HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF BEAUMONLocal Government

EIN: 746000290

UEI: GXAJNUGF32B4

Audited by: Novogradac & Company, LLP

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF BEAUMON10 audit years9 findings2 repeat
10
Audit Years
9
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings

FY 2025-09-30

$22,834,836 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on June 29, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 29, 2026 (123 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-09-30

$32,015,001 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 14, 2025 — management decision was due November 14, 2025.

FY 2023-09-30

$47,577,304 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 4, 2024 — management decision was due December 4, 2024.

2023-001
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2022-001QUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

Based upon inspection of the Authority’s files and on discussion with management, there were documents that were unavailable for examination at the time of audit. Context: There are approximately 1,782 units. Of a sample size of thirty-one (31) tenant files, the following was noted: - HUD 50058 Form was missing in 1 file - Verification of income and assets was missing in 1 file. Our sample size is statistically valid. Known Questioned Costs: $2,694 Cause: There is a significant deficiency in internal controls over the compliance for the eligibility type of compliance related to the maintenance of tenant files. The Authority has not properly considered, designed, implemented, maintained and monitored a system of internal controls that assures the program is in compliance. Effect: The Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program is in non-compliance with the eligibility type of compliance related to the maintenance of tenant files. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement internal control procedures that will assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement. Authority Response: The Authority accepts the recommendation of the auditor. The affected files relate to clients that have been on the program for decades and as files get large, archiving takes place. To correct this finding, a directive will be issued to staff that will ensure that when files are archived the original application must be placed in the current working file going forward.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program Titles: Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program Federal Catalog Numbers: 14.871 Noncompliance – E. Eligibility – Tenant Files Non Compliance Material to the Financial Statements: No Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance for Eligibility Criteria: Tenant Files. The PHA must do the following: As a condition of admission or continued occupancy, require the tenant and other family member to provide necessary information, documentation, and releases for the PHA to verify income eligibility (24 CFR sections 5.230, 5.609, and 982.516). These files are required to be maintained and available for examination at the time of audit. Condition: Based upon inspection of the Authority’s files and on discussion with management, there were documents that were unavailable for examination at the time of audit. Context: There are approximately 1,782 units. Of a sample size of thirty-one (31) tenant files, the following was noted: - HUD 50058 Form was missing in 1 file - Verification of income and assets was missing in 1 file. Our sample size is statistically valid. Known Questioned Costs: $2,694 Cause: There is a significant deficiency in internal controls over the compliance for the eligibility type of compliance related to the maintenance of tenant files. The Authority has not properly considered, designed, implemented, maintained and monitored a system of internal controls that assures the program is in compliance. Effect: The Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program is in non-compliance with the eligibility type of compliance related to the maintenance of tenant files. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement internal control procedures that will assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement. Authority Response: The Authority accepts the recommendation of the auditor. The affected files relate to clients that have been on the program for decades and as files get large, archiving takes place. To correct this finding, a directive will be issued to staff that will ensure that when files are archived the original application must be placed in the current working file going forward.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2023-001: Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Titles: Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program Federal Catalog Numbers: 14.871 Noncompliance – E. Eligibility – Tenant Files Non Compliance Material to the Financial Statements: No Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance for Eligibility Criteria: Tenant Files. The PHA must do the following: As a condition of admission or continued occupancy, require the tenant and other family member to provide necessary information, documentation, and releases for the PHA to verify income eligibility (24 CFR sections 5.230, 5.609, and 982.516). These files are required to be maintained and available for examination at the time of audit. Condition: Based upon inspection of the Authority’s files and on discussion with management, there were documents that were unavailable for examination at the time of audit. Context: There are approximately 1,782 units. Of a sample size of thirty-one (31) tenant files, the following was noted: • HUD 50058 Form was missing in 1 file • Verification of income and assets was missing in 1 file. Our sample size is statistically valid. Cause: There is a significant deficiency in internal controls over the compliance for the eligibility type of compliance related to the maintenance of tenant files. The Authority has not properly considered, designed, implemented, maintained and monitored a system of internal controls that assures the program is in compliance. Effect: The Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program is in non-compliance with the eligibility type of compliance related to the maintenance of tenant files. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement internal control procedures that will assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The Authority accepts the recommendation of the auditor. The affected files relate to clients that have been on the program for decades and as files get large, archiving takes place. To correct this finding, a directive will be issued to staff that will ensure that when files are archived the original application must be placed in the current working file going forward. Allison Landrum, Chief Executive Officer, is responsible for implementing this corrective action by September 30, 2024.

