EIN: 731237070
UEI: R112PP2REV21
Audited by: Bland & Associates
Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 31, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on February 27, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 27, 2026 (6 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on July 24, 2025 — management decision was due January 24, 2026.
2022-002
2022-002
FAC accepted this audit on October 17, 2025 — management decision was due April 17, 2026.
2022-002
2022-002
FAC accepted this audit on January 30, 2025 — management decision was due July 30, 2025.
2021-005
FAC accepted this audit on May 3, 2024 — management decision was due November 3, 2024.
For the Child Care Development Fund (CCDF) program, support could not be provided for costs charged to the program to support the allowability of costs and activities and whether the charges were incurred during the appropriate period of performance. Out of the ten transactions tested for this program, adequate supporting documentation could not be provided for six transactions. For the Self-Governance program, support could not be provided for costs charged to the program to support the allowability of costs and activities and whether the charges were incurred during the appropriate period of performance. Out of the ten transactions tested for this program, adequate supporting documentation could not be provided for five transactions. For the Relief Fund COVID19 program, support could not be provided for costs charged to the program to support the allowability of costs and activities and whether the charges were incurred during the appropriate period of performance. Out of the 25 transactions tested for this program, adequate supporting documentation could not be provided for 14 transactions. Cause: The Department did not have adequate internal controls to ensure documentation was maintained to support costs charged to federal programs. Effect: Certain costs could not be supported as allowable, incurred during the appropriate period of performance, or incurred prior to submission for reimbursement were charged to federal programs. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs were $29,104 for the CCDF program, $54,254 the Self-Governance program, $137,575 for the Relief Fund COVID19. Recommendation: We recommend that management continue to implement additional control processes in order to ensure proper controls are in place and followed. Tribal Response: Management agrees with this finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2021-003 Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that costs must be adequately documented and retained to demonstrate that only costs for allowable activities or allowable costs are charged to federal programs. Documentation should also support that expenditures are incurred during the period of availability and prior to submission for reimbursement. Condition: For the Child Care Development Fund (CCDF) program, support could not be provided for costs charged to the program to support the allowability of costs and activities and whether the charges were incurred during the appropriate period of performance. Out of the ten transactions tested for this program, adequate supporting documentation could not be provided for six transactions. For the Self-Governance program, support could not be provided for costs charged to the program to support the allowability of costs and activities and whether the charges were incurred during the appropriate period of performance. Out of the ten transactions tested for this program, adequate supporting documentation could not be provided for five transactions. For the Relief Fund COVID19 program, support could not be provided for costs charged to the program to support the allowability of costs and activities and whether the charges were incurred during the appropriate period of performance. Out of the 25 transactions tested for this program, adequate supporting documentation could not be provided for 14 transactions. Cause: The Department did not have adequate internal controls to ensure documentation was maintained to support costs charged to federal programs. Effect: Certain costs could not be supported as allowable, incurred during the appropriate period of performance, or incurred prior to submission for reimbursement were charged to federal programs. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs were $29,104 for the CCDF program, $54,254 the Self-Governance program, $137,575 for the Relief Fund COVID19. Recommendation: We recommend that management continue to implement additional control processes in order to ensure proper controls are in place and followed. Tribal Response: Management agrees with this finding.
2021-003 Costs must be adequately documented Management Response: The Tribe recently went through administrative changes and we now have a Finance Department that will ensure we address this concern and correct it in a timely manner. We will revisit our current controls and use updated technology to improve our processes. Anticipated Completion Date: 12/31/2024 Responsible Party: Treasurer, Comptroller, Accounting Manager and Federal Programs Accounting Manager
2020-005
For the Department’s indirect cost pool, support could not be provided for costs charged to the program to support the allowability of costs and activities and whether the charges were incurred during the appropriate period of performance. Due to the allowability testing issues documented in the findings above, testing over the indirect cost pool was not able to be completed. Cause: The Department did not have adequate internal controls to ensure documentation was maintained to support costs charged to the Department’s indirect cost pool. Effect: Certain costs could not be supported as allowable, incurred during the appropriate period of performance, or incurred prior to submission for reimbursement were charged to the indirect cost pool. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend that management continue to implement additional control processes in order to ensure proper controls are in place and followed. Tribal Response: Management agrees with this finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2021-004 Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that charges to cost pools that are allocated wholly or partially to Federal awards or used in formulating indirect cost rates used for recovering indirect costs under Federal Awards are in conformance with 2 CFR sections 200.402 through 200.411. Condition: For the Department’s indirect cost pool, support could not be provided for costs charged to the program to support the allowability of costs and activities and whether the charges were incurred during the appropriate period of performance. Due to the allowability testing issues documented in the findings above, testing over the indirect cost pool was not able to be completed. Cause: The Department did not have adequate internal controls to ensure documentation was maintained to support costs charged to the Department’s indirect cost pool. Effect: Certain costs could not be supported as allowable, incurred during the appropriate period of performance, or incurred prior to submission for reimbursement were charged to the indirect cost pool. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend that management continue to implement additional control processes in order to ensure proper controls are in place and followed. Tribal Response: Management agrees with this finding.
