EIN: 720642832
UEI: P2BZGDPNNQ41
Audited by: EISNERAMPER LLP
Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 26, 2026 (22 days from today).
What is a management decision? →In our sample of 60 student financial aid award recipients, we identified 1 incidence in which the student received a direct subsidized loan in excess of their financial need as determined by the institution’s COA calculation and the student’s SAI. The student’s total aid package exceeded the allowable financial need by $4,948. Cause: After the University’s initial financial need calculation was completed, the student received a scholarship that reduced their financial need. The University failed to properly update the student’s COA and/or other estimated financial assistance before disbursing the direct subsidized loan funds. Effect: Awarding aid in excess of a student's financial need results in noncompliance with federal regulations governing Title IV programs. The institution may be required to return the overawarded portion of direct subsidized loan funds to the U.S. Department of Education. Continued noncompliance may increase the risk of federal sanctions or additional oversight. Questioned Costs: $4,948 Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management strengthen controls over the financial aid awarding process, including implementing a more robust review of COA, SAI, and other estimated financial assistance prior to finalizing loan disbursements in order to not overaward financial assistance to students.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: In accordance with the U.S. Department of Education’s regulations, awards must be coordinated among the various Title IV programs and with other federal and nonfederal aid (need and non-need based aid) to ensure that total aid awarded is not in excess of the student’s financial need or cost of attendance (“COA”) (34 CFR 668.42, FWS, and FSEOG, 34 CFR 673.5 and 673.6; Direct Loan, 34 CFR 685.301). The determination of need-based student financial aid award amounts is based on financial need. Financial need is defined as the student’s COA minus the student’s student aid index (“SAI”) and other financial assistance. An overaward exists when a student’s financial aid exceeds the student’s need. Universe / Population: The universe / population for Eligibility is 567 student financial aid award recipients for the year ended June 30, 2025. We selected 60 student financial aid award recipients for testing of eligibility compliance requirements applicable to the program. Condition: In our sample of 60 student financial aid award recipients, we identified 1 incidence in which the student received a direct subsidized loan in excess of their financial need as determined by the institution’s COA calculation and the student’s SAI. The student’s total aid package exceeded the allowable financial need by $4,948. Cause: After the University’s initial financial need calculation was completed, the student received a scholarship that reduced their financial need. The University failed to properly update the student’s COA and/or other estimated financial assistance before disbursing the direct subsidized loan funds. Effect: Awarding aid in excess of a student's financial need results in noncompliance with federal regulations governing Title IV programs. The institution may be required to return the overawarded portion of direct subsidized loan funds to the U.S. Department of Education. Continued noncompliance may increase the risk of federal sanctions or additional oversight. Questioned Costs: $4,948 Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that management strengthen controls over the financial aid awarding process, including implementing a more robust review of COA, SAI, and other estimated financial assistance prior to finalizing loan disbursements in order to not overaward financial assistance to students.
The Financial Aid Office identified suspicious activity in FY2025 and collaborated with IT and Admissions to verify the integrity of financial aid applications. The Financial Aid Office has implemented additional procedures and reporting controls to strengthen the financial aid awarding process. During the packaging process, a report is generated and reviewed to verify the Cost of Attendance (COA), Student Aid Index (SAI), and any other estimated financial assistance prior to loan disbursement. This review helps ensure that total financial aid does not exceed allowable limits and prevents the overawarding of aid to students.
FAC accepted this audit on December 20, 2024 — management decision was due June 20, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on January 4, 2024 — management decision was due July 4, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on February 26, 2023 — management decision was due August 26, 2023.
The University did not submit the January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021 Annual Report by the grantee submission deadline. The annual report had a submission deadline of May 6, 2022 and was submitted on May 11, 2022. Cause: The University lacks an established control monitoring timely submission of Annual Reports. Effect: Failure to comply with the reporting requirements may result in sanctions, including: losing access to HEERF grant funds as a result of the grantee?s noncompliance with its reporting requirements as specified by their HEERF Certification and Agreement or Supplemental Agreement. Recommendation: The University should establish a formalized control to monitor timely submission of Annual Reports. Repeat finding: No.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2022-001 Special Reporting U.S. Department of Education 84.425E, 84.425F, 84.425M COVID-19 - Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF 2021-2022 Award Year Questioned Costs: None Criteria: The U.S. Department of Education sets the criteria for HEERF Annual Performance Reports (APRs). This report is due annually from HEERF grantees. Annual Reports must be submitted and reviewed within a certain timeframe set by the U.S. Department of Education. Universe / Population: The universe / population is one Annual Report submitted during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. P&N selected the one Annual Report for testing of reporting compliance requirements applicable to the program. Condition: The University did not submit the January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021 Annual Report by the grantee submission deadline. The annual report had a submission deadline of May 6, 2022 and was submitted on May 11, 2022. Cause: The University lacks an established control monitoring timely submission of Annual Reports. Effect: Failure to comply with the reporting requirements may result in sanctions, including: losing access to HEERF grant funds as a result of the grantee?s noncompliance with its reporting requirements as specified by their HEERF Certification and Agreement or Supplemental Agreement. Recommendation: The University should establish a formalized control to monitor timely submission of Annual Reports. Repeat finding: No.
University of Holy Cross will develop a formal process to monitor the submission of all required reports to ensure that all reports are submitted timely in compliance with the requirements of Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund (HEERF) terms and agreements.
FAC accepted this audit on December 2, 2021 — management decision was due June 2, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on April 19, 2021 — management decision was due October 19, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on January 7, 2020 — management decision was due July 7, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on December 5, 2018 — management decision was due June 5, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on February 8, 2018 — management decision was due August 8, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on January 29, 2017 — management decision was due July 29, 2017.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2015-001
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Louisiana →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.