Prior Finding References

2022-001

About Eligibility →
2023-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

Based upon inspection of the Authority’s files and on discussion with management, there were failed inspections that did not pass reinspection within 30 days without penalty. Context: There are approximately 489 units with failed inspections. Of a sample size of twenty-five (25) failed inspections, two (2) failed inspections did not pass reinspection within 30 days. HAP was not abated nor was the tenant evicted. Our sample size is statistically valid. Known Questioned Costs: $387 Cause: There is a significant deficiency in internal controls over the compliance for the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to HQS inspections. The Authority has not properly performed HQS inspections in compliance with program requirements following the expiration of HUD waivers as a result of insufficient staffing . Effect: The Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program is in non-compliance with the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to HQS inspections. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement a corrective action plan that will assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement. Authority Response: The Authority accepts the recommendation of the auditor. The affected files relate to the software conversion from HAB to Yardi. The Authority has completed the software conversion, and this should not be an issue going forward.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2023-002: Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Titles: Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program Federal Catalog Numbers: 14.871 Noncompliance – N. Special Tests and Provisions - Housing Quality Standards Non Compliance Material to the Financial Statements: No Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance for Special Tests and Provisions Criteria: Housing Quality Standards Inspections. The PHA must inspect the unit leased to a family at least annually to determine if the unit meets the Housing Quality Standards (HQS) and the PHA must conduct quality control re-inspections. The PHA must prepare a unit inspection report (24 CFR sections 982.158(d) and 982.405(b)). For units that fail inspection the PHA must correct all life threatening HQS deficiencies within 24 hours and all other deficiencies within 30 days. Condition: Based upon inspection of the Authority’s files and on discussion with management, there were failed inspections that did not pass reinspection within 30 days without penalty. Context: There are approximately 489 units with failed inspections. Of a sample size of twenty-five (25) failed inspections, two (2) failed inspections did not pass reinspection within 30 days. HAP was not abated nor was the tenant evicted. Our sample size is statistically valid. Known Questioned Costs: $387 Cause: There is a significant deficiency in internal controls over the compliance for the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to HQS inspections. The Authority has not properly performed HQS inspections in compliance with program requirements following the expiration of HUD waivers as a result of insufficient staffing . Effect: The Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program is in non-compliance with the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to HQS inspections. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement a corrective action plan that will assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement. Authority Response: The Authority accepts the recommendation of the auditor. The affected files relate to the software conversion from HAB to Yardi. The Authority has completed the software conversion, and this should not be an issue going forward.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2023-002 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Titles: Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Programs Federal Catalog Numbers: 14.871 Noncompliance – N. Special Tests and Provisions - Housing Quality Standards Non Compliance Material to the Financial Statements: No Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance for Special Tests and Provisions Criteria: Housing Quality Standards Inspections. The PHA must inspect the unit leased to a family at least annually to determine if the unit meets the Housing Quality Standards (HQS) and the PHA must conduct quality control re-inspections. The PHA must prepare a unit inspection report (24 CFR sections 982.158(d) and 982.405(b)). For units that fail inspection the PHA must correct all life threatening HQS deficiencies within 24 hours and all other deficiencies within 30 days. Condition: Based upon inspection of the Authority’s files and on discussion with management, there were failed inspections that did not pass reinspection within 30 days without penalty. Context: There are approximately 489 units with failed inspections. Of a sample size of twenty-five (25) failed inspections, two (2) failed inspections did not pass reinspection within 30 days. HAP was not abated nor was the tenant evicted. Our sample size is statistically valid. Cause: There is a significant deficiency in internal controls over the compliance for the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to HQS inspections. The Authority has not properly performed HQS inspections in compliance with program requirements following the expiration of HUD waivers as a result of insufficient staffing. Effect: The Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program is in non-compliance with the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to HQS inspections. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement a corrective action plan that will assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The Authority accepts the recommendation of the auditor. The Authority will increase oversight in the Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers program to ensure that established internal control policies are being followed on a timely basis. Allison Landrum, Chief Executive Officer, is responsible for implementing this corrective action by September 30, 2024.

