EIN: 680123611
UEI: WL13J9GQ2D16
Audited by: Baker Tilly US, LLP
Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on January 13, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 13, 2026 (52 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2024 — management decision was due June 19, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on February 2, 2024 — management decision was due August 2, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on December 21, 2022 — management decision was due June 21, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on December 23, 2021 — management decision was due June 23, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on January 13, 2021 — management decision was due July 13, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on January 7, 2020 — management decision was due July 7, 2020.
Finding 2019-001 - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles (Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance) Criteria - In accordance with Part 200 of the Uniform Guidance, ?200.405a Allocable costs, a cost is only allocable to a particular Federal award if the services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. Condition- Expenditures were allocated to the major federal program that were expenditures of a separate grant award. Questioned Costs - $352 of known questioned costs. Context - Two instances were noted of respite services, totaling $352, being improperly allocated and reimbursed by the major program when the participant's expenditures were approved and being allocated to a State grant. Effect - Expenditures not allocable to the major program were reimbursed to the Organization. Cause - The control in place to review the allocation of expenditures to grant awards failed in execution. Recommendation - We recommend management perform a more thorough review of expenditure allocations, including a second review of funding source, prior to claiming the reimbursement to the grant. Management's Response - In November 2018, one client had two vouchers for respite care totaling $352. Although the correct funding source was on the voucher paperwork, it was coded incorrectly when entered into QuickBooks for payment. We are in agreement with the recommendation to perform a more thorough review of expenditure allocations, including a second review of funding source, prior to claiming the reimbursement to the grant and have updated our financial procedures to reflect this practice.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2019-001 - Allowable Costs/Cost Principles (Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance) Criteria - In accordance with Part 200 of the Uniform Guidance, ?200.405a Allocable costs, a cost is only allocable to a particular Federal award if the services involved are chargeable or assignable to that Federal award or cost objective in accordance with relative benefits received. Condition- Expenditures were allocated to the major federal program that were expenditures of a separate grant award. Questioned Costs - $352 of known questioned costs. Context - Two instances were noted of respite services, totaling $352, being improperly allocated and reimbursed by the major program when the participant's expenditures were approved and being allocated to a State grant. Effect - Expenditures not allocable to the major program were reimbursed to the Organization. Cause - The control in place to review the allocation of expenditures to grant awards failed in execution. Recommendation - We recommend management perform a more thorough review of expenditure allocations, including a second review of funding source, prior to claiming the reimbursement to the grant. Management's Response - In November 2018, one client had two vouchers for respite care totaling $352. Although the correct funding source was on the voucher paperwork, it was coded incorrectly when entered into QuickBooks for payment. We are in agreement with the recommendation to perform a more thorough review of expenditure allocations, including a second review of funding source, prior to claiming the reimbursement to the grant and have updated our financial procedures to reflect this practice.
To Whom It May Concern, As required by the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), we have provided below our response and corrective action plan addressing the findings in the Report of Independent Auditors on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards and the Report of Independent Auditors on Compliance for the Major Federal Program and Report on Internal Control Over Compliance Required by the Uniform Guidance for the year ended June 30, 2019. Response and Corrective Action Plan Finding No. 2019-001 Allowable Costs/Cost Principles (Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance) Cause: The control in place to review the allocation of expenditures to grant awards failed in execution. Management Response: In November 2018, one client had two vouchers for respite care totaling $352. Although the correct funding source was on the voucher paperwork, it was coded incorrectly when entered into QuickBooks for payment. We are in agreement with the recommendation to perform a more thorough review of expenditure allocations, including a second review of funding source, prior to claiming the reimbursement to the grant and have updated our financial procedures to reflect this practice. Sincerely, Michelle Nevins Executive Director Del Oro Caregiver Resource Center
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in California →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.