← Back to home

University of Holy CrossNon-Profit

EIN: 720642832

UEI: P2BZGDPNNQ41

Audited by: EISNERAMPER LLP

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

University of Holy Cross10 audit years3 findings1 repeat
10
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$7.5M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,464,333 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 26, 2026 (22 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-002
Eligibility
QUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

In our sample of 60 student financial aid award recipients, we identified 1 incidence in which the student received a direct subsidized loan in excess of their financial need as determined by the institution’s COA calculation and the student’s SAI. The student’s total aid package exceeded the allowable financial need by $4,948. Cause: After the University’s initial financial need calculation was completed, the student received a scholarship that reduced their financial need. The University failed to properly update the student’s COA and/or other estimated financial assistance before disbursing the direct subsidized loan funds. Effect: Awarding aid in excess of a student's financial need results in noncompliance with federal regulations governing Title IV programs. The institution may be required to return the overawarded portion of direct subsidized loan funds to the U.S. Department of Education. Continued noncompliance may increase the risk of federal sanctions or additional oversight. Questioned Costs: $4,948 Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management strengthen controls over the financial aid awarding process, including implementing a more robust review of COA, SAI, and other estimated financial assistance prior to finalizing loan disbursements in order to not overaward financial assistance to students.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: In accordance with the U.S. Department of Education’s regulations, awards must be coordinated among the various Title IV programs and with other federal and nonfederal aid (need and non-need based aid) to ensure that total aid awarded is not in excess of the student’s financial need or cost of attendance (“COA”) (34 CFR 668.42, FWS, and FSEOG, 34 CFR 673.5 and 673.6; Direct Loan, 34 CFR 685.301). The determination of need-based student financial aid award amounts is based on financial need. Financial need is defined as the student’s COA minus the student’s student aid index (“SAI”) and other financial assistance. An overaward exists when a student’s financial aid exceeds the student’s need. Universe / Population: The universe / population for Eligibility is 567 student financial aid award recipients for the year ended June 30, 2025. We selected 60 student financial aid award recipients for testing of eligibility compliance requirements applicable to the program. Condition: In our sample of 60 student financial aid award recipients, we identified 1 incidence in which the student received a direct subsidized loan in excess of their financial need as determined by the institution’s COA calculation and the student’s SAI. The student’s total aid package exceeded the allowable financial need by $4,948. Cause: After the University’s initial financial need calculation was completed, the student received a scholarship that reduced their financial need. The University failed to properly update the student’s COA and/or other estimated financial assistance before disbursing the direct subsidized loan funds. Effect: Awarding aid in excess of a student's financial need results in noncompliance with federal regulations governing Title IV programs. The institution may be required to return the overawarded portion of direct subsidized loan funds to the U.S. Department of Education. Continued noncompliance may increase the risk of federal sanctions or additional oversight. Questioned Costs: $4,948 Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management strengthen controls over the financial aid awarding process, including implementing a more robust review of COA, SAI, and other estimated financial assistance prior to finalizing loan disbursements in order to not overaward financial assistance to students.

Corrective Action Plan

The Financial Aid Office identified suspicious activity in FY2025 and collaborated with IT and Admissions to verify the integrity of financial aid applications. The Financial Aid Office has implemented additional procedures and reporting controls to strengthen the financial aid awarding process. During the packaging process, a report is generated and reviewed to verify the Cost of Attendance (COA), Student Aid Index (SAI), and any other estimated financial assistance prior to loan disbursement. This review helps ensure that total financial aid does not exceed allowable limits and prevents the overawarding of aid to students.

About Eligibility →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,539,478 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 20, 2024 — management decision was due June 20, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,451,584 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 4, 2024 — management decision was due July 4, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$11,426,172 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 26, 2023 — management decision was due August 26, 2023.

2022-001
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

The University did not submit the January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021 Annual Report by the grantee submission deadline. The annual report had a submission deadline of May 6, 2022 and was submitted on May 11, 2022. Cause: The University lacks an established control monitoring timely submission of Annual Reports. Effect: Failure to comply with the reporting requirements may result in sanctions, including: losing access to HEERF grant funds as a result of the grantee?s noncompliance with its reporting requirements as specified by their HEERF Certification and Agreement or Supplemental Agreement. Recommendation: The University should establish a formalized control to monitor timely submission of Annual Reports. Repeat finding: No.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-001 Special Reporting U.S. Department of Education 84.425E, 84.425F, 84.425M COVID-19 - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF 2021-2022 Award Year Questioned Costs: None Criteria: The U.S. Department of Education sets the criteria for HEERF Annual Performance Reports (APRs). This report is due annually from HEERF grantees. Annual Reports must be submitted and reviewed within a certain timeframe set by the U.S. Department of Education. Universe / Population: The universe / population is one Annual Report submitted during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. P&N selected the one Annual Report for testing of reporting compliance requirements applicable to the program. Condition: The University did not submit the January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021 Annual Report by the grantee submission deadline. The annual report had a submission deadline of May 6, 2022 and was submitted on May 11, 2022. Cause: The University lacks an established control monitoring timely submission of Annual Reports. Effect: Failure to comply with the reporting requirements may result in sanctions, including: losing access to HEERF grant funds as a result of the grantee?s noncompliance with its reporting requirements as specified by their HEERF Certification and Agreement or Supplemental Agreement. Recommendation: The University should establish a formalized control to monitor timely submission of Annual Reports. Repeat finding: No.

Corrective Action Plan

University of Holy Cross will develop a formal process to monitor the submission of all required reports to ensure that all reports are submitted timely in compliance with the requirements of Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) terms and agreements.

About Reporting →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$11,692,328 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 2, 2021 — management decision was due June 2, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$10,682,912 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 19, 2021 — management decision was due October 19, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$11,077,308 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 7, 2020 — management decision was due July 7, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

$11,277,989 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 5, 2018 — management decision was due June 5, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

$11,298,266 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 8, 2018 — management decision was due August 8, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

$10,430,640 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 29, 2017 — management decision was due July 29, 2017.

2016-001
Special Tests & Provisions
MODIFIED OPINIONSIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-001

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-001

About Special Tests and Provisions →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Louisiana

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.