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2023-003
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2022-001QUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

Based upon inspection of the Authority’s files and on discussion with management, there were documents that were unavailable for examination at the time of audit. Context: Of a sample size of thirty-one (31) tenant files, the following information was unavailable for examination at the time of audit: - Annual inspection reports were missing in one file. Our sample size is statistically valid. Known Questioned Costs: $5,319 Cause: There is a significant deficiency in internal controls over the compliance for the eligibility type of compliance related to the maintenance of tenant files. The Authority has not properly considered, designed, implemented, maintained and monitored a system of internal controls that reasonably assures the program is in compliance. Effect: The Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program is in non-compliance with the special tests and provisions - housing quality standards type of compliance related to the maintenance of tenant files. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement internal control procedures that will reasonably assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement. Authority Response: The Authority accepts the recommendation of the auditor. The Authority will increase oversight in the Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program to ensure that established internal control policies are being followed on a timely basis.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2023-003: Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Titles: Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program Federal Catalog Numbers: 14.871 Noncompliance – N. Special Tests and Provisions - Housing Quality Standards Non Compliance Material to the Financial Statements: No Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance for Special Tests and Provisions. occupancy, require the tenant and other family member to provide necessary information, documentation, and releases for the PHA to verify income eligibility (24 CFR sections 5.230, 5.609, and 982.516). These files are required to be maintained and available for examination at the time of audit. Condition: Based upon inspection of the Authority’s files and on discussion with management, there were documents that were unavailable for examination at the time of audit. Context: Of a sample size of thirty-one (31) tenant files, the following information was unavailable for examination at the time of audit: - Annual inspection reports were missing in one file. Our sample size is statistically valid. Known Questioned Costs: $5,319 Cause: There is a significant deficiency in internal controls over the compliance for the eligibility type of compliance related to the maintenance of tenant files. The Authority has not properly considered, designed, implemented, maintained and monitored a system of internal controls that reasonably assures the program is in compliance. Effect: The Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program is in non-compliance with the special tests and provisions - housing quality standards type of compliance related to the maintenance of tenant files. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement internal control procedures that will reasonably assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement. Authority Response: The Authority accepts the recommendation of the auditor. The Authority will increase oversight in the Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program to ensure that established internal control policies are being followed on a timely basis.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2023-003 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Titles: Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program Federal Catalog Numbers: 14.871 Noncompliance – N. Special Tests and Provisions - Housing Quality Standards Non Compliance Material to the Financial Statements: No Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance for Special Tests and Provisions Criteria: Tenant Files. The PHA must do the following: As a condition of admission or continued occupancy, require the tenant and other family member to provide necessary information, documentation, and releases for the PHA to verify income eligibility (24 CFR sections 5.230, 5.609, and 982.516). These files are required to be maintained and available for examination at the time of audit. Condition: Based upon inspection of the Authority’s files and on discussion with management, there were documents that were unavailable for examination at the time of audit. Context: Of a sample size of thirty-one (31) tenant files, the following information was unavailable for examination at the time of audit: Annual inspection reports were missing in one file. Our sample size is statistically valid. Cause: There is a significant deficiency in internal controls over the compliance for the eligibility type of compliance related to the maintenance of tenant files. The Authority has not properly considered, designed, implemented, maintained and monitored a system of internal controls that reasonably assures the program is in compliance. Effect: The Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers program is in non-compliance with the special tests and provisions - housing quality standards type of compliance related to the maintenance of tenant files. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement internal control procedures that will reasonably assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The Authority accepts the recommendation of the auditor. The Authority will increase oversight in the Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers program to ensure that established internal control policies are being followed on a timely basis. Allison Landrum, Chief Executive Officer, is responsible for implementing this corrective action by September 30, 2024.

