← Back to home

City of St. MartinvilleLocal Government

EIN: 726001277

UEI: M5JQYBVL3JC7

Audited by: Kolder, Slaven, & Company

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

City of St. Martinville5 audit years5 findings
5
Audit Years
5
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.1M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$1,104,802 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on February 24, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 24, 2026 (6 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2022-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$2,969,525 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 14, 2023 — management decision was due August 14, 2023.

FY 2020-06-30

$770,171 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 12, 2021 — management decision was due September 12, 2021.

2020-013
Other
OTHER MATTERS

Compliance Findings - United States Department of the Treasury 2020-013 Written Policies for Federal Programs Fiscal year finding initially occurred: 2020 Coronavirus Relief Fund (21.019): Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 300.302(b)(7), the City is required to have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E ? Cost Principles. Condition The City was unable to provide documentation of written procedures for determining the allowability of cost. Cause The City did not review the administrative requirements to ensure compliance with the financial management section of the Uniform Guidance. Effect The City did not comply with 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7). Context The Government did not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs of federal expenditures in accordance with 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7). Recommendation Management should review the administrative requirements for federal programs to ensure compliance with all federal award requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Management will review the administrative requirements for federal programs to ensure compliance with all federal award requirements. Prior to funding, all proposed activities will be reviewed for compliance with the appropriate federal requirements.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Compliance Findings - United States Department of the Treasury 2020-013 Written Policies for Federal Programs Fiscal year finding initially occurred: 2020 Coronavirus Relief Fund (21.019): Criteria In accordance with 2 CFR 300.302(b)(7), the City is required to have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E ? Cost Principles. Condition The City was unable to provide documentation of written procedures for determining the allowability of cost. Cause The City did not review the administrative requirements to ensure compliance with the financial management section of the Uniform Guidance. Effect The City did not comply with 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7). Context The Government did not have written procedures for determining the allowability of costs of federal expenditures in accordance with 2 CFR 200.302(b)(7). Recommendation Management should review the administrative requirements for federal programs to ensure compliance with all federal award requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Management will review the administrative requirements for federal programs to ensure compliance with all federal award requirements. Prior to funding, all proposed activities will be reviewed for compliance with the appropriate federal requirements.

Corrective Action Plan

Compliance Findings - United States Department of the Treasury Coronavirus Relief Fund (21.019): 2020-013 Written Policies for Federal Programs Finding: The City was unable to provide documentation of written procedures for determining the allowability of cost. Corrective Action Plan: Management should review the administrative requirements for federal programs to ensure compliance with all federal award requirements.

About Other →
2020-014
Special Tests & Provisions
OTHER MATTERS

2020-014 Maintaining Applicant Documentation Fiscal year finding initially occurred: 2020 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers (14.871): Criteria In accordance with Title 24 part 982.5(C) and Title 24 part 982.158(E)(3), the public housing agency is required to maintain the housing voucher application during the term of each assisted lease and for at least three years thereafter. Condition The City was unable to provide the housing voucher application for one of the five new participants examined. Cause The City did not adhere to their administrative plan by maintaining the required applicant documentation in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Effect The City did not comply with Title 24 part 982.5(C) and Title 24 part 982.158(E)(3). Context The City was unable to provide a participant application that entered into the program during the fiscal year. Recommendation Management should review their procedures to ensure the required documentation is maintained for each participant. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Management will review their policies and procedures to ensure the required documentation is maintained for each participant in the program.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2020-014 Maintaining Applicant Documentation Fiscal year finding initially occurred: 2020 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers (14.871): Criteria In accordance with Title 24 part 982.5(C) and Title 24 part 982.158(E)(3), the public housing agency is required to maintain the housing voucher application during the term of each assisted lease and for at least three years thereafter. Condition The City was unable to provide the housing voucher application for one of the five new participants examined. Cause The City did not adhere to their administrative plan by maintaining the required applicant documentation in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Effect The City did not comply with Title 24 part 982.5(C) and Title 24 part 982.158(E)(3). Context The City was unable to provide a participant application that entered into the program during the fiscal year. Recommendation Management should review their procedures to ensure the required documentation is maintained for each participant. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Management will review their policies and procedures to ensure the required documentation is maintained for each participant in the program.

