EIN: 716047915
UEI: KDDGBN6SMLB1
Audited by: Barrale Renshaw CPAs and Advisors LLC
Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 7, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 9, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 9, 2026 (1 day ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on March 20, 2025 — management decision was due September 20, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2024 — management decision was due September 28, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on May 17, 2021 — management decision was due November 17, 2021.
The Authority budgeted and expended funds on lawn maintenance costs, operating costs, in the amount of $22,849 that was charged to BLI #1480. Cause: The annual plan submitted in EPIC listed this activity under BLI #1480 and was charged to this line item to match with the annual plan submitted. Effect: Operating costs should be budgeted and accounted for in BLI #1406. Context: The analysis of expenditures related to lawn care services totaled $22,849. These costs as outlined in the annual plan were charged to BLI #1480. Recommendation: The Authority needs to revise their annual plan to include these costs to BLI Item #1406. Reply: We agree with the finding. We have eliminated all operating costs from our current Five Year Action Plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2020-003 Operating Expenses Criteria ? Capital Fund Guidebook ? Section 2.8, Ineligible Activities #5, Operating Assistance PHAs may not spend Capital Funds on Public Housing operating Assistance, except as provided through transfers to BLI #1406. Condition: The Authority budgeted and expended funds on lawn maintenance costs, operating costs, in the amount of $22,849 that was charged to BLI #1480. Cause: The annual plan submitted in EPIC listed this activity under BLI #1480 and was charged to this line item to match with the annual plan submitted. Effect: Operating costs should be budgeted and accounted for in BLI #1406. Context: The analysis of expenditures related to lawn care services totaled $22,849. These costs as outlined in the annual plan were charged to BLI #1480. Recommendation: The Authority needs to revise their annual plan to include these costs to BLI Item #1406. Reply: We agree with the finding. We have eliminated all operating costs from our current Five Year Action Plan.
2020-003 Operating Expenses Response: We have eliminated all operating costs from our current Five Year Action Plan.
The Authority failed to obtain bids for flooring contracts for rehabbing of the units. A flooring item was included in the annual plan in an amount that exceeded the minimum threshold requiring the item to be procured. Cause: The Authority was acquiring flooring throughout the year upon a unit becoming available to rehab it. Effect: Services were not obtained as required by Procurement requirements. However, due to the limited contractors available in the area, any cost impact would likely be negligible. Recommendation: Upon noting that a potential project will exceed the procurement limit, the contract must be bid out even if the costs will be spread out over a period of time. We recommend that future procurement transactions that are projected to exceed procurement thresholds be bid out in accordance with the Procurement Policy. Reply: We agree with the recommendation and will make sure that procurement actions are taken and documented in the future.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2020-004 Procurement The discussion Finding 2020-002 also applies to this finding.2020-002 Procurement Criteria - Procurement requirements have been approved in the Authority?s Procurement Policy. Condition: The Authority failed to obtain bids for flooring contracts for rehabbing of the units. A flooring item was included in the annual plan in an amount that exceeded the minimum threshold requiring the item to be procured. Cause: The Authority was acquiring flooring throughout the year upon a unit becoming available to rehab it. Effect: Services were not obtained as required by Procurement requirements. However, due to the limited contractors available in the area, any cost impact would likely be negligible. Recommendation: Upon noting that a potential project will exceed the procurement limit, the contract must be bid out even if the costs will be spread out over a period of time. We recommend that future procurement transactions that are projected to exceed procurement thresholds be bid out in accordance with the Procurement Policy. Reply: We agree with the recommendation and will make sure that procurement actions are taken and documented in the future.
2020-004 Procurement Response: Please refer to the response to finding 2020-002.2020-002 Procurement Response: We agree with the recommendation and will make sure that procurement actions are taken and documented in the future.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Missouri →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
