EIN: 742244826
UEI: NGNKHFLTJWB3
Audited by: Anderson & Whitney P.C.
Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on February 4, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 4, 2026 (30 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on December 16, 2024 — management decision was due June 16, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on December 4, 2023 — management decision was due June 4, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on December 12, 2022 — management decision was due June 12, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on December 1, 2021 — management decision was due June 1, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on November 30, 2020 — management decision was due May 30, 2021.
Of the 25 files tested, one certification included household income that exceeded the program limits. Questioned Costs: None Context: An accurate certification is the Food Bank?s internal control over eligibility. In accurate information results in documentation that doesn?t support eligibility. Effect: The Food Bank could be distributing food assistance to ineligible participants. Cause: This appeared to be a data entry error in the OASIS Insight certification process. Recommendation: We recommend internal controls be strengthened to ensure that applications are completed accurately to assist the Food Bank in documenting eligibility. Management?s Response: Agree
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2020-001: CFDA 10.569 TEFAP Pass-Through Agency: State of Colorado Department of Human Services Criteria: Eligibility ? In determining the eligibility of households for food assistance, accurate information must be obtained from the applicant. Condition: Of the 25 files tested, one certification included household income that exceeded the program limits. Questioned Costs: None Context: An accurate certification is the Food Bank?s internal control over eligibility. In accurate information results in documentation that doesn?t support eligibility. Effect: The Food Bank could be distributing food assistance to ineligible participants. Cause: This appeared to be a data entry error in the OASIS Insight certification process. Recommendation: We recommend internal controls be strengthened to ensure that applications are completed accurately to assist the Food Bank in documenting eligibility. Management?s Response: Agree
Corrective Action: Contact Person: Bob O?Connor Corrective Action Planned: Weld Food Bank implemented a new database last year. The case file in question appears to have a data entry error. We have implemented an alert for any household that appears not to qualify for TEFAP. This alert will indicate this file needs attention.
Payroll costs charged to the TEFAP mitigation program were estimated based on direct payroll expenses charged to the TEFAP program (non-mitigation). Questioned Costs: unknown Context: Payroll costs charged to the TEFAP mitigation program were not accumulated as separate costs from other program costs in the financial accounting system. Effect: The Food Bank could be undercharging or overcharging payroll costs allocated to the TEFAP mitigation program. Cause: The internal control system did not support the distribution of costs to the TEFAP mitigation program. Recommendation: We recommend that the Food Bank establish a cost allocation policy that is to be applied consistently and include all federal awards to which payroll costs are allocated. Management?s Response: Agree
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2020-002: CFDA 10.569 TEFAP Pass-Through Agency: State of Colorado Department of Human Services Criteria: Allowable costs/cost principles ? Costs charged to federal awards must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and be supported by a system of internal control that provides reasonable assurance that charges are accurate; allowable and reasonable; and properly allocated. Condition: Payroll costs charged to the TEFAP mitigation program were estimated based on direct payroll expenses charged to the TEFAP program (non-mitigation). Questioned Costs: unknown Context: Payroll costs charged to the TEFAP mitigation program were not accumulated as separate costs from other program costs in the financial accounting system. Effect: The Food Bank could be undercharging or overcharging payroll costs allocated to the TEFAP mitigation program. Cause: The internal control system did not support the distribution of costs to the TEFAP mitigation program. Recommendation: We recommend that the Food Bank establish a cost allocation policy that is to be applied consistently and include all federal awards to which payroll costs are allocated. Management?s Response: Agree
Corrective Action: Contact Person: Bob O?Connor Corrective Action Planned: Although we have separated all expenses for mitigation, we agree that creating a program expense for mitigation costs will provide a clearer separation between Mitigation and TEFAP expenses.
FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2018 — management decision was due May 19, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on October 24, 2017 — management decision was due April 24, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on October 25, 2016 — management decision was due April 25, 2017.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Colorado →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
