← Back to home

Webster County School DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 646001219

UEI: C81TSHDU9TF9

Audited by: Watkins, Ward and Stafford PLLC

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Webster County School District8 audit years3 findings
8
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$6.9M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2023)

FY 2023-06-30

$6,865,761 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on April 1, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 1, 2026 (24 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2022-06-30

UNMODIFIED OPINION, QUALIFIED OPINIONMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,147,839 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 8, 2024 — management decision was due January 8, 2025.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,027,438 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 26, 2022 — management decision was due March 26, 2023.

FY 2020-06-30

$2,103,140 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 28, 2021 — management decision was due March 28, 2022.

FY 2019-06-30

$2,014,757 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2020 — management decision was due September 30, 2020.

2019-001
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

During our audit testing of allowable costs in the Special Education Cluster we noted the district reimbursed indirect costs in excess of allowable amounts by $529 from the Special education ? grants to states (CFDA#84.027) program during the fiscal year. We also noted an excess of $29 was pulled from the Special education ? preschool grants (CFDA#84.173) during the fiscal year. Effect: Inadequate controls over calculation of indirect costs could resulted in the district repaying program funds. Cause: The condition occurred due to the district reimbursing these funds prior to the close of the applicable grant year.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: The district must reimburse indirect costs at allowable amounts. The costs must be reimbursed at the restricted rate and should not include any capital outlay expenditures. The reimbursement also may not exceed the amount budgeted from the program. Condition: During our audit testing of allowable costs in the Special Education Cluster we noted the district reimbursed indirect costs in excess of allowable amounts by $529 from the Special education ? grants to states (CFDA#84.027) program during the fiscal year. We also noted an excess of $29 was pulled from the Special education ? preschool grants (CFDA#84.173) during the fiscal year. Effect: Inadequate controls over calculation of indirect costs could resulted in the district repaying program funds. Cause: The condition occurred due to the district reimbursing these funds prior to the close of the applicable grant year.

Corrective Action Plan

DISTRICT RESPONSE Finding A. Superintendent? Brian Jones 2019-001 Business Administrator ? Angela Avent-White B. Indirect Cost will be taken from Federal Special Education Funds at the end of the project period after a careful calculation of the allowed amount, not to exceed the allowable budgeted amount. Indirect cost taken from FY19 but not yet allowed as of 1/31/2020 expenditures has been returned to the project by the means of MCAPS. C. Completion Date: January 31, 2020

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2019-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

During our audit testing of allowable costs in the Title I program we noted the district reimbursed indirect costs in excess of allowable amounts by $2,816 from the Title I program during the fiscal year. The overpayment from the 2018 program year was $15 and the overpayment from the 2019 program year was $2,801. Effect: Inadequate controls over calculation of indirect costs could resulted in the district repaying program funds. Cause: The condition occurred due to the district reimbursing these funds prior to the close of the applicable grant year.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: The district must reimburse indirect costs at allowable amounts. The costs must be reimbursed at the restricted rate and should not include any capital outlay expenditures. The reimbursement also may not exceed the amount budgeted from the program. Condition: During our audit testing of allowable costs in the Title I program we noted the district reimbursed indirect costs in excess of allowable amounts by $2,816 from the Title I program during the fiscal year. The overpayment from the 2018 program year was $15 and the overpayment from the 2019 program year was $2,801. Effect: Inadequate controls over calculation of indirect costs could resulted in the district repaying program funds. Cause: The condition occurred due to the district reimbursing these funds prior to the close of the applicable grant year.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding A. Superintendent - Brian Jones 2019-002 Business Administrator ? Angela Avent-White B. Indirect Cost will be taken from Title I Funds at the end of the project period after a careful calculation of the allowed amount, not to exceed the allowable budgeted amount. Indirect cost taken from FY19 but not yet allowed as of 1/31/2020 expenditures has been returned to the project by the means of MCAPS. C. Completion Date: January 31, 2020

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,896,123 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 7, 2019 — management decision was due January 7, 2020.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,003,840 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2018 — management decision was due September 28, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,036,820 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2017 — management decision was due September 28, 2017.

2016-003
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Mississippi

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.