← Back to home

St. Landry Parish School BoardLocal Government

EIN: 726001257

UEI: NE8JMHMNMJ11

Audited by: Kolder, Slaven, & Company, LLC

Cognizant agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

St. Landry Parish School Board10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$59.3M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$59,331,221 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on February 12, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 12, 2026 (18 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

$79,115,289 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 30, 2024 — management decision was due June 30, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

$62,465,746 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 16, 2024 — management decision was due August 16, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$49,815,413 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 15, 2022 — management decision was due June 15, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$45,843,254 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 26, 2021 — management decision was due June 26, 2022.

2021-005
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

Compliance Finding and Internal Control ?U.S. DEPARTMETN OF AGRICULTURE2021-005 Noncompliance with Recordkeeping RequirementsNational School Lunch Program Assistance Listing No. 10.555National School Breakfast Program Assistance Listing No. 10.553Fiscal year finding initially occurred: 2021CONDITION: Four out of ten child nutrition program reimbursement requests were tested. Productionrecords for breakfast and lunch were inaccurate and incomplete, and meal counts could not be verified asrequired by 7 CFR part 225.15(b) and (c).CRITERIA: 7 CFR part 225.15(b) and (c) states, in part that records of participation and of preparationof meals shall be maintained to demonstrate positive action toward meeting program objectives.Sponsors shall maintain accurate records justifying all meals claimed and documenting that all programfunds were spent only on allowable child nutrition program costs.CAUSE: The cause of the noncompliance is related to poor oversight controls over the child nutritionprogram monthly claim reports.EFFECT: The effect of the noncompliance resulted in meal requests for reimbursement to beoverclaimed. The School Board was required to amend the incorrect reimbursement requests and repayany overclaim amounts.QUESTIONED COSTS: As a result of this improper documentation, $194,779 is considered to bequestioned costs. This amount represents approximately 2.8% of total program revenues received.RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the School Board enforce stricter monitoring andreviewing controls to more accurately monitor the monthly claim reimbursement process.MANAGEMENT?S CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN: The School Board has amended the claimsreimbursement requests identified as inaccurate and repaid any overclaim to the oversight agency.Controls over production reports are being evaluated and amended as necessary. All child nutritionprogram employees will be provided additional training.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Compliance Finding and Internal Control ?U.S. DEPARTMETN OF AGRICULTURE2021-005 Noncompliance with Recordkeeping RequirementsNational School Lunch Program Assistance Listing No. 10.555National School Breakfast Program Assistance Listing No. 10.553Fiscal year finding initially occurred: 2021CONDITION: Four out of ten child nutrition program reimbursement requests were tested. Productionrecords for breakfast and lunch were inaccurate and incomplete, and meal counts could not be verified asrequired by 7 CFR part 225.15(b) and (c).CRITERIA: 7 CFR part 225.15(b) and (c) states, in part that records of participation and of preparationof meals shall be maintained to demonstrate positive action toward meeting program objectives.Sponsors shall maintain accurate records justifying all meals claimed and documenting that all programfunds were spent only on allowable child nutrition program costs.CAUSE: The cause of the noncompliance is related to poor oversight controls over the child nutritionprogram monthly claim reports.EFFECT: The effect of the noncompliance resulted in meal requests for reimbursement to beoverclaimed. The School Board was required to amend the incorrect reimbursement requests and repayany overclaim amounts.QUESTIONED COSTS: As a result of this improper documentation, $194,779 is considered to bequestioned costs. This amount represents approximately 2.8% of total program revenues received.RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the School Board enforce stricter monitoring andreviewing controls to more accurately monitor the monthly claim reimbursement process.MANAGEMENT?S CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN: The School Board has amended the claimsreimbursement requests identified as inaccurate and repaid any overclaim to the oversight agency.Controls over production reports are being evaluated and amended as necessary. All child nutritionprogram employees will be provided additional training.

Corrective Action Plan

MANAGEMENT?S CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN: The School Board has amended the claimsreimbursement requests identified as inaccurate and repaid any overclaim to the oversight agency.Controls over production reports are being evaluated and amended as necessary. All child nutritionprogram employees will be provided additional training.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2020-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$30,757,724 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 17, 2020 — management decision was due June 17, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$33,104,541 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$23,912,852 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 25, 2018 — management decision was due June 25, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

$22,311,024 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 6, 2018 — management decision was due July 6, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

$22,630,085 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 15, 2016 — management decision was due June 15, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.