Prior Finding References

2022-001

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2022-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$18,679,962 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on July 13, 2023 — management decision was due January 13, 2024.

2022-001
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Based upon inspection of the Authority?s files and on discussion with management, there were documents that were unavailable for examination at the time of audit. Context: There are approximately 1,805 units. Of a sample size of thirty-one (31) tenant files, the following was noted: ? Annual inspection report was missing in 1 file ? HUD 50058 Form was missing in 1 file ? Verification of income and assets was missing in 1 file. Our sample size is statistically valid. Cause: There is a significant deficiency in internal controls over the compliance for the eligibility type of compliance related to the maintenance of tenant files. The Authority has not properly considered, designed, implemented, maintained and monitored a system of internal controls that assures the program is in compliance. Effect: The Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program is in non-compliance with the eligibility type of compliance related to the maintenance of tenant files. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement internal control procedures that will assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement. Authority Response: The Authority accepts the recommendation of the auditor. The affected files relate to clients that have been on the program for decades and as files get large, archiving takes place. To correct this finding, a directive will be issued to staff that will ensure that when files are archived the original application must be placed in the current working file going forward.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-001: Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Titles: Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program Federal Catalog Numbers: 14.871 Noncompliance ? E. Eligibility ? Tenant Files Non Compliance Material to the Financial Statements: No Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance for Eligibility Criteria: Tenant Files. The PHA must do the following: As a condition of admission or continued occupancy, require the tenant and other family member to provide necessary information, documentation, and releases for the PHA to verify income eligibility (24 CFR sections 5.230, 5.609, and 982.516). These files are required to be maintained and available for examination at the time of audit. Condition: Based upon inspection of the Authority?s files and on discussion with management, there were documents that were unavailable for examination at the time of audit. Context: There are approximately 1,805 units. Of a sample size of thirty-one (31) tenant files, the following was noted: ? Annual inspection report was missing in 1 file ? HUD 50058 Form was missing in 1 file ? Verification of income and assets was missing in 1 file. Our sample size is statistically valid. Cause: There is a significant deficiency in internal controls over the compliance for the eligibility type of compliance related to the maintenance of tenant files. The Authority has not properly considered, designed, implemented, maintained and monitored a system of internal controls that assures the program is in compliance. Effect: The Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program is in non-compliance with the eligibility type of compliance related to the maintenance of tenant files. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement internal control procedures that will assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement. Authority Response: The Authority accepts the recommendation of the auditor. The affected files relate to clients that have been on the program for decades and as files get large, archiving takes place. To correct this finding, a directive will be issued to staff that will ensure that when files are archived the original application must be placed in the current working file going forward.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2022-001 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Titles: Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program Federal Catalog Numbers: 14.871 Noncompliance ? E. Eligibility ? Tenant Files Non Compliance Material to the Financial Statements: No Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance for Eligibility. Criteria: Tenant Files. The PHA must do the following: As a condition of admission or continued occupancy, require the tenant and other family member to provide necessary information, documentation, and releases for the PHA to verify income eligibility (24 CFR sections 5.230, 5.609, and 982.516). These files are required to be maintained and available for examination at the time of audit. Condition: Based upon inspection of the Authority?s files and on discussion with management, there were documents that were unavailable for examination at the time of audit. Context: There are approximately 1,805 units. Of a sample size of thirty-one (31) tenant files, the following was noted: ? Annual inspection report was missing in 1 file ? HUD 50058 Form was missing in 1 file ? Verification of income and assets was missing in 1 file. Our sample size is statistically valid. Cause: There is a significant deficiency in internal controls over the compliance for the eligibility type of compliance related to the maintenance of tenant files. The Authority has not properly considered, designed, implemented, maintained and monitored a system of internal controls that assures the program is in compliance. Effect: The Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program is in non-compliance with the eligibility type of compliance related to the maintenance of tenant files. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement internal control procedures that will assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The Authority accepts the recommendation of the auditor. The affected files relate to clients that have been on the program for decades and as files get large, archiving takes place. To correct this finding, a directive will be issued to staff that will ensure that when files are archived the original application must be placed in the current working file going forward. Allison Landrum, Chief Executive Officer, is responsible for implementing this corrective action by September 30, 2023.

