← Back to home

Richland Parish School BoardLocal Government

EIN: 726001154

UEI: CTHVLKY5PGL9

Audited by: Carr, Riggs & Ingram, L.L.C.

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

Richland Parish School Board9 audit years2 findings
9
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$10.8M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$10,847,639 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on May 19, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 19, 2025 (295 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →

FY 2023-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$15,431,254 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 19, 2025 — management decision was due November 19, 2025.

FY 2022-06-30

$12,556,631 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 6, 2024 — management decision was due March 6, 2025.

FY 2021-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$10,024,442 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 11, 2022 — management decision was due March 11, 2023.

2021-004
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Reference # and title: 2021-004 Internal Controls Over Allowable Costs and Cost Principles CFDA#, Federal Award Title, Federal Agency, Federal Award # and Year, and the Name of the Pass- Through Entity: This finding relates to COVID 19 Education Stabilization, CFDA #84.425D, for Federal Award Year 2020, received from Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education, passed through the Louisiana Department of Education. Criteria or specific requirement: Payments to vendors should be supported by proper documentation including evidence that goods are received before payment is made. Condition found: A sample of 24 vendor checks was selected for testing the Education Stabilization grant. Five of these checks, which were for the purchase of technology equipment such as computers, did not have documentation with the invoice that the items were received. These checks totaled over $200,000. The Federal Programs Director provided various sources of information to verify that the items were received. Also, a check for $25,074.80 was written in July 2020 for the purchase of Chromebooks that were on back order. These Chromebooks were never received. The vendor refunded the money in March 2021. Context: A total of 41 haphazardly selected payroll and vendor disbursements were tested. Vendor disbursements made up 24 checks in the sample. Possible asserted effect (cause and effect): Cause: Documentation for receipt of goods is not always attached to the invoice and purchase order. The central receiving position is responsible for matching the purchase order with the items received. The process was to forward these receiving reports to accounts payable before the vendor was paid. The receiving documentation was not attached to the vendor disbursements noted above. Effect: Evidence of receipt of goods was obtained from other sources. One vendor was paid for items that were never received. Recommendation to prevent future occurrences: The School Board should establish quality control procedures to ensure proper documentation is obtained to support each disbursement. This should include evidence that goods were received. Payment should not be made until all documentation is obtained. Origination date and prior year reference (if applicable): This finding is first reported in the current fiscal year end. View of Responsible Official: The Richland Parish School Board has performed staff in-services to address this matter. Staff members were reminded of their responsibilities and how their jobs affect others. We have also hired a new purchasing secretary who is utilizing the receiving features in our software package.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Reference # and title: 2021-004 Internal Controls Over Allowable Costs and Cost Principles CFDA#, Federal Award Title, Federal Agency, Federal Award # and Year, and the Name of the Pass- Through Entity: This finding relates to COVID 19 Education Stabilization, CFDA #84.425D, for Federal Award Year 2020, received from Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education, passed through the Louisiana Department of Education. Criteria or specific requirement: Payments to vendors should be supported by proper documentation including evidence that goods are received before payment is made. Condition found: A sample of 24 vendor checks was selected for testing the Education Stabilization grant. Five of these checks, which were for the purchase of technology equipment such as computers, did not have documentation with the invoice that the items were received. These checks totaled over $200,000. The Federal Programs Director provided various sources of information to verify that the items were received. Also, a check for $25,074.80 was written in July 2020 for the purchase of Chromebooks that were on back order. These Chromebooks were never received. The vendor refunded the money in March 2021. Context: A total of 41 haphazardly selected payroll and vendor disbursements were tested. Vendor disbursements made up 24 checks in the sample. Possible asserted effect (cause and effect): Cause: Documentation for receipt of goods is not always attached to the invoice and purchase order. The central receiving position is responsible for matching the purchase order with the items received. The process was to forward these receiving reports to accounts payable before the vendor was paid. The receiving documentation was not attached to the vendor disbursements noted above. Effect: Evidence of receipt of goods was obtained from other sources. One vendor was paid for items that were never received. Recommendation to prevent future occurrences: The School Board should establish quality control procedures to ensure proper documentation is obtained to support each disbursement. This should include evidence that goods were received. Payment should not be made until all documentation is obtained. Origination date and prior year reference (if applicable): This finding is first reported in the current fiscal year end. View of Responsible Official: The Richland Parish School Board has performed staff in-services to address this matter. Staff members were reminded of their responsibilities and how their jobs affect others. We have also hired a new purchasing secretary who is utilizing the receiving features in our software package.

Corrective Action Plan

The Richland Parish School Board has performed staff in-services to address this matter. Staff members were reminded of their responsibilities and how their jobs affect others. We have also hired a new purchasing secretary who is utilizing the receiving features in our software package.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2020-06-30

$6,521,598 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 3, 2021 — management decision was due February 3, 2022.

FY 2019-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$6,488,931 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 9, 2020 — management decision was due January 9, 2021.

FY 2018-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$5,881,456 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 11, 2019 — management decision was due August 11, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,905,849 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 18, 2018 — management decision was due March 18, 2019.

2017-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,591,547 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 30, 2017 — management decision was due July 30, 2017.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Louisiana

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.