EIN: 710349983
UEI: JEGWP7BV5UA4
Audited by: Barrale Renshaw CPAs and Advisors LLC
Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 7, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 19, 2026 (81 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2024 — management decision was due June 19, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on December 6, 2023 — management decision was due June 6, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2023 — management decision was due September 26, 2023.
The Authority expended ineligible funds from the Capital fund Program that were not supported for the use and administration of the program. Criteria: In PIH Notice 2020-07, HUD noted that PHAs may encounter higher costs to administer Capital Fund grants because of the substantial challenges of having to do most of the work remotely. To provide accommodation for this possible constraint, HUD is waiving the Administration cost limitation established in 24 CFR 905.314(h) of 10 percent and temporarily resetting it to 15 percent. Context: During our analysis of Capital Funds, we noted that the Authority charged $76,054 in administrative salary costs to the Capital Fund Program during the current fiscal year. This, compared to the administrative salary amount charged to Operating Fund in the amount of $63,256, is $12,798 higher. This exceeded the prior fiscal year amount of $9,994 charged to administrative salaries in the Capital Fund Program by $66,060. The Authority was unable to provide support that these costs were associated with the administration and management of the Capital Fund Program. Based on the discussions and transactions recorded, this appeared to be a method of shifting Operating Fund costs to the Capital Fund Program. Effect: The Authority did not use the Capital Fund monies for eligible administrative expenses. Questioned Costs: The amount of questioned costs determined to be ineligible was $66,637. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Authority review the Capital Fund Program requirements to ensure all funds are spent on eligible activities. Administrative costs charged to the Capital Fund Program should be supported to verify that the costs are related to the management of the Capital Fund Program. Response: The email received from HUD regarding CARES and CFP was misinterpreted by the Housing Authority and after reviewing with the fee accountant, the fee accountant misinterpreted the information, thus provided inaccurate information on how to expend funds. The Housing Authority will review all disbursements monthly and consult with the fee accountant as to the purpose and nature of any costs that could be deemed as questionable or allowable under the Capital fund Program. In addition, the Housing Authority will ensure that all disbursements are adequately supported and can be easily traced to any LOCCS draw. We will also be requesting a budget revision.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Section III ? Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs 2022-003 Activities Allowed or Unallowed ?Capital Fund Program (Identical of 2022-002) Condition: The Authority expended ineligible funds from the Capital fund Program that were not supported for the use and administration of the program. Criteria: In PIH Notice 2020-07, HUD noted that PHAs may encounter higher costs to administer Capital Fund grants because of the substantial challenges of having to do most of the work remotely. To provide accommodation for this possible constraint, HUD is waiving the Administration cost limitation established in 24 CFR 905.314(h) of 10 percent and temporarily resetting it to 15 percent. Context: During our analysis of Capital Funds, we noted that the Authority charged $76,054 in administrative salary costs to the Capital Fund Program during the current fiscal year. This, compared to the administrative salary amount charged to Operating Fund in the amount of $63,256, is $12,798 higher. This exceeded the prior fiscal year amount of $9,994 charged to administrative salaries in the Capital Fund Program by $66,060. The Authority was unable to provide support that these costs were associated with the administration and management of the Capital Fund Program. Based on the discussions and transactions recorded, this appeared to be a method of shifting Operating Fund costs to the Capital Fund Program. Effect: The Authority did not use the Capital Fund monies for eligible administrative expenses. Questioned Costs: The amount of questioned costs determined to be ineligible was $66,637. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Authority review the Capital Fund Program requirements to ensure all funds are spent on eligible activities. Administrative costs charged to the Capital Fund Program should be supported to verify that the costs are related to the management of the Capital Fund Program. Response: The email received from HUD regarding CARES and CFP was misinterpreted by the Housing Authority and after reviewing with the fee accountant, the fee accountant misinterpreted the information, thus provided inaccurate information on how to expend funds. The Housing Authority will review all disbursements monthly and consult with the fee accountant as to the purpose and nature of any costs that could be deemed as questionable or allowable under the Capital fund Program. In addition, the Housing Authority will ensure that all disbursements are adequately supported and can be easily traced to any LOCCS draw. We will also be requesting a budget revision.
2022-001 - Internal Control over Financial Statements. Condition ? The financial statements and the Financial Data Schedule submitted to REAC had several material misstatements and were not prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Cause ? During the current fiscal year, the Housing Authority inexperienced staff was not aware of the year end documentation that was required to complete the financial statement preparation. In addition, the fee accountant was not specific in explaining the necessary items for Year End. Plan of Action ? The Housing Authority will conduct a monthly review of all financial data to ensure that all financial activities have been properly recorded. The Housing Authority will coordinate the Year End Process as outlined in the Year End checklist provided by Lindsey. In addition, in the future the financial statement preparation will be conducted on the Housing Authority?s server which enable the Housing Authority to retain records within the actual accounting system. Person Responsible: Ms. Donna Smith (Executive Director) Period of Action: The review will be conducted monthly and in coordination with MRI Software. 2022-002 Activities Allowed or Unallowed ? Capital Fund Program. Condition ? The Authority expended ineligible funds from the Capital fund Program that were not supported for the use of and administration of the program. Cause ? The Housing Authority misinterpreted the information regarding CARES and CFP sent from HUD and after reviewing with fee accountant, fee accountant misinterepreted the information provided, as well, thus providing inaccurate information on how to expense funds. Plan of Action ? The Housing Authority will review all disbursements monthly and consult with the fee accountant as to the purpose and nature of any costs that could be deemed as questionable or allowable under the Capital fund Program. In addition, the Housing Authority will ensure that all disbursements are adequately supported and can be easily traced to any LOCCS draw. We will also be requesting a budget revision. Person Responsible: Ms. Donna Smith (Executive Director)
FAC accepted this audit on October 10, 2022 — management decision was due April 10, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on October 15, 2020 — management decision was due April 15, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on May 27, 2020 — management decision was due November 27, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on March 20, 2019 — management decision was due September 20, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2018 — management decision was due September 26, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2017 — management decision was due September 27, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Missouri →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.