← Back to home

BURNS FLAT-DILL CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT #10Local Government

EIN: 731426315

UEI: MDUAE6SJC8G3

Audited by: BRITTON, KUYKENDALL & MILLER, CPA'S

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

BURNS FLAT-DILL CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT #1010 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$929K
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$929,017 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 24, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 24, 2026 (25 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,633,118 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 25, 2025 — management decision was due September 25, 2025.

2024-001
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSOTHER MATTERS

Construction projects paid with federal monies did not meet the compliance requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act. Criteria: The Davis-Bacon Act requires that nonfederal entities shall meet certain requirements for the construction, alteration or repair of public buildings or public works in excess of $2,000.00. Any contract entered into must include the locally prevailing wage to be paid to workers including fringe benefits. The contractor is obliged to pay at least the prevailing wage listed in the contract. Contractors are required to pay covered workers weekly and submit weekly certified payrolls to the contracting entity. They are also required to post the applicable Davis-Bacon wage determination along with the Davis-Bacon poster at the job site. Cause: The District did not follow the requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act when expending federal monies. Effect: The District could be liable for paying any additional wages if the contractor did not pay prevailing wage rates to laborers working on the project, or the expenditures could be disallowed for the expenditures that were subject to the Davis-Bacon Act. Recommendation: We recommend the District develop internal controls to meet the requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act that ensure any time federal awards are used on construction that compliance with contracts, including inserting the prevailing wage clauses and ensuring that federal wage rates and fringes are met by an effective monitoring process which includes collecting and reviewing weekly certified payroll reports from the contractor or subcontractor. Also, ensuring that all items are posted at the work site to ensure compliance. District’s Response: The District will develop internal controls to ensure that in the future if federal awards are expended on construction that all requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act will be met. Questioned Costs: $ 0

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Material Weaknesses: 2024-001 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass Thru Entity: Oklahoma State Department of Education Program: COVID-19 ARP ESSER III Assistance Listing: 84.425U Grant Period: Year Ending June 30, 2024 Condition: Construction projects paid with federal monies did not meet the compliance requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act. Criteria: The Davis-Bacon Act requires that nonfederal entities shall meet certain requirements for the construction, alteration or repair of public buildings or public works in excess of $2,000.00. Any contract entered into must include the locally prevailing wage to be paid to workers including fringe benefits. The contractor is obliged to pay at least the prevailing wage listed in the contract. Contractors are required to pay covered workers weekly and submit weekly certified payrolls to the contracting entity. They are also required to post the applicable Davis-Bacon wage determination along with the Davis-Bacon poster at the job site. Cause: The District did not follow the requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act when expending federal monies. Effect: The District could be liable for paying any additional wages if the contractor did not pay prevailing wage rates to laborers working on the project, or the expenditures could be disallowed for the expenditures that were subject to the Davis-Bacon Act. Recommendation: We recommend the District develop internal controls to meet the requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act that ensure any time federal awards are used on construction that compliance with contracts, including inserting the prevailing wage clauses and ensuring that federal wage rates and fringes are met by an effective monitoring process which includes collecting and reviewing weekly certified payroll reports from the contractor or subcontractor. Also, ensuring that all items are posted at the work site to ensure compliance. District’s Response: The District will develop internal controls to ensure that in the future if federal awards are expended on construction that all requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act will be met. Questioned Costs: $ 0

Corrective Action Plan

The District has developed and implemented internal control policies to ensure compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act any time the District is expending Federals awards. The District will post all required work site posters concerning prevailing wage rates and review and examine weekly payroll reports from contractors or subcontractors.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2023-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,321,676 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2024 — management decision was due September 29, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$2,126,609 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 21, 2023 — management decision was due September 21, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,088,950 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 23, 2022 — management decision was due September 23, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$841,866 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 22, 2021 — management decision was due September 22, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$854,919 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2020 — management decision was due September 29, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$811,551 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2019 — management decision was due September 26, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$814,818 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2018 — management decision was due September 27, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$835,923 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2017 — management decision was due September 29, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Oklahoma

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.