ITAWAMBA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTLocal Government

EIN: 646000498

UEI: M73JVL65GQ44

Audited by: MCKENZIE CPA, PLLC

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

ITAWAMBA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT8 audit years2 findings
8
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$8.4M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2023)

FY 2023-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$8,388,252 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 20, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 20, 2026 (22 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2022-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$6,942,572 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 15, 2025 — management decision was due March 15, 2026.

FY 2021-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$6,378,822 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 30, 2025 — management decision was due October 30, 2025.

FY 2020-06-30

$3,831,721 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 27, 2021 — management decision was due January 27, 2022.

FY 2019-06-30

UNMODIFIED OPINION, QUALIFIED OPINIONMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$3,845,227 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2020 — management decision was due September 26, 2020.

2019-004
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

During the course of the audit, we noted that the school district Title I funds were moved to the District Maintenance Fund. Context: The district had moved $313,410 at June 30, 2019 from Title I Fund to General Fund for which adequate support was not provided. Questioned Costs: $313,410. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid: No. Identification of a repeat finding: No. Cause: The school district moved funds to the District Maintenance Fund from the Title I Fund in order to eliminate a positive fund balance in the Title I Fund. Effect: Due to the possibility of the district being held accountable for these funds, there could be a potential liability. Recommendation: We recommend the district only request federal funds after the applicable program costs have been paid for by the district. Views of responsible official: We do not do request of funds until expenses have been paid for. Business Manager and Federal Programs director work very closely to ensure no funds are drawn down before expenses. We as a district disagree with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Material Weakness and Noncompliance Finding 2019-004 Program: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Passed-Through Mississippi Department of Education CFDA Number: 84.010 Compliance Requirement: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Criteria: Management is responsible for compliance with the activities allowed or unallowed requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Federal funds should be used in a manner that is consistent with federal program regulations. Condition: During the course of the audit, we noted that the school district Title I funds were moved to the District Maintenance Fund. Context: The district had moved $313,410 at June 30, 2019 from Title I Fund to General Fund for which adequate support was not provided. Questioned Costs: $313,410. Whether Sampling was Statistically Valid: No. Identification of a repeat finding: No. Cause: The school district moved funds to the District Maintenance Fund from the Title I Fund in order to eliminate a positive fund balance in the Title I Fund. Effect: Due to the possibility of the district being held accountable for these funds, there could be a potential liability. Recommendation: We recommend the district only request federal funds after the applicable program costs have been paid for by the district. Views of responsible official: We do not do request of funds until expenses have been paid for. Business Manager and Federal Programs director work very closely to ensure no funds are drawn down before expenses. We as a district disagree with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

We do not do request of funds until expenses have been paid for. Business Manager and Federal Programs director work very closely to ensure no funds are drawn down before expenses. We as a district disagree with the finding.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →

FY 2018-06-30

$3,651,238 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 12, 2019 — management decision was due November 12, 2019.

2018-003
Cash Management
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Cash Management →

FY 2017-06-30

$3,569,133 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 21, 2018 — management decision was due February 21, 2019.

FY 2016-06-30

$3,716,106 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 7, 2017 — management decision was due September 7, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.