About Eligibility →
2022-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Based upon inspection of the Authority?s files and on discussion with management, there were failed inspections that did not pass reinspection within 30 days without penalty. Context: There are approximately 489 units with failed inspections. Of a sample size of twenty-five (25) failed inspections, three (3) failed inspections did not pass reinspection within 30 days. HAP was not abated nor was the tenant evicted. Our sample size is statistically valid. Cause: There is a significant deficiency in internal controls over the compliance for the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to HQS inspections. The Authority has not properly performed HQS inspections in compliance with program requirements following the expiration of HUD waivers as a result of insufficient staffing . Effect: The Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program is in non-compliance with the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to HQS inspections. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement a corrective action plan that will assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement. Authority Response: The Authority accepts the recommendation of the auditor. The affected files relate to the software conversion from HAB to Yardi. The Authority has completed the software conversion, and this should not be an issue going forward.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-002: Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Titles: Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Programs Federal Catalog Numbers: 14.871 Noncompliance ? N. Special Tests and Provisions - Housing Quality Standards Non Compliance Material to the Financial Statements: No Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance for Special Tests and Provisions Criteria: Housing Quality Standards Inspections. The PHA must inspect the unit leased to a family at least annually to determine if the unit meets the Housing Quality Standards (HQS) and the PHA must conduct quality control re-inspections. The PHA must prepare a unit inspection report (24 CFR sections 982.158(d) and 982.405(b)). For units that fail inspection the PHA must correct all life threatening HQS deficiencies within 24 hours and all other deficiencies within 30 days. Condition: Based upon inspection of the Authority?s files and on discussion with management, there were failed inspections that did not pass reinspection within 30 days without penalty. Context: There are approximately 489 units with failed inspections. Of a sample size of twenty-five (25) failed inspections, three (3) failed inspections did not pass reinspection within 30 days. HAP was not abated nor was the tenant evicted. Our sample size is statistically valid. Cause: There is a significant deficiency in internal controls over the compliance for the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to HQS inspections. The Authority has not properly performed HQS inspections in compliance with program requirements following the expiration of HUD waivers as a result of insufficient staffing . Effect: The Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program is in non-compliance with the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to HQS inspections. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement a corrective action plan that will assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement. Authority Response: The Authority accepts the recommendation of the auditor. The affected files relate to the software conversion from HAB to Yardi. The Authority has completed the software conversion, and this should not be an issue going forward.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2022-002 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Titles: Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Programs Federal Catalog Numbers: 14.871 Noncompliance ? N. Special Tests and Provisions - Housing Quality Standards Non Compliance Material to the Financial Statements: No Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance for Special Tests and Provisions Criteria: Housing Quality Standards Inspections. The PHA must inspect the unit leased to a family at least annually to determine if the unit meets the Housing Quality Standards (HQS) and the PHA must conduct quality control re-inspections. The PHA must prepare a unit inspection report (24 CFR sections 982.158(d) and 982.405(b)). For units that fail inspection the PHA must correct all life threatening HQS deficiencies within 24 hours and all other deficiencies within 30 days. Condition: Based upon inspection of the Authority?s files and on discussion with management, there were failed inspections that did not pass reinspection within 30 days without penalty. Context: There are approximately 489 units with failed inspections. Of a sample size of twenty-five (25) failed inspections, three (3) failed inspections did not pass reinspection within 30 days. HAP was not abated nor was the tenant evicted. Our sample size is statistically valid. Cause: There is a significant deficiency in internal controls over the compliance for the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to HQS inspections. The Authority has not properly performed HQS inspections in compliance with program requirements following the expiration of HUD waivers as a result of insufficient staffing. Effect: The Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program is in non-compliance with the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to HQS inspections. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement a corrective action plan that will assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The Authority accepts the recommendation of the auditor. The affected files relate to the software conversion from HAB to Yardi. BHA has completed the software conversion, and this should not be an issue going forward. Allison Landrum, Chief Executive Officer, is responsible for implementing this corrective action by September 30, 2023.

