← Back to home

Coos County Airport DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 721557818

UEI: KT82L4RD4261

Audited by: Umpqua Valley Financial

Oversight agency: 20 [Department of Transportation]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Coos County Airport District8 audit years1 findings
8
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.8M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$1,768,134 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on July 20, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by January 20, 2027 (139 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

$1,247,335 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 23, 2025 — management decision was due January 23, 2026.

FY 2023-06-30

$4,787,417 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 20, 2024 — management decision was due September 20, 2024.

2023-001
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

SA2023 - 001 – MATERIAL WEAKNESS FEDERAL PROGRAM: 20.106 Airport Improvement Program SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT: Federal expenditures related to the program should be reported in the fiscal year they are expended. CONDITION: Adequate controls were not in place to ensure the schedule of expenditures of federal awards was accurate at year end. QUESTIONED COST: None noted CONTEXT: This finding is limited to this major program and the context noted in the condition. EFFECT: Without adequate controls or procedures in place to ensure accuracy of the schedule of expenditures of federal awards there exists the risk of material misstatement. CAUSE: The District did not have adequate knowledge for reporting their federal award expenditures for compilation and reporting. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the District implement procedures to ensure accuracy of the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. VIEWS OF RESPONISBLE OFFICIALS: Though not identified specifically, there is a correlation to staff turnover in key roles during the fiscal year under audit, and this federal award finding. Management oversight is a key component of internal controls. The District believes with appropriate staffing at all levels allows internal controls to function as designed. Beyond that, there are measures under consideration which intend to mitigate this finding for the subsequent fiscal year end audit, such as:  Review and Reconciliation of Reported Expenditures – this process can be conducted on a more frequent basis than only at closed of year end. This will function as an opportunity to for both staff and management to become overly familiar with the transactions as they occur, the procedure for recording, and the preparation of the schedule. Year-end preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) will then prove more routine and errors will be more readily apparent.  Enhanced Controls and Processes – though the District maintains, reviews and updates the Internal Control Document regularly, there are often opportunities to enhance controls which when operating as designed will detect misstatement. Care will be taken to review processes and ascertain where additional controls can be put in place to create appropriate checks and balances in processes.  Staff Training – it is the intent of the District to ensure those charged with accounting tasks, as well as those charged with review of accounting data and financial statements have the appropriate experience. Assessment may be necessary to determine if opportunities exist for additional training which will ensure appropriate accounting procedures, including financial statement and SEFA preparation are done accurately and within generally accepted accounting practices.  Engagement with Federal Awarding Agencies – opportunities may arise to converse federal awarding agencies about recording and reporting guidelines; as needed, staff may need additional training or guidance to ensure compliance with all guidelines.  Ongoing Monitoring – creating or updating existing monitoring processes and schedules can ensure that review and validation of the accuracy of expenditure reporting remains in continuous compliance with requirements.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

SA2023 - 001 – MATERIAL WEAKNESS FEDERAL PROGRAM: 20.106 Airport Improvement Program SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT: Federal expenditures related to the program should be reported in the fiscal year they are expended. CONDITION: Adequate controls were not in place to ensure the schedule of expenditures of federal awards was accurate at year end. QUESTIONED COST: None noted CONTEXT: This finding is limited to this major program and the context noted in the condition. EFFECT: Without adequate controls or procedures in place to ensure accuracy of the schedule of expenditures of federal awards there exists the risk of material misstatement. CAUSE: The District did not have adequate knowledge for reporting their federal award expenditures for compilation and reporting. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the District implement procedures to ensure accuracy of the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. VIEWS OF RESPONISBLE OFFICIALS: Though not identified specifically, there is a correlation to staff turnover in key roles during the fiscal year under audit, and this federal award finding. Management oversight is a key component of internal controls. The District believes with appropriate staffing at all levels allows internal controls to function as designed. Beyond that, there are measures under consideration which intend to mitigate this finding for the subsequent fiscal year end audit, such as:  Review and Reconciliation of Reported Expenditures – this process can be conducted on a more frequent basis than only at closed of year end. This will function as an opportunity to for both staff and management to become overly familiar with the transactions as they occur, the procedure for recording, and the preparation of the schedule. Year-end preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) will then prove more routine and errors will be more readily apparent.  Enhanced Controls and Processes – though the District maintains, reviews and updates the Internal Control Document regularly, there are often opportunities to enhance controls which when operating as designed will detect misstatement. Care will be taken to review processes and ascertain where additional controls can be put in place to create appropriate checks and balances in processes.  Staff Training – it is the intent of the District to ensure those charged with accounting tasks, as well as those charged with review of accounting data and financial statements have the appropriate experience. Assessment may be necessary to determine if opportunities exist for additional training which will ensure appropriate accounting procedures, including financial statement and SEFA preparation are done accurately and within generally accepted accounting practices.  Engagement with Federal Awarding Agencies – opportunities may arise to converse federal awarding agencies about recording and reporting guidelines; as needed, staff may need additional training or guidance to ensure compliance with all guidelines.  Ongoing Monitoring – creating or updating existing monitoring processes and schedules can ensure that review and validation of the accuracy of expenditure reporting remains in continuous compliance with requirements.

Corrective Action Plan

Coos County Airport District (District) respectfully presents the following corrective action plan in response to deficiencies reported in the District’s June 30, 2023 audit conducted by the independent auditing firm Pauly, Rogers and Co., P.C., Tigard, Oregon. The audit identified both a material weakness and a significant deficiency: • Material Weakness: During testing of the SEFA, it was observed that the amount originally reported for AIP 44 was materially overstated. We recommend that the SEFA only reflect the current year expenditures. Corrective action plan: The District will only record the amount on the SEFA reflected in the current year expenditures.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,438,733 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 2, 2023 — management decision was due November 2, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,144,966 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 28, 2021 — management decision was due June 28, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,746,384 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 4, 2021 — management decision was due July 4, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

$767,228 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 3, 2020 — management decision was due August 3, 2020.

FY 2016-06-30

$799,952 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 16, 2017 — management decision was due July 16, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Oregon

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.