← Back to home

EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATES, INC.Non-Profit

EIN: 660363441

UEI: N9P5BL6FRP14

Audited by: CPA DIAZ-MARTINEZ, CSP

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATES, INC.10 audit years2 findings
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.4M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,350,470 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on February 27, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 27, 2026 (3 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2025-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

FEDERAL PROGRAM (ALN – 97.036) DISASTER GRANTS – PUBLIC ASSISTANCE (PRESIDENTIALLY DECLARED DISASTERS) PASS-THROUGH: PUERTO RICO CENTRAL OFFICE OF RECOVERY, RECONSTRUCTION, AND RESILIENCY (COR3) FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) AWARD NUMBERS PA-02-PR-4339-PW-09011(9604) (FISCAL YEAR 2021) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT SPECIAL TESTS AND PROVISIONS – PROJECT ACCOUNTING TYPE OF FINDING NONCOMPLIANCE AND SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY CRITERIA The 44 CFR Section 206.205 “Payment of Claims” state for large projects, the recipient is required to make an accounting to FEMA of eligible costs. Similarly, the subrecipient must make an accounting to the recipient. In submitting the accounting, the entity is required to certify that reported costs were incurred in performance of eligible work, that the approved work was completed, that the project is in compliance with the provisions of the FEMA-State Agreement, all grant conditions were met, and that payments for that project were made in accordance with the applicable payment provisions. The Puerto Rico Central Office of Recovery, Reconstruction, and Resiliency (COR3), as a Pass-Through Entity, requires Subrecipients to complete and submit a Quarterly Progress Report for each Project Worksheet (“PW”) through the Disaster Recovery Solution (“DRS”) Platform. This information is then submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for ongoing and completed projects that are accounted for in accordance with the required certification. In addition, 2 CFR §200.303 (a) establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient or subrecipient is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should align with the guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). STATEMENT OF CONDITION For purposes of the Special Test and Provision – Project Accounting testing for this program, the Institution maintains only one (1) large project identified under PW 9011. For this project, a population of four (4) quarterly reports was established, of which two (2) were selected for testing purposes for the fiscal year 2024–2025 audit. As a review of the 3rd Quarterly Progress Report for the period from April through June 2025, it was noted that the Institution reported $30,243.64 in expenditures for the period. However, upon comparison with the expenditures recorded in the Institution’s financial system, it was determined that the actual expenditures for the quarter totaled $98,481.96, resulting in a difference of $68,238.32 between the reported amount and the system records. In addition, for the requirement mentioned above, based on internal control interviews, we found that there is no designated individual responsible for independently reviewing the reports prior to submission to ensure accuracy and consistency with source data. QUESTIONED COSTS NonePERSPECTIVE INFORMATION After we received the Quarterly Progress Report, we proceeded to make a comparison between this report and the Expenditures Report issued by the Institution accounting system for each of the quarters selected, in order to validate the data accuracy. We noted that the Institution did not detect this discrepancy in the report before the submission of the required Quarterly Progress Report for the project to the pass-through entity due to the lack of adequate revision procedure. STATEMENT OF CAUSE The Institution did not have an effective internal control to ensure that the required financial information to be included as part of the preparation and submission of the Quarterly Progress Report is accurate according to their accounting system. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT The Institution did not have an effective internal control to ensure that the required financial information to be included as part of the preparation and submission of the Quarterly Progress Report is accurate according to their accounting system. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not previously reported. