← Back to home

PARTNERS WITH FAMILIES & CHILDREN: SPOKANENon-Profit

EIN: 680576560

UEI: GSA_MIGRATION

Audited by: CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLP

Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

PARTNERS WITH FAMILIES & CHILDREN: SPOKANE2 audit years2 findings
2
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$826.2K
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2020)

FY 2020-12-31

$826,180 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on September 14, 2022. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 14, 2023 (1269 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2020-003
Reporting
OTHER MATTERS

The Data Collection Form was not filed timely. Questioned costs: No known questioned costs were identified during the course of the audit. Context: The Data Collection Form is required to be submitted at the earlier of 9 months after year-end or 30 days after the completion of the audit. Cause: The Organization was waiting on Washington State Department of Commerce for a decision on an allowable cost. Effect: The Organization was out of compliance with grant contract. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization file the Data Collection Form timely.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria or specific requirement: The Data Collection Form is required to be submitted at the earlier of 9 months after year-end or 30 days after the completion of the audit. Condition: The Data Collection Form was not filed timely. Questioned costs: No known questioned costs were identified during the course of the audit. Context: The Data Collection Form is required to be submitted at the earlier of 9 months after year-end or 30 days after the completion of the audit. Cause: The Organization was waiting on Washington State Department of Commerce for a decision on an allowable cost. Effect: The Organization was out of compliance with grant contract. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization file the Data Collection Form timely.

Corrective Action Plan

Action taken in response to finding: We will file the Data Collection Form as soon as it is available. Partners was unable to file the Data Collection Form in a timely manner since the audit was not yet complete. There was a question about an allowable cost that Partners began a conversation with Washington State Department of Commerce on January 10, 2022. This was finally resolved and a memo from the Department of Commerce was sent to the auditor on June 23, 2022. The preliminary draft of the audit of the major federal program was sent to Partners on August 1, 2022 and the final draft on September 1, 2022. Therefore, Partners was unable to complete this form within the proper timeframe. It will be filed within 30 days of the auditors? final report.

About Reporting →

FY 2019-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$874,955 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on October 19, 2020 — management decision was due April 19, 2021.

2019-003
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Condtion: During the current year, the Organization allocated salaries of administrative and clerical staff as direct charges to a Federal grant received. The Organization failed to support the allocation of the employee salaries or wages among specific activities or cost objectives identified with a project or activity. Criteria: Based on the standards of documentation of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), the requirements related to direct charging of administrative and clerical staff salaries to a grant is appropriate if the administrative or clerical services are integral to a project or activity, individuals involved can be specifically identified with the project or activity, costs are explicitly included in the budget or have the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency; and the costs are not also recovered as indirect costs. Effect: The Organization was out of compliance with the standards of documentation under the Uniform Guidance required for directly allocating salaries of administrative and clerical staff to the grant. Cause: The lack of documentation supporting the direct allocation of salaries of administrative and clerical staff associated with the Uniform Guidance Compliance Supplement requirements. Questioned Costs: No known questioned costs were identified during the course of the audit. Recommendations: We recommend that the Organization implement a procedure that allows them to document their allocation of administrative and clerical staff salaries as direct charges to Federal grants in accordance with the Uniform Guidance Compliance Supplement requirements. Management's Response: While the direct charges for administrative and clerical staff were appropriate, allowed, and accepted, Partners acknowledges the need to develop supporting documentation for their direct allocation. Management will work with an accounting consultant or firm to develop procedures that allow accounting personnel to properly allocate administrative and clerical staff salaries to Federal grants in accordance with the Uniform Guidance Compliance Supplement requirements.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condtion: During the current year, the Organization allocated salaries of administrative and clerical staff as direct charges to a Federal grant received. The Organization failed to support the allocation of the employee salaries or wages among specific activities or cost objectives identified with a project or activity. Criteria: Based on the standards of documentation of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), the requirements related to direct charging of administrative and clerical staff salaries to a grant is appropriate if the administrative or clerical services are integral to a project or activity, individuals involved can be specifically identified with the project or activity, costs are explicitly included in the budget or have the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency; and the costs are not also recovered as indirect costs. Effect: The Organization was out of compliance with the standards of documentation under the Uniform Guidance required for directly allocating salaries of administrative and clerical staff to the grant. Cause: The lack of documentation supporting the direct allocation of salaries of administrative and clerical staff associated with the Uniform Guidance Compliance Supplement requirements. Questioned Costs: No known questioned costs were identified during the course of the audit. Recommendations: We recommend that the Organization implement a procedure that allows them to document their allocation of administrative and clerical staff salaries as direct charges to Federal grants in accordance with the Uniform Guidance Compliance Supplement requirements. Management's Response: While the direct charges for administrative and clerical staff were appropriate, allowed, and accepted, Partners acknowledges the need to develop supporting documentation for their direct allocation. Management will work with an accounting consultant or firm to develop procedures that allow accounting personnel to properly allocate administrative and clerical staff salaries to Federal grants in accordance with the Uniform Guidance Compliance Supplement requirements.

Corrective Action Plan

While the direct charges for administrative and clerical staff were appropriate, allowed, and accepted, Partners acknowledges the need to develop sufficient supporting documentation for their direct allocation. Management will work with an accounting consultant or firm to develop procedures that allow accounting personnel to properly allocate administrative and clerical staff salaries to Federal grants in accordance with the Uniform Guidance Compliance Supplement requirements. The consultant will review and evaluate current documentation and methodology and give recommendations by 12/31/20. Partners will develop a plan by 1/31/21 and have the plan implemented by 2/28/21.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Washington

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.