← Back to home

PLAQUEMINES PARISH GOVERNMENTLocal Government

EIN: 726001090

UEI: K6AYEHZALMR7

Audited by: Kolder, Slaven & Company LLC CPAS

Oversight agency: 12 [Department of Defense]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

PLAQUEMINES PARISH GOVERNMENT10 audit years2 findings
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$19.5M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-12-31

$19,450,209 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on July 6, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by January 6, 2027 (125 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-12-31

UNMODIFIED OPINION, ADVERSE OPINIONMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$25,899,486 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 9, 2025 — management decision was due January 9, 2026.

FY 2023-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$15,653,336 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 26, 2024 — management decision was due January 26, 2025.

FY 2022-12-31

UNMODIFIED OPINION, ADVERSE OPINION$45,329,289 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 25, 2023 — management decision was due January 25, 2024.

FY 2021-12-31

UNMODIFIED OPINION, ADVERSE OPINION$16,552,013 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 1, 2022 — management decision was due February 1, 2023.

FY 2020-12-31

UNMODIFIED OPINION, ADVERSE OPINION$29,264,907 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 15, 2021 — management decision was due May 15, 2022.

2020-001
Period of Performance
MATERIAL WEAKNESSOTHER MATTERS

2020-001 ? Failure to Verify Dates of Periods Worked Used for Reimbursement Requests Year Initially Occurring: 2020 COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS: Period of Performance FEDERAL AGENCY: United States Department of Transportation Federal Transit Cluster ? CFDA/Assistance Listing 20.507 ? COVID-19- Federal Transit Formula Grants QUESTIONED COSTS: None CONDITION: The Parish failed to detect that amounts requested for reimbursement were related to check dates instead of dates within a certain pay period. CRITERIA: Federal regulations (2 CFR 200.303) require non-federal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with federal laws, regulations, and program requirements. CAUSE: The Parish obtained its data for the reimbursement request from a Payroll History Report from its payroll software, which generated salary amount by check date instead of dates within a pay period. The Parish believed that these dates pertained to dates worked. However, the dates pertained to check dates within the specified period. EFFECT: Utilizing reports with data for a certain check date instead of dates within certain pay periods could cause the Parish to request reimbursement of expenditures outside of the period of performance. CONTEXT: Fifteen payroll transactions requested for reimbursement were selected for testing out of a population of 149 transactions. Reports provided as supporting documentation for all 15 transactions tested were based on check dates instead of dates within a certain pay period. RECOMMENDATION: Procedures should be established to ensure that future payroll related reimbursement requests are based on dates worked and not check dates. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See corrective action plan for current audit findings.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2020-001 ? Failure to Verify Dates of Periods Worked Used for Reimbursement Requests Year Initially Occurring: 2020 COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS: Period of Performance FEDERAL AGENCY: United States Department of Transportation Federal Transit Cluster ? CFDA/Assistance Listing 20.507 ? COVID-19- Federal Transit Formula Grants QUESTIONED COSTS: None CONDITION: The Parish failed to detect that amounts requested for reimbursement were related to check dates instead of dates within a certain pay period. CRITERIA: Federal regulations (2 CFR 200.303) require non-federal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal control designed to reasonably ensure compliance with federal laws, regulations, and program requirements. CAUSE: The Parish obtained its data for the reimbursement request from a Payroll History Report from its payroll software, which generated salary amount by check date instead of dates within a pay period. The Parish believed that these dates pertained to dates worked. However, the dates pertained to check dates within the specified period. EFFECT: Utilizing reports with data for a certain check date instead of dates within certain pay periods could cause the Parish to request reimbursement of expenditures outside of the period of performance. CONTEXT: Fifteen payroll transactions requested for reimbursement were selected for testing out of a population of 149 transactions. Reports provided as supporting documentation for all 15 transactions tested were based on check dates instead of dates within a certain pay period. RECOMMENDATION: Procedures should be established to ensure that future payroll related reimbursement requests are based on dates worked and not check dates. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS: See corrective action plan for current audit findings.

Corrective Action Plan

2020-001 Failure to Verify Dates of Periods Worked Used for Reimbursement Requests Planned Corrective Action: The Parish will establish the necessary procedures to ensure that all payroll related reimbursement requests are based on dates worked and not check dates. This includes creating special payroll reports listed by specific date ranges rather than by check date. Plaquemines Parish contact responsible for corrective action: Hilda lott-Piaquemines Parish Grants Administrator Ant icipated Completion Date for Corrective Action: August 24, 2021

About Period of Performance →

FY 2019-12-31

UNMODIFIED OPINION, ADVERSE OPINION$28,813,766 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 11, 2020 — management decision was due April 11, 2021.

FY 2018-12-31

UNMODIFIED OPINION, ADVERSE OPINION$25,304,028 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on July 22, 2019 — management decision was due January 22, 2020.

2018-001
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →

FY 2017-12-31

UNMODIFIED OPINION, ADVERSE OPINION$17,546,097 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 16, 2018 — management decision was due January 16, 2019.

FY 2016-12-31

UNMODIFIED OPINION, ADVERSE OPINION$19,000,166 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 17, 2017 — management decision was due January 17, 2018.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Louisiana

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.