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2022-003
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Based upon inspection of the Authority?s files and on discussion with management, there were properties that the Authority owns and insures that did not have DOTs on file during the time of audit. Context: The Authority owns six (6) public housing properties. During the audit, it was noted that two (2) out of six (6) public housing properties did not have DOTs on file. Cause: There is a significant deficiency in internal controls over the compliance for the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to the recording of DOTs against public housing property. The Authority has not properly filed DOTs in compliance with program requirements. Effect: The Public and Indian Housing Program is in non-compliance with the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to the recording of DOTs against public housing property. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement a corrective action plan that will assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement. Authority Response: The Authority accepts the recommendation of the auditor, and will design and implement internal controls over compliance in order to ensure all necessary DOTs are recorded.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program Titles: Public and Indian Housing Program Federal Catalog Numbers: 14.850 Noncompliance ? N. Special Tests and Provisions - Recording of Declarations of Trust/Declaration of Restrictive Covenants Against Public Housing Property Non Compliance Material to the Financial Statements: No Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance for Special Tests and Provisions Criteria: A current Declaration of Trust ("DOT"), in a form acceptable to HUD, must be recorded against all public housing property owned by PHAs (or private entities for public housing developed under 24 CFR Part 905, Subpart F) that has been acquired, developed, maintained, or assisted with funds from the US Housing Act of 1937. A DOT is a legal instrument that grants HUD an interest in public housing property. Condition: Based upon inspection of the Authority?s files and on discussion with management, there were properties that the Authority owns and insures that did not have DOTs on file during the time of audit. Context: The Authority owns six (6) public housing properties. During the audit, it was noted that two (2) out of six (6) public housing properties did not have DOTs on file. Cause: There is a significant deficiency in internal controls over the compliance for the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to the recording of DOTs against public housing property. The Authority has not properly filed DOTs in compliance with program requirements. Effect: The Public and Indian Housing Program is in non-compliance with the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to the recording of DOTs against public housing property. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement a corrective action plan that will assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement. Authority Response: The Authority accepts the recommendation of the auditor, and will design and implement internal controls over compliance in order to ensure all necessary DOTs are recorded.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2022-003 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Titles: Public and Indian Housing Program Federal Catalog Numbers: 14.850 Noncompliance ? N. Special Tests and Provisions - Recording of Declarations of Trust/Declaration of Restrictive Covenants Against Public Housing Property Non Compliance Material to the Financial Statements: No Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance for Special Tests and Provisions Criteria: A current Declaration of Trust ("DOT"), in a form acceptable to HUD, must be recorded against all public housing property owned by PHAs (or private entities for public housing developed under 24 CFR Part 905, Subpart F) that has been acquired, developed, maintained, or assisted with funds from the US Housing Act of 1937. A DOT is a legal instrument that grants HUD an interest in public housing property. Condition: Based upon inspection of the Authority?s files and on discussion with management, there were properties that the Authority owns and insures that did not have DOTs on file during the time of audit. Context: The Authority owns six (6) public housing properties. During the audit, it was noted that two (2) out of six (6) public housing properties did not have DOTs on file. Cause: There is a significant deficiency in internal controls over the compliance for the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to the recording of DOTs against public housing property. The Authority has not properly filed DOTs in compliance with program requirements. Effect: The Public and Indian Housing Program is in non-compliance with the special tests and provisions type of compliance related to the recording of DOTs against public housing property. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement a corrective action plan that will assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action: The Authority accepts the recommendation of the auditor and will design and implement internal controls over compliance in order to ensure all necessary DOTs are recorded. Allison Landrum, Chief Executive Officer, is responsible for implementing this corrective action by September 30, 2023.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2021-09-30

