← Back to home

The Empowerment Program, Inc.Non-Profit

EIN: 742377531

UEI: KBELAWWTM1N8

Audited by: Kundinger, Corder & Montoya, PC

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

The Empowerment Program, Inc.10 audit years6 findings2 repeat
10
Audit Years
6
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings
$2.4M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,392,358 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 12, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 12, 2026 (8 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,821,752 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 14, 2025 — management decision was due September 14, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,572,356 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2024 — management decision was due September 29, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,527,243 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 24, 2023 — management decision was due July 24, 2023.

2022-001
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2021-001OTHER MATTERS

Condition and Criteria: Empowerment used unallowable sources to meet the matching requirement. Cause: For a sample of two quarterly reports prepared by staff that were selected during the year, each report showed federal funds through a passthrough source were being used to provide the match, which are not an acceptable source of matching funds. Effect: Empowerment may not meet the matching requirement set forth under each of the grant agreements. Recommendation: We recommend management and staff obtain a thorough understanding of what match requirements are allowed under Uniform Guidance to ensure the matching funds being reported are from allowable sources. We also recommend the use of a spreadsheet to document and itemize each revenue source being used as a match.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition and Criteria: Empowerment used unallowable sources to meet the matching requirement. Cause: For a sample of two quarterly reports prepared by staff that were selected during the year, each report showed federal funds through a passthrough source were being used to provide the match, which are not an acceptable source of matching funds. Effect: Empowerment may not meet the matching requirement set forth under each of the grant agreements. Recommendation: We recommend management and staff obtain a thorough understanding of what match requirements are allowed under Uniform Guidance to ensure the matching funds being reported are from allowable sources. We also recommend the use of a spreadsheet to document and itemize each revenue source being used as a match.

Corrective Action Plan

Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The accountant agrees that Empowerment used unacceptable sources of matching funds in the past and that Empowerment did not have a full understanding of both the reporting and the match percentage. Accounting has a full understanding of the appropriate matching sources as well as the match percentage. The accountant will maintain a separate spreadsheet with the grant budgets detail the funding that is used for the match for each period to include, source, quarterly amount and totaled to match each grant year funding, ensuring only eligible funds are reported to meet the matching requirement.

Prior Finding References

2021-001

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,869,382 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 15, 2021 — management decision was due June 15, 2022.

2021-001
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2020-003OTHER MATTERS

The Organization used unallowable sources to meet the matching requirements. Additionally, the matching requirement is 100% of the grant award but was being calculated as 25% of the grant award. Cause: Until March 2021 when the FY 2020 audit concluded, management was unaware that the matching sources used, which are related to program participants? completion of therapy sessions and medication costs paid for by third parties and were not recorded on the Organization?s books, are not an acceptable source of matching funds. Management misread the grant agreements, which indicate that 25% of the match must be reported quarterly, and because the grantor only requires annual reporting, management believed they needed to match only 25% instead of 100%. Additionally, management was unaware that the federal funds are not an acceptable source of matching funds without prior approval. Effect: The Organization may not meet the matching requirements set forth under each of the grant agreements. Context: The Organization has a sufficient amount of non-federal revenue that can be used to satisfy matching requirements at 100% of the grant award. Questioned Costs: This finding did not result in any questioned costs. Identification of Repeat Findings: This finding is a partial repeat of prior-year finding 2020-003 Matching ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance. Recommendation: We recommend management obtain a thorough understanding of what match requirements are allowed under Uniform Guidance to ensure the matching funds being reported are from allowable sources. We also recommend the use of a spreadsheet to document and itemize each revenue source being used as a match.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria and Condition: The Organization used unallowable sources to meet the matching requirements. Additionally, the matching requirement is 100% of the grant award but was being calculated as 25% of the grant award. Cause: Until March 2021 when the FY 2020 audit concluded, management was unaware that the matching sources used, which are related to program participants? completion of therapy sessions and medication costs paid for by third parties and were not recorded on the Organization?s books, are not an acceptable source of matching funds. Management misread the grant agreements, which indicate that 25% of the match must be reported quarterly, and because the grantor only requires annual reporting, management believed they needed to match only 25% instead of 100%. Additionally, management was unaware that the federal funds are not an acceptable source of matching funds without prior approval. Effect: The Organization may not meet the matching requirements set forth under each of the grant agreements. Context: The Organization has a sufficient amount of non-federal revenue that can be used to satisfy matching requirements at 100% of the grant award. Questioned Costs: This finding did not result in any questioned costs. Identification of Repeat Findings: This finding is a partial repeat of prior-year finding 2020-003 Matching ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance. Recommendation: We recommend management obtain a thorough understanding of what match requirements are allowed under Uniform Guidance to ensure the matching funds being reported are from allowable sources. We also recommend the use of a spreadsheet to document and itemize each revenue source being used as a match.

Corrective Action Plan

The accountant agrees that we used unacceptable sources of matching funds in the past and that we did not have a full understanding of both the reporting and the match percentage. Accounting has a full understanding of the appropriate matching sources as well as the match percentage. The accountant will maintain a separate spreadsheet with the grant budgets detailing the funding that is used for match for each period to include source, quarterly amount and totaled to match each grant year funding.

Prior Finding References

2020-003

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →

FY 2020-06-30

$2,872,042 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 21, 2021 — management decision was due September 21, 2021.

