EIN: 741167964
UEI: GJHQQFSFRDP9
Audited by: BLAZEK & VETTERLING
Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on October 14, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by April 14, 2026 (142 days ago).
What is a management decision? →Finding #2025-001 – Significant Deficiency and Other Noncompliance. Applicable federal program: U. S. Department of Treasury, COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, Assistance Listing #21.027, Passed through BakerRipley, Contract period: 02/01/23 – 12/31/26, Contract number: None. Criteria: Allowable costs – The Uniform Guidance, Subpart E Cost Principles, requires that charges to federal awards for salaries and wages be based on records that accurately reflect work performed and support the distribution of an employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives, which includes being supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition and context: In a sample of 35 payroll transactions, 14 transactions for three employees did not have time and effort documentation to support the allocation of salary costs charged to the major program. For these employees who work less than 100% on the program the employees track their activities on their calendars. However, salaries were allocated based on a fixed percentage that did not vary from period to period. Cause: There was not a procedure in place to compare the actual percentage of time worked based on their calendars to the fixed percentage charged to the grant to ensure that the actual percentage of time worked was equal to or greater than the percentages charged to the grant. Effect: Failure to establish controls for adherence with the Uniform Guidance for allowable costs may result in unallowed costs charged to the program. Questioned costs: Unknown. Recommendation: Strengthen controls to require comparison of actual time and effort percentages by activity to the percentage of salaries and wages allocated to federal programs. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding #2025-001 – Significant Deficiency and Other Noncompliance. Applicable federal program: U. S. Department of Treasury, COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, Assistance Listing #21.027, Passed through BakerRipley, Contract period: 02/01/23 – 12/31/26, Contract number: None. Criteria: Allowable costs – The Uniform Guidance, Subpart E Cost Principles, requires that charges to federal awards for salaries and wages be based on records that accurately reflect work performed and support the distribution of an employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives, which includes being supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Condition and context: In a sample of 35 payroll transactions, 14 transactions for three employees did not have time and effort documentation to support the allocation of salary costs charged to the major program. For these employees who work less than 100% on the program the employees track their activities on their calendars. However, salaries were allocated based on a fixed percentage that did not vary from period to period. Cause: There was not a procedure in place to compare the actual percentage of time worked based on their calendars to the fixed percentage charged to the grant to ensure that the actual percentage of time worked was equal to or greater than the percentages charged to the grant. Effect: Failure to establish controls for adherence with the Uniform Guidance for allowable costs may result in unallowed costs charged to the program. Questioned costs: Unknown. Recommendation: Strengthen controls to require comparison of actual time and effort percentages by activity to the percentage of salaries and wages allocated to federal programs. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees with the finding. See Corrective Action Plan.
Finding #2025-001 – Significant Deficiency and Other Noncompliance. Applicable federal program: U. S. Department of Treasury, COVID-19 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, Assistance Listing #21.027, Passed through BakerRipley, Contract period: 02/01/23 – 12/31/26, Contract number: None. Condition and context: In a sample of 35 payroll transactions, 14 transactions for three employees did not have time and effort documentation to support the allocation of salary costs charged to the major program. For these employees who work less than 100% on the program the employees track their activities on their calendars. However, salaries were allocated based on a fixed percentage that did not vary from period to period. Recommendation: Strengthen controls to require comparison of actual time and effort percentages by activity to the percentage of salaries and wages allocated to federal programs. Planned corrective action: United Way of Greater Houston has implemented a reconciliation process for billed time to ensure salary allocations reflect actual time and effort for fiscal year 2025-2026. This includes a review of calendar-based activity tracking and comparison against fixed allocation percentages. To strengthen long-term compliance, United Way plans to deploy an electronic timekeeping system that enables dynamic tracking of employee effort across government grant programs. This system will support audit readiness and improve internal control over payroll allocations. Responsible officer: Bart Ferrell, Chief Strategy and Finance Officer. Estimated completion date: September 8, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on October 9, 2024 — management decision was due April 9, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on December 13, 2023 — management decision was due June 13, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on October 31, 2022 — management decision was due May 1, 2023.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Texas →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.