← Back to home

White Castle Housing AuthorityLocal Government

EIN: 720634239

UEI: XHFMVAB83EB4

Audited by: Mike Estes, P.C.

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

White Castle Housing Authority3 audit years1 findings
3
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.1M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-09-30

$1,077,408 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 30, 2026 (21 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →

FY 2023-09-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$785,509 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 25, 2024 — management decision was due September 25, 2024.

2023-001
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Capital Fund #14.872 Finding 2023-001-Contractor Payments-Special Tests Criteria and Condition Federal regulations require that monitoring of construction or rehabilitation type expenses be documented in writing. Monitoring notes of construction progress, lack of progress, or issues such as contractor delay must be timely made and available for third parties. There are not required forms or format. However, the more they correlate to field reports prepared by architects, the more reliable they are. In addition, contractors must present proof of insurance before they are allowed to work on Authority jobs. Context In the audit year, approximately $71,897 was paid in approximately twenty payments to one contractor. It appears there were no written monitoring notes made on the various type of rehab work. In addition, it appears that the contractor did not present proof of contractor insurance of bond to Authority management. Cause Apparent oversight. Effect Federal regulations were not complied with. In addition, assurance was not as strong as necessary that the work was properly done and in accordance with specifications. Management attests that they timely review the work. However, written documentation is required. In addition, the Authority would likely be liable if the contractor or his employees were injured on the job. Questioned Costs NoneRecommendation Written monitoring reports need to be made on each job. These notes do not need to be extremely detailed. For small type jobs, a punch list type of review with a few words, and initials and dates of the reviewer will suffice. View of Responsible Official I will comply with the auditor’s recommendation.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Capital Fund #14.872 Finding 2023-001-Contractor Payments-Special Tests Criteria and Condition Federal regulations require that monitoring of construction or rehabilitation type expenses be documented in writing. Monitoring notes of construction progress, lack of progress, or issues such as contractor delay must be timely made and available for third parties. There are not required forms or format. However, the more they correlate to field reports prepared by architects, the more reliable they are. In addition, contractors must present proof of insurance before they are allowed to work on Authority jobs. Context In the audit year, approximately $71,897 was paid in approximately twenty payments to one contractor. It appears there were no written monitoring notes made on the various type of rehab work. In addition, it appears that the contractor did not present proof of contractor insurance of bond to Authority management. Cause Apparent oversight. Effect Federal regulations were not complied with. In addition, assurance was not as strong as necessary that the work was properly done and in accordance with specifications. Management attests that they timely review the work. However, written documentation is required. In addition, the Authority would likely be liable if the contractor or his employees were injured on the job. Questioned Costs NoneRecommendation Written monitoring reports need to be made on each job. These notes do not need to be extremely detailed. For small type jobs, a punch list type of review with a few words, and initials and dates of the reviewer will suffice. View of Responsible Official I will comply with the auditor’s recommendation.

Corrective Action Plan

WHITE CASTLE HOUSING AUTHORITY 55050 Veteran St. White Castle, LA 70788 Phone No. (225) 545-3967 Fax No. (225) 545-9951 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF WHITE CASTLE, LOUISIANA CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2023 Corrective Action Plan Finding: Finding 2023-001-Contractor Payments-Special Tests Condition: Federal regulations require that monitoring of construction or rehabilitation type expenses be documented in writing. Monitoring notes of construction progress, lack of progress, or issues such as contractor delay must be timely made and available for third parties. There are not required forms or format. However, the more they correlate to field reports prepared by architects, the more reliable they are. In addition, contractors must present proof of insurance before they are allowed to work on Authority jobs. Corrective Action Planned I will comply with the auditor’s recommendation. Person responsible for corrective action: Don O’Bear, Executive Director Telephone: (225) 545-3967 White Castle Housing Authority Fax: (225) 545-9951 55050 Veteran St. White Castle, LA 70788 Anticipated Completion Date- September 30, 2024

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2019-09-30

$750,015 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 17, 2020 — management decision was due September 17, 2020.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Louisiana

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.