2020-003
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

The Organization used unallowable sources to meet the matching requirements. Cause: Management was unaware that the matching sources used, which are related to program participants completion of therapy sessions and medication costs paid for by third parties and are not recorded on the Organization?s books, are not an acceptable source of matching funds. Effect: The Organization may not meet the matching requirements set forth under each of the grant agreements. Context: The Organization has a sufficient amount of non-federal revenue that can be used to satisfy matching requirements. Questioned Costs: This finding did not result in any questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend management obtain a thorough understanding of what matching requirements are allowed under Uniform Guidance to ensure the matching funds being reported are from allowable sources.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria and Condition: The Organization used unallowable sources to meet the matching requirements. Cause: Management was unaware that the matching sources used, which are related to program participants completion of therapy sessions and medication costs paid for by third parties and are not recorded on the Organization?s books, are not an acceptable source of matching funds. Effect: The Organization may not meet the matching requirements set forth under each of the grant agreements. Context: The Organization has a sufficient amount of non-federal revenue that can be used to satisfy matching requirements. Questioned Costs: This finding did not result in any questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend management obtain a thorough understanding of what matching requirements are allowed under Uniform Guidance to ensure the matching funds being reported are from allowable sources.

Corrective Action Plan

Management is reviewing the Uniform Guidance and communicating with the Colorado Department of Health and Human Services to provide the acceptable source of matching funds. Accounting has determined it has the acceptable source for the required matching funds and is actively pursuing opportunities for training so that compliance with reporting requirements is maintained.

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →
2020-004
Subrecipient Monitoring
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Subrecipient awards did not contain elements required under Uniform Guidance. Also, established subrecipient monitoring policies were not followed with regard to documenting the annual review over subrecipient activities nor did the policies include requesting and reviewing the subrecipient?s annual audit report and following-up when issues are identified. Cause and Context: Management was unaware of the elements required to be included in subrecipient grant agreements under the Uniform Guidance when the grant began in 2015. Management was not aware that they must review the annual audit report and follow-up when issues are identified. Management did not document their annual review of subrecipient activities as required by their internal audit policies for the year under audit. Effect: Not informing the subrecipient of the CFDA number and other Uniform Guidance requirements and not requesting a copy of the annual audit or following-up on issues identified may result in misuse of grant funds that may not be identified and corrected on a timely basis. Questioned Costs: This finding did not result in any questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend management review Uniform Guidance Part 6 and update their accounting policies to ensure proper internal control procedures are in place for effective subrecipient monitoring. We recommend management follow their updated accounting policies and document their annual review process.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria and Condition: Subrecipient awards did not contain elements required under Uniform Guidance. Also, established subrecipient monitoring policies were not followed with regard to documenting the annual review over subrecipient activities nor did the policies include requesting and reviewing the subrecipient?s annual audit report and following-up when issues are identified. Cause and Context: Management was unaware of the elements required to be included in subrecipient grant agreements under the Uniform Guidance when the grant began in 2015. Management was not aware that they must review the annual audit report and follow-up when issues are identified. Management did not document their annual review of subrecipient activities as required by their internal audit policies for the year under audit. Effect: Not informing the subrecipient of the CFDA number and other Uniform Guidance requirements and not requesting a copy of the annual audit or following-up on issues identified may result in misuse of grant funds that may not be identified and corrected on a timely basis. Questioned Costs: This finding did not result in any questioned costs. Recommendation: We recommend management review Uniform Guidance Part 6 and update their accounting policies to ensure proper internal control procedures are in place for effective subrecipient monitoring. We recommend management follow their updated accounting policies and document their annual review process.

Corrective Action Plan

Accounting is in the process of updating its Fiscal Policies with proper control procedures and will implement the relevant Uniform Guidance to include audit request and reviews and follow-up on any audit finding. In addition, accounting will document the review for the permanent file.

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2020-005
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

When grants are used to pay rent, the rent paid must be reasonable in relation to rents being charged for comparable unassisted units. Cause and Context: The Organization has unassisted rental units which are leased at below market rates. There are several long-term tenants housed in these units, and as the Denver housing market has quickly accelerated, management has not raised these tenants? rent at the same pace. Effect: The Organization is receiving a higher rental rate for units paid under the grant than for units paid by self-paying individuals who do not receive assistance. Questioned Costs: This finding did not result in any questioned costs because this grant is for rental assistance and is not a reimbursement based grant. Recommendation: We recommend management increase the rent for any unassisted units that are below the market rate being paid by the grant for comparable units.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria and Condition: When grants are used to pay rent, the rent paid must be reasonable in relation to rents being charged for comparable unassisted units. Cause and Context: The Organization has unassisted rental units which are leased at below market rates. There are several long-term tenants housed in these units, and as the Denver housing market has quickly accelerated, management has not raised these tenants? rent at the same pace. Effect: The Organization is receiving a higher rental rate for units paid under the grant than for units paid by self-paying individuals who do not receive assistance. Questioned Costs: This finding did not result in any questioned costs because this grant is for rental assistance and is not a reimbursement based grant. Recommendation: We recommend management increase the rent for any unassisted units that are below the market rate being paid by the grant for comparable units.

Corrective Action Plan

Management is in the process of reviewing all rent in their properties and will implement the audit recommendations. Management will invest in a property management software to assist in accomplishing these recommendations.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2019-06-30

$2,550,329 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 13, 2020 — management decision was due January 13, 2021.

FY 2018-06-30

$2,413,114 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 6, 2019 — management decision was due December 6, 2019.

2018-001
Cost Allowability / Cash Management
MODIFIED OPINIONSIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Cash Management →

FY 2017-06-30

$3,097,236 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 25, 2018 — management decision was due August 25, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,669,524 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 23, 2017 — management decision was due April 23, 2018.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Colorado

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.