$17,253,182 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 3, 2022 — management decision was due October 3, 2022.

FY 2020-09-30

$18,090,927 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 24, 2021 — management decision was due November 24, 2021.

FY 2019-09-30

$14,788,041 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on July 30, 2020 — management decision was due January 30, 2021.

2019-001
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Out of a total tenant population of approximately 280 tenants, 40 tenant files were tested and exceptions were noted as follows: ? 5 files had annual recertifications performed later than 12 months. Context: The auditor haphazardly selected 40 tenants out of the population, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size, for testing tenant rent calculations and other eligibility requirements. The auditor viewed the tenant files and support to determine if controls over compliance were operating effectively. Criteria: The Authority?s ACOP and 24 CFR 960.257 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure proper procedures are being followed in compliance with HUD requirements regarding complete and accurate tenant files for all public housing sites. Cause: The Authority did not fully implement the established internal controls to ensure proper compliance with regards to timely correct recertifications. Effect: The Authority is not in full compliance with all HUD requirements regarding timely annual recertifications. Auditor?s Recommendations: The Authority should correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files. In addition, the Authority should follow the quality control review procedures to ensure proper monitoring of the Authority?s compliance with the requirements related to annual recertifications. View of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-001 Eligibility Public and Indian Housing - CFDA No. 14.850 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls Other matter required to be reported in accordance with Uniform Guidance Condition: Out of a total tenant population of approximately 280 tenants, 40 tenant files were tested and exceptions were noted as follows: ? 5 files had annual recertifications performed later than 12 months. Context: The auditor haphazardly selected 40 tenants out of the population, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size, for testing tenant rent calculations and other eligibility requirements. The auditor viewed the tenant files and support to determine if controls over compliance were operating effectively. Criteria: The Authority?s ACOP and 24 CFR 960.257 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure proper procedures are being followed in compliance with HUD requirements regarding complete and accurate tenant files for all public housing sites. Cause: The Authority did not fully implement the established internal controls to ensure proper compliance with regards to timely correct recertifications. Effect: The Authority is not in full compliance with all HUD requirements regarding timely annual recertifications. Auditor?s Recommendations: The Authority should correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files. In addition, the Authority should follow the quality control review procedures to ensure proper monitoring of the Authority?s compliance with the requirements related to annual recertifications. View of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN June 30, 2020 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development The Housing Authority of Beaumont, Texas respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended September 30, 2019. Berman Hopkins Wright & LaHam, CPAs and Associates, LLP 8035 Spyglass Hill Road Melbourne, FL 32940 Audit period: October 1, 2018 ? September 30, 2019 FINDINGS ? FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AUDIT 2019-001 Eligibility Public and Indian Housing Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls Other matter required to be reported in accordance with Uniform Guidance Condition: Out of a total tenant population of approximately 280 tenants, 40 tenant files were tested, and exceptions were noted as follows: ?5 files had annual recertifications performed later than 12 months. Auditor?s Recommendations: The Authority should correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files. In addition, the Authority should follow the quality control review procedures to ensure proper monitoring of the Authority?s compliance with the requirements related to annual recertifications. Action Taken: A review of the deficiencies indicated that these files were for tenants who were elderly or disabled and had difficulties coming into the office due to weather, illness, hospitalization, or transportation. The Vice-President of Assisted Programs will closely review the Annual Recertification Work List each month to ensure that recertifications are completed in a timely manner. If it is determined that a tenant is having difficulties completing their recertification, the caseworker will conduct a home visit to ensure the recertification is completed. The deficiencies have been resolved in the files noted.

