EIN: 730754968
UEI: ZNNAN4L5JLQ2
Audited by: Audit Solutions, LLC.
Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 18, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 18, 2025 (347 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on May 6, 2024 — management decision was due November 6, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on June 26, 2022 — management decision was due December 26, 2022.
The present system of internal accounting controls in certain situation does not provide for segregation of duties in the performance of functions due to a limited size of the staff. Questioned Costs: None noted. Effect: As a result of this condition, there is a likelihood that intentional or unintentional errors will go undetected. Cause: Due to the small size of the entity, the Authority?s decision was based on a ?cost to benefit? relationship which does not justify the addition of additional staff to accomplish the desired segregation. Recommendation: I recommend that the Authority take steps to ensure compensating controls are in place to mitigate the lack of segregation of duties so that risk of errors can be prevented. Management?s Response: During FY 2021, we did not have a need for a third person in the office (we believe Covid-19 played a part in the flow of traffic in the office). We take great steps to verify every deposit if correct and accurate. One of us in the office takes the rent and the other writes up the deposit and takes it to the bank. For FY 2022, this has been taken care to prevent any further audit findings regarding segregation of duties.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Segregation of Duties Criteria: To ensure effective internal control, a segregation of duties between individuals who authorize transactions and individuals who have control over related assets must always exist. Condition: The present system of internal accounting controls in certain situation does not provide for segregation of duties in the performance of functions due to a limited size of the staff. Questioned Costs: None noted. Effect: As a result of this condition, there is a likelihood that intentional or unintentional errors will go undetected. Cause: Due to the small size of the entity, the Authority?s decision was based on a ?cost to benefit? relationship which does not justify the addition of additional staff to accomplish the desired segregation. Recommendation: I recommend that the Authority take steps to ensure compensating controls are in place to mitigate the lack of segregation of duties so that risk of errors can be prevented. Management?s Response: During FY 2021, we did not have a need for a third person in the office (we believe Covid-19 played a part in the flow of traffic in the office). We take great steps to verify every deposit if correct and accurate. One of us in the office takes the rent and the other writes up the deposit and takes it to the bank. For FY 2022, this has been taken care to prevent any further audit findings regarding segregation of duties.
Segregation of Duties Corrective action planned: The Executive Director will make all deposits. The cash receipt ledger will be checked against the tenant cash receipts when deposits are made. It will again be reconciled at the end of the month by the Executive Director and will also be sent to the Housing Authority?s fee accountant. Contact person: Dorothy Reinke, Executive Director. Anticipated completion date: May 23, 2022, immediately.
2020-001
I noted the following deficiencies in bank collateral for funds as of September 30, 2021: Deposit Insured Deficiencies Blue Sky Bank $307,617 $250,000 $57,617 Questioned Costs: None noted. Effect: The Authority funds on deposit in excess of $250,000 are vulnerable. Cause: The Authority did not monitor the balances of its accounts closely enough to ensure adequate protection of all funds. Recommendation: I recommend that the Authority request the bank pledge collateral to insure the Authority?s balances in excess of the FDIC limit of $250,000. Management?s Response: This was an oversight by the Authority. We have contacted the bank to implement and gotten this taken care of. Going forward, we will closely monitor all investments the Housing Authority has. For FY 2022, this has been taken care of to prevent any further audit findings.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Bank Collateral Criteria: All funds on deposit at a financial institution should be safeguarded by either FDIC insurance or collateral pledged by financial institution. Condition: I noted the following deficiencies in bank collateral for funds as of September 30, 2021: Deposit Insured Deficiencies Blue Sky Bank $307,617 $250,000 $57,617 Questioned Costs: None noted. Effect: The Authority funds on deposit in excess of $250,000 are vulnerable. Cause: The Authority did not monitor the balances of its accounts closely enough to ensure adequate protection of all funds. Recommendation: I recommend that the Authority request the bank pledge collateral to insure the Authority?s balances in excess of the FDIC limit of $250,000. Management?s Response: This was an oversight by the Authority. We have contacted the bank to implement and gotten this taken care of. Going forward, we will closely monitor all investments the Housing Authority has. For FY 2022, this has been taken care of to prevent any further audit findings.
Bank Collateral Corrective action planned: Executive Director will monitor monthly financial statements of all Housing Authority investments closely to ensure that all monies are properly secured. Executive Director will also maintain copies of all Bank Collateral pledges in the office. Contact person: Dorothy Reinke, Executive Director. Anticipated completion date: May 23, 2022, immediately.
FAC accepted this audit on April 29, 2020 — management decision was due October 29, 2020.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Oklahoma →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.