendents and/or the Deputy Superintendent. Those responsible will receive an ?unsatisfactory? rating on the identifiers linked to this noncompliance on the staff member?s annual evaluation. ? The corrective actions will be communicated to all campus principals and facilitators through a required meeting. To address district errors in documentation compliance, the following correction actions will be implemented: 1. The documentation spreadsheet currently used to track document submission has been reviewed and added to, as needed. 2. Operational Guidelines were reviewed and modified to ensure that documentation requirements are clearly and completely articulated. 3. Compliance with document submission requirements will be monitored on a weekly basis. As district evaluation staff upload or submit documents, the documentation spreadsheet will be updated to reflect the submissions. Each week, every district evaluation staff member will receive a copy of their spreadsheet with missing documentation notated. The evaluation staff member then has five days to upload and submit the missing documentation or schedule an ARD to address the missing documentation. A copy of this weekly spreadsheet will be sent to the Executive Director for Special Education, the Director for Special Education, and the District Coordinator for Special Education. ? The first time that a district evaluation staff member does not correct the deficiency within the 5 days, the evaluating staff member will provide a written response to the parties identified above as to why the deadline was not met and the internal corrective action that the staff member will put in place to ensure future compliance. ? The second time that an evaluation staff member has deficiencies that are not corrected within the 5 days, the evaluating staff member will be counseled and provided additional training in the deficient area by the district coordinator. The Executive Director for Special Education, the Director for Special Education, and the Assistant Superintendents will be notified. The Executive Director for Special Education and Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction will be notified. Those responsible will also receive a ?below expectation? rating on the identifiers linked to this noncompliance on the staff member?s annual evaluation. ? The third incident of noncompliance will result in a face-to-face corrective action meeting with the following in attendance: The Executive Director or Director for Special Education, the appropriate Special Education Coordinator, the Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction and/or the Deputy Superintendent. Those responsible will receive an ?unsatisfactory? rating on the identifiers linked to this noncompliance on the staff member?s annual evaluation. ? The corrective actions will be communicated to the district evaluation staff through a required meeting. Estimated Completion Date: This process will be ongoing. The Corrective Action will begin February 1st in order to communicate to campuses administration/district personnel the corrective action plans and to provide an opportunity to correct and update all existing files. Management Contact: Janice Peronto, Executive Director for Special Education Status: In process
FAC accepted this audit on January 22, 2019 — management decision was due July 22, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on January 11, 2018 — management decision was due July 11, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on January 25, 2017 — management decision was due July 25, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Texas →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.