Corrective Action Plan

United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers (14.871): 2020-014 Maintaining Applicant Documentation Finding: The City was unable to provide the housing voucher application for one of the five new participants examined. Corrective Action Plan: Management will review their policies and procedures to ensure the required documentation is maintained for each participant in the program.

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2020-015
Special Tests & Provisions
OTHER MATTERS

2020-015 Payments Under Housing Assistance Program (HAP) Contract Fiscal year finding initially occurred: 2020 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers (14.871): Criteria In accordance with Title 24 part 982.311(a), housing assistance payments must be paid in accordance with the terms of the HAP contract. Condition The City remitted HAP payments to a participant that were not within the terms of the HAP contract. Cause The City?s employee entered an incorrect HAP payment value when entering the HAP contract information into the HUD program. Effect The HAP contract terms stated that the HAP payment should be in the amount of $597 when the actual payment requested and made was in the amount of $540. Context One out of the nine participants examined for eligibility resulted in one participant that was not being paid in accordance with the HAP contract. Recommendation Management should review their policies and procedures to include a secondary review of all data entered into the HUD program for new participants. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Management will implement procedures to enhance the controls over data entry into the HUD program. Procedures will include the review and approval of data entered into the HUD program for new participants.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2020-015 Payments Under Housing Assistance Program (HAP) Contract Fiscal year finding initially occurred: 2020 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers (14.871): Criteria In accordance with Title 24 part 982.311(a), housing assistance payments must be paid in accordance with the terms of the HAP contract. Condition The City remitted HAP payments to a participant that were not within the terms of the HAP contract. Cause The City?s employee entered an incorrect HAP payment value when entering the HAP contract information into the HUD program. Effect The HAP contract terms stated that the HAP payment should be in the amount of $597 when the actual payment requested and made was in the amount of $540. Context One out of the nine participants examined for eligibility resulted in one participant that was not being paid in accordance with the HAP contract. Recommendation Management should review their policies and procedures to include a secondary review of all data entered into the HUD program for new participants. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Management will implement procedures to enhance the controls over data entry into the HUD program. Procedures will include the review and approval of data entered into the HUD program for new participants.

Corrective Action Plan

United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers (14.871): 2020-015 Payments Under Housing Assistance Program (HAP) Contract Finding: The City remitted HAP payments to a participant that were not within the terms of the HAP contract. Corrective Action Plan: Management will implement procedures to enhance the controls over data entry into the HUD program. Procedures will include the review and approval of data entered into the HUD program for new participants.

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2020-016
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Internal Control Findings ? 2020-016 Inadequate Controls Over Timesheets Fiscal year finding initially occurred: 2019 Coronavirus Relief Fund (21.019): See Internal Control Finding 2020-009.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Internal Control Findings ? 2020-016 Inadequate Controls Over Timesheets Fiscal year finding initially occurred: 2019 Coronavirus Relief Fund (21.019): See Internal Control Finding 2020-009.

Corrective Action Plan

United States Department of the Treasury Coronavirus Relief Fund (21.019): 2020-016 Inadequate Controls Over Timesheets See Internal Control Finding 2020-009.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2020-017
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Internal Control Findings ? 2020-017 Payments Under Housing Assistance Program (HAP) Contract Fiscal year finding initially occurred: 2020 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers (14.871): See Compliance Finding 2020-015.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Internal Control Findings ? 2020-017 Payments Under Housing Assistance Program (HAP) Contract Fiscal year finding initially occurred: 2020 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers (14.871): See Compliance Finding 2020-015.

Corrective Action Plan

United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers (14.871): 2020-017 Payments Under Housing Assistance Program (HAP) Contract See Compliance Finding 2020-015.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2018-06-30

$1,059,033 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 10, 2019 — management decision was due July 10, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

$1,671,104 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 20, 2017 — management decision was due June 20, 2018.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Louisiana

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.