2021-004 Charges to cost pools that are allocated wholly or partially to Federal awards Management Response: The Tribe has indirect cost agreements through 12.31.2024 and will book the indirect cost according to the rate for audited fiscal years going forward Anticipated Completion Date: 12/31/2024 Responsible Party: Treasurer, Comptroller, Accounting Manager and Federal Programs Accounting Manager
2020-006
The Department was able to provide a procurement policy, but it was dated in 2003 and not updated for the latest federal guidelines noted in the criteria paragraph. Cause: The Department does not have internal controls in place surrounding procurement policies and procedures. Effect: The lack of internal controls surrounding the procurement policies and procedures could lead to potential funding issues in the future. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend that management continue to implement additional control processes in order to ensure proper controls are in place and followed. Tribal Response: Management agrees with this finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2021-005 Criteria: Non-Federal entities other than States, including those operating Federal programs as subrecipients of States, must follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326. They must use their own documented procurement procedures, which reflect applicable state and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal statutes and the procurement requirements identified in 2 CFR part 200. Condition: The Department was able to provide a procurement policy, but it was dated in 2003 and not updated for the latest federal guidelines noted in the criteria paragraph. Cause: The Department does not have internal controls in place surrounding procurement policies and procedures. Effect: The lack of internal controls surrounding the procurement policies and procedures could lead to potential funding issues in the future. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend that management continue to implement additional control processes in order to ensure proper controls are in place and followed. Tribal Response: Management agrees with this finding.
2021-005 Procurement Standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 Management Response: The Tribe will update fiscal, payroll, HR, and procurement policies by the end of the year. Anticipated Completion Date: 12/31/2024 Responsible Party: Treasurer, Comptroller, Accounting Manager and Federal Programs Accounting Manager
2020-009
For the CCDF program, the annual financial expenditure report was not made available for audit testing. Cause: The CCDF program needs to increase internal controls surrounding the reporting process. Effect: The lack of filing of required reports could lead to questioned costs and potential issues with future grant funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend that management continue to implement additional control processes in order to ensure proper controls are in place and followed. Tribal Response: Management agrees with this finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2021-006 Criteria: For the Public Law 102-477 requires an annual financial expenditure report (version 2) (OMB Control No. 1076-0135) to be submitted for each plan period until all funds available for the plan period have been fully expended and reported. Condition: For the CCDF program, the annual financial expenditure report was not made available for audit testing. Cause: The CCDF program needs to increase internal controls surrounding the reporting process. Effect: The lack of filing of required reports could lead to questioned costs and potential issues with future grant funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend that management continue to implement additional control processes in order to ensure proper controls are in place and followed. Tribal Response: Management agrees with this finding.
2021-006 Annual Financial Expenditure Report Management Response: The Federal Programs Accounting Manager is working on submitting 425 reports and other financial reports with an anticipated completion date by the end of the year. Anticipated Completion Date: 12/31/2024 Responsible Party: Federal Programs Accounting Manager
Coronavirus Relief Fund program, the quarterly financial progress reports were not made available for audit testing. Cause: The Coronavirus Relief Fund program needs to increase internal controls surrounding the reporting process. Effect: The lack of filing of required reports could lead to questioned costs and potential issues with future grant funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend that management continue to implement additional control processes in order to ensure proper controls are in place and followed. Tribal Response: Management agrees with this finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2021-007 Criteria: Each prime recipient of the Fund shall provide a quarterly financial progress report that contains COVID-19 related costs incurred during the covered period (the beginning on March 1, 2020; and ending on December 31, 2021) to Treasury OIG. Each prime recipient shall report this quarterly information mentioned above into the GrantSolutions Portal. The prime recipient’s quarterly Financial Progress Report submissions should be supported by the data in the prime recipient’s accounting system. Condition: Coronavirus Relief Fund program, the quarterly financial progress reports were not made available for audit testing. Cause: The Coronavirus Relief Fund program needs to increase internal controls surrounding the reporting process. Effect: The lack of filing of required reports could lead to questioned costs and potential issues with future grant funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend that management continue to implement additional control processes in order to ensure proper controls are in place and followed. Tribal Response: Management agrees with this finding.
2021-007 Quarterly Financial Progress Report Management Response: The ARPA funds are being reported on a quarterly basis and likely the CARES funds were being reported on as well. Given the turnover, we’re unable to access the portal to see if reports were completed for CARES. Anticipated Completion Date: 12/31/2024 Responsible Party: Federal Programs Accounting Manager
FAC accepted this audit on December 21, 2021 — management decision was due June 21, 2022.
2019-002
2019-003
2019-004
2019-005
2019-006
2019-009
FAC accepted this audit on August 25, 2021 — management decision was due February 25, 2022.
2018-006
2018-007
2018-002
2018-003
2018-005
FAC accepted this audit on December 1, 2020 — management decision was due June 1, 2021.
2017-005
2017-006
FAC accepted this audit on February 24, 2020 — management decision was due August 24, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on December 27, 2017 — management decision was due June 27, 2018.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Oklahoma →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.