EIN: 710413130
UEI: FTV6BJMJTHF1
Audited by: Abacus CPAs, LLC
Oversight agency: 66 [Environmental Protection Agency]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on February 20, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 20, 2026 (9 days ago).
What is a management decision? →Condition – For the year ended September 30, 2025, the District had a failure of controls over the investment section from a failure to recognize and record investment activity. The controls in place were not followed during the period. This condition resulted in incomplete activity and ending balances of investments. Criteria – Controls in place over investments include obtaining third party statements, recording and monitoring sales, trades, redemptions, purchases, and other investments routinely. Ongoing record is kept to verify accuracy of third party records and propose internal adjustments to investments. Effects – The failure to routinely monitor investment changes and activities resulted in the misrecognition of realized, unrealized, and cost basis of investments being misstated. Recommendation – Abacus has recommended a routine report to be updated along with periodic statements, with adjustments being posted in conjunction. Abacus also recommends an evaluation of current investment record keeping, and ease of use. Managements Response – Beaver Water District is committed to evaluating the current process of reconciling investments, including assessing the current investment record-keeping system, to ensure correct recording of investment changes.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition – For the year ended September 30, 2025, the District had a failure of controls over the investment section from a failure to recognize and record investment activity. The controls in place were not followed during the period. This condition resulted in incomplete activity and ending balances of investments. Criteria – Controls in place over investments include obtaining third party statements, recording and monitoring sales, trades, redemptions, purchases, and other investments routinely. Ongoing record is kept to verify accuracy of third party records and propose internal adjustments to investments. Effects – The failure to routinely monitor investment changes and activities resulted in the misrecognition of realized, unrealized, and cost basis of investments being misstated. Recommendation – Abacus has recommended a routine report to be updated along with periodic statements, with adjustments being posted in conjunction. Abacus also recommends an evaluation of current investment record keeping, and ease of use. Managements Response – Beaver Water District is committed to evaluating the current process of reconciling investments, including assessing the current investment record-keeping system, to ensure correct recording of investment changes.
The District assessed the investment record-keeping system and created a new spreadsheet to track investment changes more easily. The new investment spreadsheet will be updated on a periodic basis to ensure recording of investment changes.
Condition – During the year ended September 30, 2025, it was discovered depreciation methods for certain capital assets were applied inconsistently in current and prior years, resulting in the need to adjust depreciation expense and accumulated depreciation. Criteria – Controls in place over capital asset additions include obtaining purchase documentation, matching to accounting system, and using project codes and descriptions to input into capital asset software. Categories, methods, and lives are based on the inputs mentioned above. Effects – Clerical errors in descriptions, account or project grouping, and failure of review resulted in the capital asset group of land and land rights being depreciated incorrectly. Recommendation – Abacus has recommended a review of authoritative guidances on allowable depreciation methods, an evaluation of current capital asset control processes, and an additional evaluation of controls and abilities of capital asset management system. Managements Response – The misstatement of current year depreciation expense and accumulated depreciation amounts resulted from the misapplication of depreciation methods related to land and land rights. The affected assets represented a small portion of the total capital asset population and were primarily related to assets acquired in prior years. Current year depreciation expense was overstated by $57,000, representing 0.9% of the total depreciation expense of $6,557,584. The effect on accumulated depreciation for fiscal year 2025 was $330,000, representing 0.3% of $111,195,665 in accumulated depreciation. The 2025 financial statements have been adjusted to reflect the correct amounts. The District has committed to perform evaluations of the existing capital asset control processes and the abilities of the capital asset management system.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition – During the year ended September 30, 2025, it was discovered depreciation methods for certain capital assets were applied inconsistently in current and prior years, resulting in the need to adjust depreciation expense and accumulated depreciation. Criteria – Controls in place over capital asset additions include obtaining purchase documentation, matching to accounting system, and using project codes and descriptions to input into capital asset software. Categories, methods, and lives are based on the inputs mentioned above. Effects – Clerical errors in descriptions, account or project grouping, and failure of review resulted in the capital asset group of land and land rights being depreciated incorrectly. Recommendation – Abacus has recommended a review of authoritative guidances on allowable depreciation methods, an evaluation of current capital asset control processes, and an additional evaluation of controls and abilities of capital asset management system. Managements Response – The misstatement of current year depreciation expense and accumulated depreciation amounts resulted from the misapplication of depreciation methods related to land and land rights. The affected assets represented a small portion of the total capital asset population and were primarily related to assets acquired in prior years. Current year depreciation expense was overstated by $57,000, representing 0.9% of the total depreciation expense of $6,557,584. The effect on accumulated depreciation for fiscal year 2025 was $330,000, representing 0.3% of $111,195,665 in accumulated depreciation. The 2025 financial statements have been adjusted to reflect the correct amounts. The District has committed to perform evaluations of the existing capital asset control processes and the abilities of the capital asset management system.
