EIN: 680162903
UEI: RMKZJPGUFM92
Audited by: Baker Tilly US, LLP
Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 7, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on July 8, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by January 8, 2027 (116 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2025 — management decision was due March 30, 2026.
FAC accepted this audit on July 30, 2024 — management decision was due January 30, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on June 20, 2023 — management decision was due December 20, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on July 18, 2022 — management decision was due January 18, 2023.
COVID-19 Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution Assistance Listing Number 93.498 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Criteria or Specific Requirement ? Reporting (45 CFR 75.342), Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles (Pub. L. No. 116-136, 134 Stat. 563 and Pub. L. No. 116-139, 134 Stat. 622 and 623) Condition ? The Organization is required to prepare and submit period one provider relief fund (PRF) reporting. This report is to be prepared using accurate financial information and submitted by the deadline established. PRF amounts to be reported on the SEFA are based on the report. Questioned costs ? $224,519. Amount reported on the SEFA does not agree to the Period 1 PRF report. Context ? The Organization obligated the period one provider relief funds received utilizing expenditures incurred to maintain health care service delivery. However, in the period one report, these expenditures were incorrectly reported in the Unreimbursed Expenses Attributable to Coronavirus reporting section instead of the Other PRF Expense section. As a result, the report reflected the full balance of PRF funds received as unused. Effect ? Errors were made in reporting expenditures. Cause ? The Organization did not properly follow the reporting guidance. Identification as a repeat finding ? Not a repeat finding. Recommendation ? Policies and procedures over federal grant reporting should be modified to ensure reports are prepared and report complete and accurate information. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions ? While it was identified the expenses were incorrectly reported in the Unreimbursed Expenses Attributable to Coronavirus reporting section instead of the Other PRF Expense section, OCH management was following verbal instruction given by HRSA staff via telephone. However, this verbal instruction was not documented. Therefore, upon discovery of the finding, another follow up phone call was completed with HRSA. OCH was instructed by HRSA that no amendment could be made and that OCH would need to wait until contacted by HRSA to make corrections. OCH agrees to the finding and will ensure that reports are prepared with complete and accurate information based on policies and procedures for federal grant reporting. OCH further notes that while the amount was incorrectly reported in unreimbursed expenses, the PRF funds received was in fact fully expended within the reporting period.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴COVID-19 Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution Assistance Listing Number 93.498 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Criteria or Specific Requirement ? Reporting (45 CFR 75.342), Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs/Cost Principles (Pub. L. No. 116-136, 134 Stat. 563 and Pub. L. No. 116-139, 134 Stat. 622 and 623) Condition ? The Organization is required to prepare and submit period one provider relief fund (PRF) reporting. This report is to be prepared using accurate financial information and submitted by the deadline established. PRF amounts to be reported on the SEFA are based on the report. Questioned costs ? $224,519. Amount reported on the SEFA does not agree to the Period 1 PRF report. Context ? The Organization obligated the period one provider relief funds received utilizing expenditures incurred to maintain health care service delivery. However, in the period one report, these expenditures were incorrectly reported in the Unreimbursed Expenses Attributable to Coronavirus reporting section instead of the Other PRF Expense section. As a result, the report reflected the full balance of PRF funds received as unused. Effect ? Errors were made in reporting expenditures. Cause ? The Organization did not properly follow the reporting guidance. Identification as a repeat finding ? Not a repeat finding. Recommendation ? Policies and procedures over federal grant reporting should be modified to ensure reports are prepared and report complete and accurate information. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions ? While it was identified the expenses were incorrectly reported in the Unreimbursed Expenses Attributable to Coronavirus reporting section instead of the Other PRF Expense section, OCH management was following verbal instruction given by HRSA staff via telephone. However, this verbal instruction was not documented. Therefore, upon discovery of the finding, another follow up phone call was completed with HRSA. OCH was instructed by HRSA that no amendment could be made and that OCH would need to wait until contacted by HRSA to make corrections. OCH agrees to the finding and will ensure that reports are prepared with complete and accurate information based on policies and procedures for federal grant reporting. OCH further notes that while the amount was incorrectly reported in unreimbursed expenses, the PRF funds received was in fact fully expended within the reporting period.
Cares Community Health dba One Community Health Response to Audit Finding for Year Ended December 31, 2021 While it was identified that expenses were incorrectly reported in the Unreimbursed Expenses Attributable to Coronavirus reporting section instead of the Other PRF Expense section, OCH management was following verbal instruction given by HRSA staff via telephone. However, this verbal instruction was not documented. Therefore, upon discovery of the finding, another follow up phone call was completed with HRSA. OCH was instructed by HRSA that no amendment could be made and that OCH would need to wait until contacted by HRSA to make any correction. OCH agrees to the finding and will ensure that reports are prepared with complete and accurate information based on policies and procedures for federal grant reporting. OCH further notes that while the amount was incorrectly reported in unreimbursed expenses, the PRF funds received was in fact fully expended within the reporting period. Anticipated Completion Date: June 2022 Responsible Contact Person: Sashi Jit, Controller
FAC accepted this audit on November 14, 2021 — management decision was due May 14, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on October 12, 2020 — management decision was due April 12, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on July 29, 2019 — management decision was due January 29, 2020.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2017-001
FAC accepted this audit on August 11, 2018 — management decision was due February 11, 2019.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FAC accepted this audit on June 29, 2017 — management decision was due December 29, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in California →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
