← Back to home

Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Baton Rouge, Inc.Non-Profit

EIN: 720590685

UEI: JC3ZY9XLZNY6

Audited by: EisnerAmper LLP

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Baton Rouge, Inc.10 audit years5 findings1 repeat
10
Audit Years
5
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$9.7M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,680,455 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 18, 2026 (75 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,679,958 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 13, 2025 — management decision was due July 13, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

$6,306,754 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 17, 2024 — management decision was due July 17, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,242,552 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 18, 2023 — management decision was due July 18, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,647,443 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 26, 2022 — management decision was due July 26, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

$1,949,364 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 18, 2021 — management decision was due July 18, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

$1,920,600 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 16, 2020 — management decision was due July 16, 2020.

2019-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2018-002

While there was notable improvement over the SEFA preparation processes over the prior year, timing of adjustments and reconciliation to the general ledger should be performed in a more timely manner. This is a partially repeated finding from the prior year. Effect: The initial SEFA provided to us did not contain the correct amounts of federal expenditures which is the basis used to determine the major federal programs to be audited in a fiscal year. Cause: CCDBR receives multiple sources of revenues, including both federal, state and private contributions, which fund the costs of program operations. The program expenses exceed the actual federal funding received to cover these costs resulting in difficulty in the timely preparation of the SEFA by management. Recommendation: CCDBR should strengthen its controls including its review and approval processes over the information and balances that is accumulated and reported on the SEFA to make sure the expenditures reported are timely and an accurate representation of federal costs. View of Responsible Official: We recognize the necessity of completing the SEFA in a timely fashion. The report will only be submitted after it is reviewed by department directors and senior accounting staff as well as approved by the Executive Director. We will make sure this process is initiated in advance of the audit fieldwork in the future. This year, the impact was minimal, as the agency has traditionally had only one program that qualifies as a major federal program subject to the single program audit; FY?19 was no different.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-001) Preparation of Schedule of Expenditures and Federal Awards Questioned Costs: N/A Criteria: The Uniform Guidance Subpart F section 200.510 requires the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) to include an accurate reporting of federal awards expended based on the terms and conditions of the grants. In order for the SEFA to be prepared accurately and properly report the amounts expended for federal awards, a system of controls should be in existence that includes the timely preparation and review of the amounts reported on the SEFA. Condition: While there was notable improvement over the SEFA preparation processes over the prior year, timing of adjustments and reconciliation to the general ledger should be performed in a more timely manner. This is a partially repeated finding from the prior year. Effect: The initial SEFA provided to us did not contain the correct amounts of federal expenditures which is the basis used to determine the major federal programs to be audited in a fiscal year. Cause: CCDBR receives multiple sources of revenues, including both federal, state and private contributions, which fund the costs of program operations. The program expenses exceed the actual federal funding received to cover these costs resulting in difficulty in the timely preparation of the SEFA by management. Recommendation: CCDBR should strengthen its controls including its review and approval processes over the information and balances that is accumulated and reported on the SEFA to make sure the expenditures reported are timely and an accurate representation of federal costs. View of Responsible Official: We recognize the necessity of completing the SEFA in a timely fashion. The report will only be submitted after it is reviewed by department directors and senior accounting staff as well as approved by the Executive Director. We will make sure this process is initiated in advance of the audit fieldwork in the future. This year, the impact was minimal, as the agency has traditionally had only one program that qualifies as a major federal program subject to the single program audit; FY?19 was no different.

Corrective Action Plan

View of Responsible Official: We recognize the necessity of completing the SEFA in a timely fashion. The report will only be submitted after it is reviewed by department directors and senior accounting staff as well as approved by the Executive Director. We will make sure this process is initiated in advance of the audit fieldwork in the future. This year, the impact was minimal, as the agency has traditionally had only one program that qualifies as a major federal program subject to the single program audit; FY?19 was no different.

Prior Finding References

2018-002

About Other →

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,536,232 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 21, 2019 — management decision was due July 21, 2019.

2018-001
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →
2018-002
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Other →
2018-003
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2017-06-30

$3,234,352 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 11, 2018 — management decision was due July 11, 2018.

2017-001
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →

FY 2016-06-30

$3,512,373 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 19, 2017 — management decision was due July 19, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Louisiana

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.