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Institution maintain an adequate Quarterly Progress Report validation control before its submission to Federal Agency. This will avoid the incorrect inclusion of erroneous data in this Federal report to the Pass-Through Entity.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FEDERAL PROGRAM (ALN – 97.036) DISASTER GRANTS – PUBLIC ASSISTANCE (PRESIDENTIALLY DECLARED DISASTERS) PASS-THROUGH: PUERTO RICO CENTRAL OFFICE OF RECOVERY, RECONSTRUCTION, AND RESILIENCY (COR3) FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) AWARD NUMBERS PA-02-PR-4339-PW-09011(9604) (FISCAL YEAR 2021) COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT SPECIAL TESTS AND PROVISIONS – PROJECT ACCOUNTING TYPE OF FINDING NONCOMPLIANCE AND SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY CRITERIA The 44 CFR Section 206.205 “Payment of Claims” state for large projects, the recipient is required to make an accounting to FEMA of eligible costs. Similarly, the subrecipient must make an accounting to the recipient. In submitting the accounting, the entity is required to certify that reported costs were incurred in performance of eligible work, that the approved work was completed, that the project is in compliance with the provisions of the FEMA-State Agreement, all grant conditions were met, and that payments for that project were made in accordance with the applicable payment provisions. The Puerto Rico Central Office of Recovery, Reconstruction, and Resiliency (COR3), as a Pass-Through Entity, requires Subrecipients to complete and submit a Quarterly Progress Report for each Project Worksheet (“PW”) through the Disaster Recovery Solution (“DRS”) Platform. This information is then submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for ongoing and completed projects that are accounted for in accordance with the required certification. In addition, 2 CFR §200.303 (a) establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the recipient or subrecipient is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should align with the guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). STATEMENT OF CONDITION For purposes of the Special Test and Provision – Project Accounting testing for this program, the Institution maintains only one (1) large project identified under PW 9011. For this project, a population of four (4) quarterly reports was established, of which two (2) were selected for testing purposes for the fiscal year 2024–2025 audit. As a review of the 3rd Quarterly Progress Report for the period from April through June 2025, it was noted that the Institution reported $30,243.64 in expenditures for the period. However, upon comparison with the expenditures recorded in the Institution’s financial system, it was determined that the actual expenditures for the quarter totaled $98,481.96, resulting in a difference of $68,238.32 between the reported amount and the system records. In addition, for the requirement mentioned above, based on internal control interviews, we found that there is no designated individual responsible for independently reviewing the reports prior to submission to ensure accuracy and consistency with source data. QUESTIONED COSTS NonePERSPECTIVE INFORMATION After we received the Quarterly Progress Report, we proceeded to make a comparison between this report and the Expenditures Report issued by the Institution accounting system for each of the quarters selected, in order to validate the data accuracy. We noted that the Institution did not detect this discrepancy in the report before the submission of the required Quarterly Progress Report for the project to the pass-through entity due to the lack of adequate revision procedure. STATEMENT OF CAUSE The Institution did not have an effective internal control to ensure that the required financial information to be included as part of the preparation and submission of the Quarterly Progress Report is accurate according to their accounting system. POSSIBLE ASSERTED EFFECT The Institution did not have an effective internal control to ensure that the required financial information to be included as part of the preparation and submission of the Quarterly Progress Report is accurate according to their accounting system. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING Not previously reported. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the Institution maintain an adequate Quarterly Progress Report validation control before its submission to Federal Agency. This will avoid the incorrect inclusion of erroneous data in this Federal report to the Pass-Through Entity.

