← Back to home

North Arkansas Electric Cooperative, Inc.Non-Profit

EIN: 710131073

UEI: EPL2U1MM1U78

Audited by: Forvis Mazars, LLP

Oversight agency: 97 [Department of Homeland Security]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

North Arkansas Electric Cooperative, Inc.1 audit years1 findings
1
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$2.7M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-12-31

$2,701,095 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on April 28, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 28, 2026 (55 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

Federal Program: U.S. Department of Homeland Security – FEMA Assistance Listing Number: 97.036 - Disaster Grants - Public Assistance Passthrough Entity - Arkansas Department of Emergency Management Program Year: 2025 Criteria - Under 2 CFR 200.403 and 2 CFR 200.404, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, and adequately documented. In addition, FEMA Public Assistance guidance requires that force account labor costs be based on actual hours worked and actual compensation paid, and that such costs not be duplicated or otherwise unallowable. Condition – An employee payroll payment was reported twice as an eligible expenditure, resulting in a duplicate payment being charged to the grant. Cause - The duplicate payment resulted from human error, as accounting personnel inadvertently entered the same payment into the grant reporting system twice. Although controls exist, they were not sufficient in this instance to detect or prevent the duplicate reporting. Effect or potential effect - As a result of the duplicate request, unallowable payroll costs were charged to the FEMA grant. If not identified and corrected, such errors could lead to FEMA reimbursement of costs that do not represent actual, allowable labor expenditures and could result in repayment demands or reduced future reimbursement. Questioned Costs – Known error: $5,072; Total estimated error $57,703 Context - We selected a sample of 29 out of a population of 187 employee payroll expenditures charged to the grant. We noted 1 employee payroll expenditure was duplicated resulting in an error of $5,072. The sample value was $45,597 out of a population value of $518,914. The sampling methodology used is not, and is not intended to be, statistically valid. Recommendation - We recommend management strengthen payroll review and reconciliation procedures to ensure that payroll payments charged to federal grants are reviewed for accuracy and completeness prior to submission for reimbursement. Additional supervisory review or system based duplicate payment controls should be implemented to reduce the risk of similar errors in the future. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management concurs with this finding. The duplicate request for reimbursement of a single payroll payment was an isolated clerical oversight. This specific error was not caught during the final review process prior to submission. Management recognizes the importance of accurate reporting and has already taken steps to ensure all future reimbursement requests are reconciled against previous submissions to prevent recurrence.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program: U.S. Department of Homeland Security – FEMA Assistance Listing Number: 97.036 - Disaster Grants - Public Assistance Passthrough Entity - Arkansas Department of Emergency Management Program Year: 2025 Criteria - Under 2 CFR 200.403 and 2 CFR 200.404, costs charged to federal awards must be necessary, reasonable, and adequately documented. In addition, FEMA Public Assistance guidance requires that force account labor costs be based on actual hours worked and actual compensation paid, and that such costs not be duplicated or otherwise unallowable. Condition – An employee payroll payment was reported twice as an eligible expenditure, resulting in a duplicate payment being charged to the grant. Cause - The duplicate payment resulted from human error, as accounting personnel inadvertently entered the same payment into the grant reporting system twice. Although controls exist, they were not sufficient in this instance to detect or prevent the duplicate reporting. Effect or potential effect - As a result of the duplicate request, unallowable payroll costs were charged to the FEMA grant. If not identified and corrected, such errors could lead to FEMA reimbursement of costs that do not represent actual, allowable labor expenditures and could result in repayment demands or reduced future reimbursement. Questioned Costs – Known error: $5,072; Total estimated error $57,703 Context - We selected a sample of 29 out of a population of 187 employee payroll expenditures charged to the grant. We noted 1 employee payroll expenditure was duplicated resulting in an error of $5,072. The sample value was $45,597 out of a population value of $518,914. The sampling methodology used is not, and is not intended to be, statistically valid. Recommendation - We recommend management strengthen payroll review and reconciliation procedures to ensure that payroll payments charged to federal grants are reviewed for accuracy and completeness prior to submission for reimbursement. Additional supervisory review or system based duplicate payment controls should be implemented to reduce the risk of similar errors in the future. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management concurs with this finding. The duplicate request for reimbursement of a single payroll payment was an isolated clerical oversight. This specific error was not caught during the final review process prior to submission. Management recognizes the importance of accurate reporting and has already taken steps to ensure all future reimbursement requests are reconciled against previous submissions to prevent recurrence.

Corrective Action Plan

Federal Program: U.S. Department of Homeland Security - FEMA Assistance Listing Number: 97.036 - Disaster Grants - Public Assistance Passthrough Entity - Arkansas Department of Emergency Management Program Year: 2025 Management concurs with the finding. Corrective Action Planned: 1. Process Improvement: Management has updated its internal grant reimbursement request process. All future reimbursement requests now require a "Duplicate Payment Verification" step, where the preparer must reconcile the current request against the cumulative total of previous requests to ensure no individual transaction is billed twice. 2. Enhanced Oversight: A secondary review by Julie Haney will now explicitly include a cross-reference of payroll periods to the general ledger to confirm the uniqueness of each request. Anticipated Completion Date: The repayment will be initiated by 05/01/2026, and the updated reconciliation procedures have been implemented as of 03/31/2026. Responsible Official: Julie Haney CFO

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Arkansas

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.