EIN: 710276839
UEI: ZWPZB3TYYDK4
Audited by: FORVIS LLP
Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 29, 2024 (699 days ago).
What is a management decision? →The Hospital’s portal reporting submission included errors. Questioned Costs: None Context: The Hospital chose to report under the alternative reporting methodology (option iii). Under this option, the Hospital submitted a memo describing its reasonable method of estimated revenues. The methodology described in the memo does not agree with the amounts the Hospital reported in the portal. The Hospital’s calculated lost revenue under its alternative reporting methodology was approximately $420,000 overstated for 2020 quarter 1 and approximately $537,000 understated for 2020 quarter 2, which led to actual total lost revenue being approximately $117,000 more than the amount the Hospital reported in the PRF portal. Effect: The report submitted in the PRF portal does not agree to the Hospital’s alternative reporting methodology, and quarterly lost revenues were improperly reported. Cause: The Hospital’s internal controls were not adequate to detect these reporting errors. Identification as a Repeat Finding: 2021-001. Recommendation: We recommend implementing controls to ensure amounts reported are accurate, complete and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs with the finding and recommendation; however, the errors did not result in materially different lost revenues claimed.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Reporting (45 CFR 75.342) and Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Cost Principles (Pub. L. No. 116-136, 134 Stat. 563 and Pub. L. No 115-139, 134 Stat. 622 and 623) Condition: The Hospital’s portal reporting submission included errors. Questioned Costs: None Context: The Hospital chose to report under the alternative reporting methodology (option iii). Under this option, the Hospital submitted a memo describing its reasonable method of estimated revenues. The methodology described in the memo does not agree with the amounts the Hospital reported in the portal. The Hospital’s calculated lost revenue under its alternative reporting methodology was approximately $420,000 overstated for 2020 quarter 1 and approximately $537,000 understated for 2020 quarter 2, which led to actual total lost revenue being approximately $117,000 more than the amount the Hospital reported in the PRF portal. Effect: The report submitted in the PRF portal does not agree to the Hospital’s alternative reporting methodology, and quarterly lost revenues were improperly reported. Cause: The Hospital’s internal controls were not adequate to detect these reporting errors. Identification as a Repeat Finding: 2021-001. Recommendation: We recommend implementing controls to ensure amounts reported are accurate, complete and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs with the finding and recommendation; however, the errors did not result in materially different lost revenues claimed.
Finding 2023-001 (UG) The Hospital chose to report under the alternative reporting methodology (option iii). Under this option, the Hospital submitted a memo describing its reasonable method of estimated revenues. The methodology described in the memo does not agree with the amounts the Hospital reported in the portal. The Hospital’s calculated lost revenue under its alternative reporting methodology was approximately $420,000 overstated for 2020 quarter 1 and approximately $537,000 understated for 2020 quarter 2, which led to actual total lost revenue being approximately $117,000 more than the amount the Hospital reported in the PRF portal. Recommendation We recommend implementing controls to ensure amounts reported are accurate, complete and reviewed. Comments on the Finding and Recommendation Management is in agreement with this finding and the related recommendation. Action(s) Taken or Planned on the Finding Management concurs with the finding and recommendation; however, lost revenues claimed would not have been materially different based on the finding.
2021-001
FAC accepted this audit on September 13, 2022 — management decision was due March 13, 2023.
The Hospital's portal reporting submission included errors. Questioned Costs: None Context: The Hospital chose to report under the alternative reporting methodology (option iii). Under this option, the Hospital submitted a memo describing its reasonable method of estimated revenues. The methodlogy described in the memo does not agree with the amounts the Hospital reported in the portal. The Hospital's calculated lost revenue under its alternative reporting methodology was approximately $420,000 overstated for 2020 quarter 1 and approxiamtely $537,000 understated for 2020 quarter 2, which led to actual total lost revenue being approximately $117,000 more than the amount the Hospital reported in the PRF portal. Effect: The report submitted in the PRF portal does not agree to the Hospital's alternative reporting methodology and quarterly lost revenues were improperly reported. Cause: The Hospital's internal controls were not adequate to detect these reporting errors. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend implementing controls to ensure amounts reported are accurate, complete and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs with the finding and recommendation; however, the errors did not result in materially different lost revenues claimed.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Reporting (45 CFR 75.342) and Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Cost Principles (Pub. L. No. 116-136, 134 Stat. 563 and Pub. L. No 115-139, 134 Stat. 622 and 623) Condition: The Hospital's portal reporting submission included errors. Questioned Costs: None Context: The Hospital chose to report under the alternative reporting methodology (option iii). Under this option, the Hospital submitted a memo describing its reasonable method of estimated revenues. The methodlogy described in the memo does not agree with the amounts the Hospital reported in the portal. The Hospital's calculated lost revenue under its alternative reporting methodology was approximately $420,000 overstated for 2020 quarter 1 and approxiamtely $537,000 understated for 2020 quarter 2, which led to actual total lost revenue being approximately $117,000 more than the amount the Hospital reported in the PRF portal. Effect: The report submitted in the PRF portal does not agree to the Hospital's alternative reporting methodology and quarterly lost revenues were improperly reported. Cause: The Hospital's internal controls were not adequate to detect these reporting errors. Identification as a Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend implementing controls to ensure amounts reported are accurate, complete and reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs with the finding and recommendation; however, the errors did not result in materially different lost revenues claimed.
Finding 2021-001 (UG) The Hospital chose to report lost revenues within the HRSA Provider Relief Fund phase 1 portal submission under the alternative reporting methodology (option iii). Under the option, the Organization submitted a memo describing its reasonable method of estimated revenues. The methodology described does not agree with the amounts the Hospital reported in the portal. The Hospital?s calculated lost revenue under its alternative reporting methodology was approximately $117,000 more than the amount the Hospital reported in the PRF portal. Recommendation We recommend implementing controls to ensure amounts reported are accruate, complete and reviewed. Comments on the Finding and Recommendation Management is in agreement with this finding and the related recommendation. Action(s) Taken or Planned on the Finding Management concurs with the finding and recommendation; however, lost revenues claimed would not have been materially different based on the finding.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