Corrective Action Plan

The Institution implements a formal validation and review process for all Quarterly Progress Reports. As part of this corrective action: • Copies of all checks and/or disbursements included in the report will be attached to each Quarterly Progress Report. • All reported expenditures will be verified against the Institution’s accounting system. • Each Quarterly Progress Report will be reviewed, verified, and certified by the President of the Institution or the Compliance Officer prior to submission to COR3/FEMA. Implementation Plan: • Develop and formalize a written procedure for the preparation, validation, and review of Quarterly Progress Reports. • Designate a responsible official to perform an independent review of the report. • Require supporting documentation, including copies of checks and accounting system reports, as mandatory attachments. • Obtain written certification and signature from the President or Compliance Officer prior to submission. IMPLEMENTATION DATE Immediately RESPONSIBLE PERSON Compliance Officer President of the Institution

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,445,211 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 14, 2025 — management decision was due July 14, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,578,535 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 15, 2024 — management decision was due July 15, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,853,515 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 12, 2023 — management decision was due July 12, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,287,436 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2022 — management decision was due September 30, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,014,250 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 29, 2021 — management decision was due December 29, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,278,954 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 28, 2020 — management decision was due July 28, 2020.

2019-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2019-001 FEDERAL PROGRAM FEDERAL WORK-STUDY PROGRAM (FWS) (CFDA 84.033) U.S. DEPARTEMENT OF EDUCATION AWARD NUMBER OPE ID: 02340600, FWS ID: 006429 COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT SPECIAL TEST AND PROVISION ? DISBURSEMENT TO OR ON BEHALF OF STUDENT TYPE OF FINDING SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY AND NONCOMPLIANCE CRITERIA OR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT As established in 34 CFR ? 675.16 Payments to Students, states that; (a)(4) regardless of who employs the student, the Institution is responsible for ensuring that the student is paid for work performed, (a)(5) a student?s FWS compensation is earned when the student performs the work and (a)(9) an Institution makes a disbursement of FWS program funds on the date that the Institution credit?s a student?s account at the Institution or pays a student directly with funds received from the secretary; or institutional funds used in advance of receiving FWS program funds. CONDITION During our test performed over the FWS disbursements on behalf of student sample, we reviewed the accuracy of the student time sheet, and we found that the Institution paid four (4) hours less to a student for compensation earned per work performed. According to the Student?s Time Sheet, the student should receive an FWS compensation of 23.5 hours worked during the month of January 2019. After this time sheet was approved by a supervisor, the payment for this student was issued for 19.5 hours instead of 23.5 hours as indicated in the time sheet signed by the student. EFFECT The Institution did not pay the full amount of the student?s FWS compensation earned and have the right to receive per the federal program regulations. The student did not receive the full amount of FWS compensation to which he was entitled according to the approved FWS funds. QUESTIONED COSTS Not determined CONTEXT The Institution approved a payment for a different total of hours than the stated in the student?s time sheet reviewed and signed by the supervising personnel. CAUSE The Institution did not adequately review the student?s time sheet for the accuracy payment issuance purpose. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING N/A RECOMMENDATION The Institution should improve their internal control procedures to monitor the total hours of work performed by the students in order to pay the correct amount of FWS compensation to the student in accordance with the time sheet. In addition, the Institution should implement an internal control procedure that requires that the Student Financial Assistance Director verify the time sheet mathematical accuracy by adding their initials indicating that this verification was performed.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING REFERENCE NUMBER 2019-001 FEDERAL PROGRAM FEDERAL WORK-STUDY PROGRAM (FWS) (CFDA 84.033) U.S. DEPARTEMENT OF EDUCATION AWARD NUMBER OPE ID: 02340600, FWS ID: 006429 COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT SPECIAL TEST AND PROVISION ? DISBURSEMENT TO OR ON BEHALF OF STUDENT TYPE OF FINDING SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY AND NONCOMPLIANCE CRITERIA OR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT As established in 34 CFR ? 675.16 Payments to Students, states that; (a)(4) regardless of who employs the student, the Institution is responsible for ensuring that the student is paid for work performed, (a)(5) a student?s FWS compensation is earned when the student performs the work and (a)(9) an Institution makes a disbursement of FWS program funds on the date that the Institution credit?s a student?s account at the Institution or pays a student directly with funds received from the secretary; or institutional funds used in advance of receiving FWS program funds. CONDITION During our test performed over the FWS disbursements on behalf of student sample, we reviewed the accuracy of the student time sheet, and we found that the Institution paid four (4) hours less to a student for compensation earned per work performed. According to the Student?s Time Sheet, the student should receive an FWS compensation of 23.5 hours worked during the month of January 2019. After this time sheet was approved by a supervisor, the payment for this student was issued for 19.5 hours instead of 23.5 hours as indicated in the time sheet signed by the student. EFFECT The Institution did not pay the full amount of the student?s FWS compensation earned and have the right to receive per the federal program regulations. The student did not receive the full amount of FWS compensation to which he was entitled according to the approved FWS funds. QUESTIONED COSTS Not determined CONTEXT The Institution approved a payment for a different total of hours than the stated in the student?s time sheet reviewed and signed by the supervising personnel. CAUSE The Institution did not adequately review the student?s time sheet for the accuracy payment issuance purpose. IDENTIFICATION AS A REPEAT FINDING N/A RECOMMENDATION The Institution should improve their internal control procedures to monitor the total hours of work performed by the students in order to pay the correct amount of FWS compensation to the student in accordance with the time sheet. In addition, the Institution should implement an internal control procedure that requires that the Student Financial Assistance Director verify the time sheet mathematical accuracy by adding their initials indicating that this verification was performed.

Corrective Action Plan

VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS AND PLANNED CORRECTIVE ACTION The Institution had implemented immediately additional procedures to ensure that the FWS student is paid correctly for work performed. For this reason, the time sheet has been redesigned in order to improve the accuracy of calculation of total hours worked by an FWS student. The new time sheet is designed to include space for calculation of total hours worked by the student and the calculation of amount to be paid all in one (1) page, instead of two (2) or three (3) pages. In addition, to improve internal control procedures and to document better the supervision process, the new time sheet has space to be signed by the official who performed the calculations and prepares the payroll, and another space for the initials of the Financial Aid Director who will verified that the time sheet calculations are correct.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,279,730 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 7, 2019 — management decision was due July 7, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,171,171 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 22, 2018 — management decision was due September 22, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,203,614 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 23, 2017 — management decision was due July 23, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Puerto Rico

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.