← Back to home

Pulaski County, ArkansasLocal Government

EIN: 716006487

UEI: Q5GWFEKZ6QR3

Audited by: EGP, PLLC.

Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

Pulaski County, Arkansas9 audit years2 findings
9
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$15.8M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-12-31

$15,847,130 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on September 18, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 18, 2026 (175 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →

FY 2023-12-31

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$17,286,501 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 3, 2024 — management decision was due March 3, 2025.

2023-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Criteria or specific requirement – Public Housing Authorities (PHAs) are required to have written policies in its administrative plan for selecting applicants from the waiting list and documentation must show that the PHA follows these policies when selecting applicants for admission from the waiting list. Condition and Context – Pulaski County HCVP administrative plan was incomplete when provided, with placeholders inserted for various policies. Additionally, it was noted that some individuals were added to the wait list during the audit year, despite the fact that the wait list had been closed in October of 2021. This was a result of prior employees colluding with other prior employees as well as housing assistance applicants. This included, but was not limited to, directing applicants not to date their application Effect – Individuals who were previously on the waiting list for Housing Choice Voucher assistance were skipped as a result of Pulaski County Housing not having and/ or following their own policies. Cause – Improper documentation of policies and procedures along with collusion between prior employees and/or housing applicants to expedite the move into the program. Questioned Costs – None noted. Recommendation – Pulaski County Housing should update its administrative plan and waiting list requirements to ensure that applicants are selected from the waiting list in the proper order. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – Management recognizes the deficiency and has worked with HUD officials, independent auditors, and legal counsel to examine the best course of action for the Housing Choice Vouchers program. Management has decided to relinquish all housing assistance programs, including the Housing Choice Vouchers Program, to another entity.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria or specific requirement – Public Housing Authorities (PHAs) are required to have written policies in its administrative plan for selecting applicants from the waiting list and documentation must show that the PHA follows these policies when selecting applicants for admission from the waiting list. Condition and Context – Pulaski County HCVP administrative plan was incomplete when provided, with placeholders inserted for various policies. Additionally, it was noted that some individuals were added to the wait list during the audit year, despite the fact that the wait list had been closed in October of 2021. This was a result of prior employees colluding with other prior employees as well as housing assistance applicants. This included, but was not limited to, directing applicants not to date their application Effect – Individuals who were previously on the waiting list for Housing Choice Voucher assistance were skipped as a result of Pulaski County Housing not having and/ or following their own policies. Cause – Improper documentation of policies and procedures along with collusion between prior employees and/or housing applicants to expedite the move into the program. Questioned Costs – None noted. Recommendation – Pulaski County Housing should update its administrative plan and waiting list requirements to ensure that applicants are selected from the waiting list in the proper order. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – Management recognizes the deficiency and has worked with HUD officials, independent auditors, and legal counsel to examine the best course of action for the Housing Choice Vouchers program. Management has decided to relinquish all housing assistance programs, including the Housing Choice Vouchers Program, to another entity.

Corrective Action Plan

Management recognizes the deficiency and has worked with HUD officials, independent auditors, and legal counsel to examine the best course of action for the Housing Choice Vouchers program. Management has decided to relinquish all housing assistance programs, including the Housing Choice Vouchers Program, to another entity.

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2023-002
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Condition and Context – Pulaski County HCVP administrative plan was incomplete when provided, with placeholders inserted for various policies. Although no tenant files tested resulted in the determination that the tenant was ineligible to receive assistance, various files were missing documentation that should have been present within the file. Additionally, criteria “d.” above was not met, as outlined in finding #2023-001. Effect – Without a complete administrative plan in place, tenant files are inconsistent in the documentation included that was used to verify eligibility for assistance and calculations of rent assistance to be paid. Cause – Improper documentation of policies and procedures along with collusion between prior employees and/ or housing applicants to expedite the move into the program. Questioned Costs – None noted. Recommendation – Pulaski County Housing should update its administrative plan and waiting list requirements to ensure that applicants are selected from the waiting list in the proper order. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – Management recognizes the deficiency and has worked with HUD officials, independent auditors, and legal counsel to examine the best course of action for the Housing Choice Vouchers program. Management has decided to

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition and Context – Pulaski County HCVP administrative plan was incomplete when provided, with placeholders inserted for various policies. Although no tenant files tested resulted in the determination that the tenant was ineligible to receive assistance, various files were missing documentation that should have been present within the file. Additionally, criteria “d.” above was not met, as outlined in finding #2023-001. Effect – Without a complete administrative plan in place, tenant files are inconsistent in the documentation included that was used to verify eligibility for assistance and calculations of rent assistance to be paid. Cause – Improper documentation of policies and procedures along with collusion between prior employees and/ or housing applicants to expedite the move into the program. Questioned Costs – None noted. Recommendation – Pulaski County Housing should update its administrative plan and waiting list requirements to ensure that applicants are selected from the waiting list in the proper order. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions – Management recognizes the deficiency and has worked with HUD officials, independent auditors, and legal counsel to examine the best course of action for the Housing Choice Vouchers program. Management has decided to

Corrective Action Plan

Management recognizes the deficiency and has worked with HUD officials, independent auditors, and legal counsel to examine the best course of action for the Housing Choice Vouchers program. Management has decided to relinquish all housing assistance programs, including the Housing Choice Vouchers Program, to another entity.

About Eligibility →

FY 2022-12-31

$40,015,299 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 24, 2023 — management decision was due March 24, 2024.

FY 2021-12-31

$39,516,085 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 24, 2023 — management decision was due July 24, 2023.

FY 2020-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,731,735 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 5, 2022 — management decision was due March 5, 2023.

FY 2019-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,091,983 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 2, 2021 — management decision was due August 2, 2021.

FY 2018-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,531,228 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2019 — management decision was due March 30, 2020.

FY 2017-12-31

$3,897,043 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 14, 2018 — management decision was due February 14, 2019.

FY 2016-12-31

$3,633,783 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 28, 2017 — management decision was due March 28, 2018.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Arkansas

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.