EIN: 736021242
UEI: MM6THBDL1CT5
Audited by: Forvis Mazars, LLP
Cognizant agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 27, 2026 (28 days from today).
What is a management decision? →Federal program – Child Nutrition Cluster – Assistance Listing Numbers 10.553 (School Breakfast Program), 10.555 (National School Lunch Program), and 10.559 (Summer Food Service Program for Children) – U.S. Department of Agriculture Program Year 2024–2025 Criteria or specific requirement – Suspension and debarment – 2 CFR §200.214 Condition – During our audit, documentation supporting verification of the suspension and debarment status was not able to be provided for a vendor with which a new covered transaction was entered. However, the vendor is not currently registered as being suspended or debarred. Cause – District procedures are designed to verify suspension and debarment status only upon initial vendor setup and do not require verification upon execution of each new covered transaction with an existing vendor. Effect or potential effect – This condition increases the risk that covered transactions could be entered into with vendors that may become suspended or debarred after initial vendor setup, which could result in noncompliance with federal requirements if not addressed. Questioned Costs – N/A Context – Out of a population of five vendors with which a covered transaction was entered into during the period, one was selected for testing. Documentation supporting the verification of the suspension and debarment status for this vendor was not able to be provided. Our sample was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – N/A Recommendation – We recommend the District update its policies and procedures to require suspension and debarment verification for all covered transactions, including those involving existing vendors, either prior to contract execution or award or on an annual basis. The District should also ensure such reviews are documented and retained in accordance with federal record retention requirements. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action – Management agrees with this finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal program – Child Nutrition Cluster – Assistance Listing Numbers 10.553 (School Breakfast Program), 10.555 (National School Lunch Program), and 10.559 (Summer Food Service Program for Children) – U.S. Department of Agriculture Program Year 2024–2025 Criteria or specific requirement – Suspension and debarment – 2 CFR §200.214 Condition – During our audit, documentation supporting verification of the suspension and debarment status was not able to be provided for a vendor with which a new covered transaction was entered. However, the vendor is not currently registered as being suspended or debarred. Cause – District procedures are designed to verify suspension and debarment status only upon initial vendor setup and do not require verification upon execution of each new covered transaction with an existing vendor. Effect or potential effect – This condition increases the risk that covered transactions could be entered into with vendors that may become suspended or debarred after initial vendor setup, which could result in noncompliance with federal requirements if not addressed. Questioned Costs – N/A Context – Out of a population of five vendors with which a covered transaction was entered into during the period, one was selected for testing. Documentation supporting the verification of the suspension and debarment status for this vendor was not able to be provided. Our sample was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – N/A Recommendation – We recommend the District update its policies and procedures to require suspension and debarment verification for all covered transactions, including those involving existing vendors, either prior to contract execution or award or on an annual basis. The District should also ensure such reviews are documented and retained in accordance with federal record retention requirements. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action – Management agrees with this finding.
Finding: During our audit, we identified that the District failed to check the suspension and debarment status of a vendor with which a new covered transaction was entered. The vendor is not currently registered as being suspended or debarred. Corrective Action: Tulsa Public Schools acknowledges the finding and is implementing corrective measures to update existing policies and procedures to perform the suspension and debarment verification for all covered transactions on a regular basis. Implementation of these corrective measures is expected by June 30, 2026. Owner: Robert Sauceda, Executive Director of Accounting
Federal program – Child Nutrition Cluster – Assistance Listing Numbers 10.553 (School Breakfast Program), 10.555 (National School Lunch Program), and 10.559 (Summer Food Service Program for Children) – U.S. Department of Agriculture Program Year 2024-2025 Criteria or specific requirement – Procurement – 7 CFR §210.21 and 2 CFR §200.319(c) Condition – During our audit, we identified that the District included a geographic (local) preference in a Request for Proposal (RFP) and related vendor evaluation that was funded, in whole or in part, with federal program resources. Federal regulations generally prohibit the use of geographic preferences in the evaluation of bids or proposals for federally funded procurements unless expressly authorized by federal statute. Cause – District procurement procedures allow for the inclusion of local preference considerations in solicitations and evaluations. While the District is aware of the requirement that such preference is not included in federally funded RFPs, this was not adequately considered when determining the specific expenditures to be applied to the federal program. Effect or potential effect – This condition presents a risk that expenditures associated with procurements including local preference considerations may be allocated to federal programs in a manner that does not fully align with federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs – N/A Context – Out of a population of five transactions requiring RFPs that were entered into during the period, one was selected for testing. The RFP for this purchase included consideration of local preference within the evaluation process. Upon identification of the condition to the transaction selected for testing the other four transactions requiring RFP entered into by the District were tested to ensure they were not awarded based on a local geographic presence which we confirmed were not. Our sample was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – N/A Recommendation – We recommend the District update its policies and procedures to clearly prohibit the use of a local preference when completing RFPs funded with or expected to be funded with federal programs. The District should also ensure that procurement staff receive appropriate training on federal procurement requirements and that compliance is documented and retained in accordance with federal record retention requirements. In addition, we recommend that the District consider whether or not federal procurement requirements were adhered to when reclassifying expenditures between federal and non-federal sources. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action – Management agrees with this finding and believes that other eligible expenses paid by the District can be applied to the grant funds.