← Back to home

Northwest Regional Housing AuthorityLocal Government

EIN: 710548969

UEI: HJKRCEHAW6G4

Audited by: Smith Marion & Co

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

Northwest Regional Housing Authority10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$3.9M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,947,824 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,197,150 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 21, 2025 — management decision was due January 21, 2026.

FY 2023-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,672,469 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on July 16, 2024 — management decision was due January 16, 2025.

2023-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The PHA must inspect the unit leased to a family at least bi-annually to determine if the unit meets Housing Quality Standards (HQS) and the PHA must conduct quality control re‐inspections. The PHA must prepare a unit inspection report (24 CFR §§982.405, 983.103)). Additionally, for units under HAP contract that fail to meet HQS, the PHA must require the owner to correct any life threatening HQS deficiencies within 24 hours after the inspections and all other HQS deficiencies within 30 calendar days or within a specified PHA‐approved extension. If the owner does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must stop (abate) HAPs beginning no later than the first of the month following the specified correction period or must terminate the HAP contract. The owner is not responsible for a breach of HQS as a result of the family’s failure to pay for utilities for which the family is responsible under the lease or for tenant damage. For family‐caused defects, if the family does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must take prompt and vigorous action to enforce the family obligations (24 CFR sections 982.158(d) and 982.404). During our audit, we identified three (3) failed HQS that did not receive a pass for several months and no rent abetment process was started or enforced during that time period. The HQS population was 135 failed inspection. We selected a sample of 13 inspection and identified of those 13 reviewed 3 did not obtain a re-inspection pass within the Criteria noted above and no rent abetment process was enforce on landlord. The Authority staff did not want to jeopardize the tenants lease by enforcing the rent abatements and rather worked with the landlord over an extend period to resolve the failed inspection issues. The Authority is non‐compliant with the federal regulations over this federal program, this could potentially result in operating and financial penalties. We suggest the Authority properly oversee compliance with regulations and enforce rent abatements if necessary to adherence to federal compliance requirements. Management agrees with the finding, see Management's corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

The PHA must inspect the unit leased to a family at least bi-annually to determine if the unit meets Housing Quality Standards (HQS) and the PHA must conduct quality control re‐inspections. The PHA must prepare a unit inspection report (24 CFR §§982.405, 983.103)). Additionally, for units under HAP contract that fail to meet HQS, the PHA must require the owner to correct any life threatening HQS deficiencies within 24 hours after the inspections and all other HQS deficiencies within 30 calendar days or within a specified PHA‐approved extension. If the owner does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must stop (abate) HAPs beginning no later than the first of the month following the specified correction period or must terminate the HAP contract. The owner is not responsible for a breach of HQS as a result of the family’s failure to pay for utilities for which the family is responsible under the lease or for tenant damage. For family‐caused defects, if the family does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must take prompt and vigorous action to enforce the family obligations (24 CFR sections 982.158(d) and 982.404). During our audit, we identified three (3) failed HQS that did not receive a pass for several months and no rent abetment process was started or enforced during that time period. The HQS population was 135 failed inspection. We selected a sample of 13 inspection and identified of those 13 reviewed 3 did not obtain a re-inspection pass within the Criteria noted above and no rent abetment process was enforce on landlord. The Authority staff did not want to jeopardize the tenants lease by enforcing the rent abatements and rather worked with the landlord over an extend period to resolve the failed inspection issues. The Authority is non‐compliant with the federal regulations over this federal program, this could potentially result in operating and financial penalties. We suggest the Authority properly oversee compliance with regulations and enforce rent abatements if necessary to adherence to federal compliance requirements. Management agrees with the finding, see Management's corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Northwest Regional Housing Authority Abatement process will be enforced. There were several issues last year with inability to get materials and labor. Northwest Regional Housing Authority over road abatement when this was the issue. We will keep better records of abatements. Moving forward, we will follow the abatement requirements as required.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2022-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,255,913 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 17, 2023 — management decision was due January 17, 2024.

FY 2021-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,284,366 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 9, 2022 — management decision was due March 9, 2023.

FY 2020-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,434,535 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 28, 2021 — management decision was due March 28, 2022.

FY 2019-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,032,029 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 2, 2020 — management decision was due March 2, 2021.

FY 2018-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,171,037 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2019 — management decision was due March 29, 2020.

FY 2017-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,066,051 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 27, 2018 — management decision was due March 27, 2019.

FY 2016-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,928,600 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 16, 2017 — management decision was due February 16, 2018.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Arkansas

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.