About Eligibility →
2019-002
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Out of a total tenant population of approximately 1,708 tenants, 40 tenant files were tested and exceptions were noted as follows: ? 2 files had incorrect payment standards used, ? 1 file was missing a 214 declaration document for a member of the household, ? 1 file had a rent reasonableness error, and ? 2 files had calculation and document errors noted for child support income. Context: The auditor haphazardly selected 40 tenants out of the population, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size, for testing tenant rent calculations and other eligibility requirements. The auditor viewed the tenant files and support to determine if controls over compliance were operating effectively. Criteria: The Authority?s administrative plan and 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure proper procedures are being followed in compliance with HUD requirements regarding complete and accurate tenant files. Cause: The Authority did not fully implement the established internal controls to ensure proper compliance with regards to payment standards used, income calculations, and documentation. Effect: The Authority is not in full compliance with all HUD requirements regarding documentation and calculations used in the tenant recertification process. Auditor?s Recommendations: The Authority should correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files. In addition, the Authority should follow the quality control review procedures to ensure proper monitoring of the Authority?s compliance with the requirements related to tenant eligibility. View of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-002 Eligibility Housing Voucher Cluster Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls Other matter required to be reported in accordance with Uniform Guidance Condition: Out of a total tenant population of approximately 1,708 tenants, 40 tenant files were tested and exceptions were noted as follows: ? 2 files had incorrect payment standards used, ? 1 file was missing a 214 declaration document for a member of the household, ? 1 file had a rent reasonableness error, and ? 2 files had calculation and document errors noted for child support income. Context: The auditor haphazardly selected 40 tenants out of the population, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size, for testing tenant rent calculations and other eligibility requirements. The auditor viewed the tenant files and support to determine if controls over compliance were operating effectively. Criteria: The Authority?s administrative plan and 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure proper procedures are being followed in compliance with HUD requirements regarding complete and accurate tenant files. Cause: The Authority did not fully implement the established internal controls to ensure proper compliance with regards to payment standards used, income calculations, and documentation. Effect: The Authority is not in full compliance with all HUD requirements regarding documentation and calculations used in the tenant recertification process. Auditor?s Recommendations: The Authority should correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files. In addition, the Authority should follow the quality control review procedures to ensure proper monitoring of the Authority?s compliance with the requirements related to tenant eligibility. View of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

2019-002 Eligibility Housing Voucher Cluster Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls Other matter required to be reported in accordance with Uniform Guidance Condition: Out of a total tenant population of approximately 1,708 tenants, 40 tenant files were tested, and exceptions were noted as follows: ? 2 files had incorrectly payment standards used, ? 1 file was missing a 214-declaration document for a member of the household, ? 1 file had a rent reasonableness error, and ? 2 files had calculation and documents errors noted for child support income. Auditor?s Recommendations: The Authority should correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files. In addition, the Authority should follow the quality control review procedures to ensure proper monitoring of the Authority?s compliance with the requirements related to tenant eligibility. Action Taken: A review of the deficiencies indicated that the errors were limited to two caseworkers. These caseworkers have been counseled and will receive additional training to ensure compliance with our HCV Administrative Plan. In addition, BHA will bring in additional training to all staff to ensure a better understanding of the payment standard and rent calculation procedures. The deficiencies identified by the auditor have been corrected

About Eligibility →

FY 2018-09-30

$14,932,887 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 24, 2019 — management decision was due December 24, 2019.

FY 2017-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$15,551,106 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 17, 2018 — management decision was due December 17, 2018.

2017-001
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →

FY 2016-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$12,375,109 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 28, 2017 — management decision was due December 28, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.