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal program – Child Nutrition Cluster – Assistance Listing Numbers 10.553 (School Breakfast Program), 10.555 (National School Lunch Program), and 10.559 (Summer Food Service Program for Children) – U.S. Department of Agriculture Program Year 2024-2025 Criteria or specific requirement – Procurement – 7 CFR §210.21 and 2 CFR §200.319(c) Condition – During our audit, we identified that the District included a geographic (local) preference in a Request for Proposal (RFP) and related vendor evaluation that was funded, in whole or in part, with federal program resources. Federal regulations generally prohibit the use of geographic preferences in the evaluation of bids or proposals for federally funded procurements unless expressly authorized by federal statute. Cause – District procurement procedures allow for the inclusion of local preference considerations in solicitations and evaluations. While the District is aware of the requirement that such preference is not included in federally funded RFPs, this was not adequately considered when determining the specific expenditures to be applied to the federal program. Effect or potential effect – This condition presents a risk that expenditures associated with procurements including local preference considerations may be allocated to federal programs in a manner that does not fully align with federal procurement requirements. Questioned Costs – N/A Context – Out of a population of five transactions requiring RFPs that were entered into during the period, one was selected for testing. The RFP for this purchase included consideration of local preference within the evaluation process. Upon identification of the condition to the transaction selected for testing the other four transactions requiring RFP entered into by the District were tested to ensure they were not awarded based on a local geographic presence which we confirmed were not. Our sample was not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable – N/A Recommendation – We recommend the District update its policies and procedures to clearly prohibit the use of a local preference when completing RFPs funded with or expected to be funded with federal programs. The District should also ensure that procurement staff receive appropriate training on federal procurement requirements and that compliance is documented and retained in accordance with federal record retention requirements. In addition, we recommend that the District consider whether or not federal procurement requirements were adhered to when reclassifying expenditures between federal and non-federal sources. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective action – Management agrees with this finding and believes that other eligible expenses paid by the District can be applied to the grant funds.
Finding: During our audit, we identified that the District included a geographic (local) preference in a Request for Proposal (RFP) and related vendor evaluation that was funded, in whole or in part, with the federal program noted above. Federal regulations generally prohibit the use of geographic preferences in the evaluation of bids or proposals for federally funded procurements unless expressly authorized by federal statute. Corrective Action: Tulsa Public Schools acknowledges the finding and is implementing corrective measures to update existing policies and procedures regarding the Request for Proposal (RFP) process to remove geographic (local) preference as part of the evaluation for federal procurement. Implementation of these corrective measures is expected by June 30, 2026. Owner: Rachel Vejraska, Director of Procurement
FAC accepted this audit on April 19, 2025 — management decision was due October 19, 2025.
The Single Audit package for the District’s year ended June 30, 2024 should have been submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse by March 31, 2025. Cause: There were delays in completing the audit by March 31, 2025. Effect or potential effect: Potential suspension of funding provided by federal agencies. Questioned costs: None Context: The June 30, 2024 Single Audit package. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No, this is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the District file the reporting package timely to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2024-003 All Assistance Listing numbers and Federal Agencies (and pass-through entities) included on the accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards for the year ended June 30, 2024 Finding: The Single Audit package was not submitted to the Federal Clearinghouse within the required time period. Criteria: Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.512(a) requires that organization’s audit must be completed and the data collection form and reporting package should be submitted within the earlier of 30 days after receipt of the auditor’s report or nine months after the end of the audit period. Condition: The Single Audit package for the District’s year ended June 30, 2024 should have been submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse by March 31, 2025. Cause: There were delays in completing the audit by March 31, 2025. Effect or potential effect: Potential suspension of funding provided by federal agencies. Questioned costs: None Context: The June 30, 2024 Single Audit package. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: No, this is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the District file the reporting package timely to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding.
Tulsa Public Schools concurs with the finding regarding the late submission of the Single Audit package for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. The delay was due to the district's external auditors requesting additional time to complete extended testing and audit procedures prompted by the findings in the Oklahoma State Auditor and Inspector (OSAI) report. While this situation was outside the district’s direct control, the district recognizes the importance of timely federal reporting and is implementing a corrective strategy to mitigate future risks of noncompliance. Going forward, the district will revise its audit readiness timeline to account for possible additional audit procedures or investigative follow-up. The Director of Accounting will coordinate more proactively with external auditors to communicate any potential delays and ensure resource availability for timely completion. The district is committed to submitting its FY2025 Single Audit package on or before the required deadline and ensuring continued transparency in its federal compliance reporting. Tulsa Public Schools is committed to full compliance and confirms that the FY2024 Single Audit package will be submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse no later than April 30, 2025. Owner: Vonnita Edwards, Financial Reporting Manager
FAC accepted this audit on February 15, 2024 — management decision was due August 15, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2023 — management decision was due September 30, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on May 4, 2022 — management decision was due November 4, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on February 1, 2021 — management decision was due August 1, 2021.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2019-001
FAC accepted this audit on January 6, 2020 — management decision was due July 6, 2020.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FAC accepted this audit on March 13, 2019 — management decision was due September 13, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on January 29, 2018 — management decision was due July 29, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on January 11, 2017 — management decision was due July 11, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Oklahoma →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.