PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICTLocal Government

EIN: 716021158

UEI: GDYBLHGJ5JQ7

Audited by: Arkansas Legislative Audit

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT10 audit years4 findings1 repeat
10
Audit Years
4
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$15.2M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASISLOW-RISK AUDITEE$15,212,529 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 17, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 17, 2026 (19 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASISLOW-RISK AUDITEE$16,369,236 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2025 — management decision was due October 1, 2025.

2024-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

The District received federal reimbursement of $80,750 from the Emergency Connectivity Fund (ECF) for expenditures that were previously reimbursed by the American Rescue Plan - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ARP-ESSER). Cause: Lack of management oversight and adherence to program requirements. Effect or potential effect: $80,750 of duplicate support was received by the District. Questioned costs: $80,750. Context: Identified during the financial statement audit. The program was not audited as a major federal program. Identification as a repeat finding: No Recommendation: The District should contact the Federal Communications Commission for guidance regarding this matter. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding. Copies of the Verizon invoices for Hot Spots are given to the IT Department designee to collect and submit to the E-Rate Consultant. Prior to sending the invoices, the IT designee and CFO will meet to confirm the budgets units used and the submission. The Federal Communications Commission will be notified

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION EMERGENCY CONNECTIVITY FUND PROGRAM - AL NUMBER 32.009 AUDIT PERIOD - YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2025 2024-001. Activities allowed or unallowed Criteria or specific requirement: Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 47 CFR § 54.1712 states entities participating in the Emergency Connectivity Fund may not seek Emergency Connectivity Fund support or reimbursement for eligible equipment or services that have been purchased with or reimbursed in full from other Federal pandemic-relief funding, targeted state funding, other external sources of targeted funding or targeted gifts, or eligible for discounts from the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism or other universal service support mechanisms. Condition: The District received federal reimbursement of $80,750 from the Emergency Connectivity Fund (ECF) for expenditures that were previously reimbursed by the American Rescue Plan - Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ARP-ESSER). Cause: Lack of management oversight and adherence to program requirements. Effect or potential effect: $80,750 of duplicate support was received by the District. Questioned costs: $80,750. Context: Identified during the financial statement audit. The program was not audited as a major federal program. Identification as a repeat finding: No Recommendation: The District should contact the Federal Communications Commission for guidance regarding this matter. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with this finding. Copies of the Verizon invoices for Hot Spots are given to the IT Department designee to collect and submit to the E-Rate Consultant. Prior to sending the invoices, the IT designee and CFO will meet to confirm the budgets units used and the submission. The Federal Communications Commission will be notified

Corrective Action Plan

Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with this finding. Copies of the Verizon invoices for Hot Spots are given to the IT Department designee to collect and submit to the E-Rate Consultant. Prior to sending the invoices, the IT designee and CFO will meet to confirm the budgets units used and the submission. Scott Young is going to make contact with our E-Rate consultant, Sharon Dowdy, who will confirm the repayment of $80,750 of duplicate support by April 7, 2025. Persons responsible for corrective action: Scott Young, IT Project Manager; Jimmy Hogg, IT Director; Jackie Rowlett, District Treasurer. Anticipated corrective action implementation date: April 7, 2025.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →

FY 2023-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASISLOW-RISK AUDITEE$26,201,309 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2024 — management decision was due September 28, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASISLOW-RISK AUDITEE$37,355,259 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2023 — management decision was due September 30, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$18,807,180 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 24, 2022 — management decision was due November 24, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$11,345,932 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2021 — management decision was due September 28, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$13,360,847 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2020 — management decision was due September 29, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$15,022,982 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 24, 2019 — management decision was due September 24, 2019.

2018-003
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2017-003OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-003

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2017-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISLOW-RISK AUDITEE$18,247,679 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2018 — management decision was due September 27, 2018.

2017-002
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2017-003
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2016-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISLOW-RISK AUDITEE$16,040,607 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2017 — management decision was due September 27, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.