← Back to home

EASTER SEALS OF GREATER HOUSTON, INC.Non-Profit

EIN: 741238418

UEI: M8FQPCF7RTA8

Audited by: Harper & Pearson Company, P.C.

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

EASTER SEALS OF GREATER HOUSTON, INC.11 audit years2 findings
11
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$6.3M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,266,808 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on July 31, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by January 31, 2027 (154 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-004
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Certain expenses are allocated amongst grants and programs based on headcount. The calculations for the allocations were not applied consistently or accurately based on identified personnel. Cause: The accounting clerk responsible for the calculations used incorrect information. Amounts allocated were reviewed for reasonableness but the detailed calculations were not reviewed. Effect: Amounts computed as eligible for reimbursement were understated by a projected immaterial amount. Recommendation: The calculations supporting amounts on requests for reimbursements should be reviewed as part of the review of all expenses included on the request.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Allocations for expenses charged to federal and non-federal awards should be representative of the prorata share of the expense over all programs and activities benefited by the expense. Condition: Certain expenses are allocated amongst grants and programs based on headcount. The calculations for the allocations were not applied consistently or accurately based on identified personnel. Cause: The accounting clerk responsible for the calculations used incorrect information. Amounts allocated were reviewed for reasonableness but the detailed calculations were not reviewed. Effect: Amounts computed as eligible for reimbursement were understated by a projected immaterial amount. Recommendation: The calculations supporting amounts on requests for reimbursements should be reviewed as part of the review of all expenses included on the request.

Corrective Action Plan

Management has provided a template, which was reviewed and approved by the CFO in April 2026, to the AP Clerk without any roundings of the allocation percentages. Management will review the calculations between January 1 and April 2026 that were used for allocations and will correct any allocations as necessary. Management will ensure the review of expenses include all calculations supporting the expense amounts. All these actions are effective January 1, 2026, and will be managed by the Chief Financial Officer.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,964,756 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 4, 2025 — management decision was due December 4, 2025.

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,204,756 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 30, 2025 — management decision was due December 30, 2025.

FY 2023-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,575,555 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 25, 2024 — management decision was due December 25, 2024.

FY 2022-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,784,725 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 15, 2023 — management decision was due February 15, 2024.

FY 2021-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,236,459 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 6, 2022 — management decision was due January 6, 2023.

FY 2020-12-31

$6,069,603 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 18, 2021 — management decision was due February 18, 2022.

FY 2019-12-31

$5,366,642 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 28, 2020 — management decision was due March 28, 2021.

2019-002
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The procurement policy for Easter Seals of Greater Houston states a micro purchase threshold of $15,000 which is greater than the threshold allowed. Cause: Easter Seals of Greater Houston management believed it had been granted a higher threshold by the State pass-thru agency of its major program based on conflicting language in the State statutes. Effect: The higher threshold could have created a situation whereby Easter Seals would not have been in compliance with the procurement provisions of the Uniform Guidance. However the nature of the expenditures charged to the federal and non-federal grants are such that there are few purchases greater than $10,000. Thus, no compliance findings or questioned costs were noted. Recommendation: Easter Seals of Greater Houston, Inc. should revise its procurement policy with respect to the micro purchase threshold to align with the Uniform Guidance amount of $10,000 and develop procedures to ensure that procurement policies are routinely verified for compliance with federal and non-federal grantor requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Easter Seals Procurement Policy was not updated correctly for changes to thresholds of micro purchases.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-02 Procurement policy Criteria: Part 200 of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, (Uniform Guidance) section 200.67 establishes a threshold for micro purchases, whereby purchases below the threshold can be awarded without soliciting competitive price quotations if the price is reasonable. For 2019 that threshold was $10,000. Condition: The procurement policy for Easter Seals of Greater Houston states a micro purchase threshold of $15,000 which is greater than the threshold allowed. Cause: Easter Seals of Greater Houston management believed it had been granted a higher threshold by the State pass-thru agency of its major program based on conflicting language in the State statutes. Effect: The higher threshold could have created a situation whereby Easter Seals would not have been in compliance with the procurement provisions of the Uniform Guidance. However the nature of the expenditures charged to the federal and non-federal grants are such that there are few purchases greater than $10,000. Thus, no compliance findings or questioned costs were noted. Recommendation: Easter Seals of Greater Houston, Inc. should revise its procurement policy with respect to the micro purchase threshold to align with the Uniform Guidance amount of $10,000 and develop procedures to ensure that procurement policies are routinely verified for compliance with federal and non-federal grantor requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: Easter Seals Procurement Policy was not updated correctly for changes to thresholds of micro purchases.

Corrective Action Plan

The Procurement Policy has been updated to include the January 2020 changes to the micro purchase threshold of $10,000 and small purchase threshold of $250,000 (the simplified acquiistion threshold). Management will perform a retroactive review of expenditures subject to Uniform Guidance for fiscal year 2020 to ensure compliance is properly documented for any purchases exceeding the updated thresholds.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2018-12-31

$4,814,539 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 13, 2019 — management decision was due December 13, 2019.

FY 2017-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,725,490 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 5, 2018 — management decision was due March 5, 2019.

FY 2016-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,305,998 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 22, 2017 — management decision was due December 22, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.