EIN: 736027530
UEI: UHS1SSVWXNE7
Audited by: ARLEDGE & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on January 15, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 15, 2026 (53 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on January 22, 2025 — management decision was due July 22, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on February 5, 2024 — management decision was due August 5, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2023 — management decision was due July 3, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on November 13, 2022 — management decision was due May 13, 2023.
CRITERIA: The schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) should include all federal expenditures of federal awards during the fiscal year under audit. CONDITION: The City's schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 improperly excluded approximately $164,000 of expenditures incurred during the year related to the Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) program. CAUSE: Expenditures for the federal program are reported for reimbursement through project worksheets that correspond to specific components of the response to and recovery from the disaster as defined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Grants management personnel prepare the project worksheets and accounting personnel prepare the SEFA. There were not sufficient controls in place to ensure that all federal expenditures incurred during the year were communicated from grants management personnel to accounting personnel for inclusion in the SEFA. EFFECT: Expenditures from only one of the four project worksheets containing expenditures incurred under the federal program during the year were included in the SEFA. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the City establish controls to ensure sufficient review of the SEFA is performed by all individuals necessary to determine that all federal expenditures incurred during the year are correctly reflected in the SEFA. CITY MANAGEMENT RESPONSE: Concur, the FY-2021 reimbursable costs addressed were not processed/reimbursed until FY-2022. Our Finance staff was not aware of such costs at the time of preparing the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). Also the Finance Department had a staff change during the SEFA preparation. In the future, with new staff in place, the Finance Department will have regular discussions with the Grants Department staff to ensure the proper recording of transactions.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴CRITERIA: The schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) should include all federal expenditures of federal awards during the fiscal year under audit. CONDITION: The City's schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 improperly excluded approximately $164,000 of expenditures incurred during the year related to the Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) program. CAUSE: Expenditures for the federal program are reported for reimbursement through project worksheets that correspond to specific components of the response to and recovery from the disaster as defined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Grants management personnel prepare the project worksheets and accounting personnel prepare the SEFA. There were not sufficient controls in place to ensure that all federal expenditures incurred during the year were communicated from grants management personnel to accounting personnel for inclusion in the SEFA. EFFECT: Expenditures from only one of the four project worksheets containing expenditures incurred under the federal program during the year were included in the SEFA. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the City establish controls to ensure sufficient review of the SEFA is performed by all individuals necessary to determine that all federal expenditures incurred during the year are correctly reflected in the SEFA. CITY MANAGEMENT RESPONSE: Concur, the FY-2021 reimbursable costs addressed were not processed/reimbursed until FY-2022. Our Finance staff was not aware of such costs at the time of preparing the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). Also the Finance Department had a staff change during the SEFA preparation. In the future, with new staff in place, the Finance Department will have regular discussions with the Grants Department staff to ensure the proper recording of transactions.
Finding 2021-003: Concur, the FY-2021 reimbursable costs addressed were not processed/reimbursed until FY-2022. Our Finance staff was not aware of such costs at the time of preparing the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). Also the Finance Department had a staff change during the SEFA preparation. In the future, with new staff in place, the Finance Department will have regular discussions with the Grants Department staff to ensure the proper recording of transactions. Estimated completion: Occur before and during the preparation of SEFA, ongoing process. Responsible party: Tiatia Cromar, Finance Director (405) 739-1245; Terri Craft, Grants Management Director (405) 739-1217.
CRITERIA: Uniform Guidance, Section 200.510 (b) (2) requires subrecipients to indicate if federal funding received was provided by a subrecipient on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) by including the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity. CONDITION: The City's SEFA for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 as originally issued did not include the pass-through entity information for the Federal programs listed above. CAUSE: Lack of timely communication between the City's Finance and Grants departments. EFFECT: the City's SEFA was not prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the City establish controls to ensure sufficient review of the SEFA is performed by all individuals necessary to determine that the characteristics of each Federal award, including whether it is a direct program or a pass-through program, is properly documented. CITY MANAGEMENT RESPONSE: The City did not identify the pass-through grantor information for FAL #'s 21.027, 21.019 and 97.036. The draft SEFA prepared by the City did properly identify the pass-through grantor information for FAL #'s 16.738 and 14.239, but the pass-through information was inadvertently omitted from the final report. In the future, the City's finance and grants departments will compare all grant agreements to the SEFA to ensure that pass-through grantor information has been properly identified.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴CRITERIA: Uniform Guidance, Section 200.510 (b) (2) requires subrecipients to indicate if federal funding received was provided by a subrecipient on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) by including the name of the pass-through entity and identifying number assigned by the pass-through entity. CONDITION: The City's SEFA for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 as originally issued did not include the pass-through entity information for the Federal programs listed above. CAUSE: Lack of timely communication between the City's Finance and Grants departments. EFFECT: the City's SEFA was not prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the City establish controls to ensure sufficient review of the SEFA is performed by all individuals necessary to determine that the characteristics of each Federal award, including whether it is a direct program or a pass-through program, is properly documented. CITY MANAGEMENT RESPONSE: The City did not identify the pass-through grantor information for FAL #'s 21.027, 21.019 and 97.036. The draft SEFA prepared by the City did properly identify the pass-through grantor information for FAL #'s 16.738 and 14.239, but the pass-through information was inadvertently omitted from the final report. In the future, the City's finance and grants departments will compare all grant agreements to the SEFA to ensure that pass-through grantor information has been properly identified.
Finding 2021-004: The City did not identify the pass-through grantor information for FAL #?s 21.027, 21.019 and 97.036. The draft SEFA prepared by the City did properly identify the pass-through grantor information for FAL #?s 16.738 and 14.239, but the pass-through information was inadvertently omitted from the final report. In the future, the City?s finance and grants departments will compare all grant agreements to the SEFA to ensure that pass-through grantor information has been properly identified. Estimated Completion: Occur during the preparation of SEFA, ongoing process. Responsible party: Tiatia Cromar, Finance Director, 405-739-1245.
FAC accepted this audit on January 28, 2021 — management decision was due July 28, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on February 6, 2020 — management decision was due August 6, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on February 5, 2018 — management decision was due August 5, 2018.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Oklahoma →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.