The District will review the existing capital asset listing and make changes as necessary to ensure appropriate depreciation methods are applied to capital assets currently in-service. The default settings in the capital asset management software will be reviewed to ensure ease of use in applying the appropriate depreciation methods when placing new capital assets in-service. The District will review current control processes in place over capital asset additions to ensure application of the appropriate depreciation methods.
FAC accepted this audit on January 20, 2025 — management decision was due July 20, 2025.
Condition – For the year ended September 30, 2024, the District had a failure of controls over the expense section from fraudulent vendor communications. The controls in place were followed and confirmed with the real vendor, which had confirmed the invoice had needed to be paid. The impersonator has intercepted communications inside the entity and posed as a known vendor. Criteria – Controls in place over expensing include staff submitting purchase orders to accounting department, which compare and match invoice and vendor information to confirm. Additional communication with vendor and comparing ACH or payment information is reviewed if necessary. Effects – The fraudulent vendor communications led to an ACH payment. When legal counsel and insurance company was contacted no claim could be submitted due to limited coverage, and the funds could not be tracked. The full amount was expensed. Recommendation – Abacus has recommended an increase in insurance coverage, and an evaluation of current expense controls. Additional controls to address phishing and vendor impersonation fraud. An evaluation of the IT environment and security is also recommended. Managements Response – Beaver Water District has committed to increase coverage and evaluate current controls. An additional evaluation of the IT environment and security.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition – For the year ended September 30, 2024, the District had a failure of controls over the expense section from fraudulent vendor communications. The controls in place were followed and confirmed with the real vendor, which had confirmed the invoice had needed to be paid. The impersonator has intercepted communications inside the entity and posed as a known vendor. Criteria – Controls in place over expensing include staff submitting purchase orders to accounting department, which compare and match invoice and vendor information to confirm. Additional communication with vendor and comparing ACH or payment information is reviewed if necessary. Effects – The fraudulent vendor communications led to an ACH payment. When legal counsel and insurance company was contacted no claim could be submitted due to limited coverage, and the funds could not be tracked. The full amount was expensed. Recommendation – Abacus has recommended an increase in insurance coverage, and an evaluation of current expense controls. Additional controls to address phishing and vendor impersonation fraud. An evaluation of the IT environment and security is also recommended. Managements Response – Beaver Water District has committed to increase coverage and evaluate current controls. An additional evaluation of the IT environment and security.
A significant deficiency in internal control was noted in the Beaver Water District financial statement audit for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024. This deficiency was described in the Management Comment Letter (MCL) as follows: "A failure of expense controls to prevent a fraudulent vendor payment occurring during the year. The controls did allow for the detection and correction of the fraudulent vendor payment. The potential future effects are continued targeting of phishing and other scams and additional losses related to those fraudulent payments." In response to this significant deficiency the Beaver Water District has implemented the following Corrective Action Plan: Corrective actions that have been taken by Beaver Water District include- Positive Pay, an automated cash-management service used by the bank holding our operating accounts will continue to be utilized indefinitely. Regarding vendor payments made via ACH, the District's Accounting Office will positively confirm the remittance account information, including payee, routing number and bank account number. An Evolve Cyber Liability Insurance Policy has been purchased by the District to limit potential liability related to fraud. This policy became effective January 1, 2025, at an annual premium of $12,527.84 and a deductible of $10,000.00. A Fraud Training course named "Social Engineering Red Flags, KnowBe4 Security Awareness Training" was completed in 2023 and will be repeated in 2025. The number of hours completed by each employee totaled 7.25 hours and included awareness and prevention of phishing and other scams. This course or one similar will be repeated on an annual basis. The person responsible for implementing these corrective actions is Adam Motherwell, the District's Chief Financial Officer.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.