EIN: 636001579
UEI: UTHUGAVPKVV7
Audited by: Warren Averett, LLC
Cognizant agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on May 1, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 1, 2026 (56 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on April 16, 2025 — management decision was due October 16, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on April 22, 2025 — management decision was due October 22, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on April 22, 2024 — management decision was due October 22, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on May 2, 2023 — management decision was due November 2, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on June 3, 2022 — management decision was due December 3, 2022.
During the audit, revisions were made to the SEFA to correct expenditures passed through to subrecipients that were not accurately reported. These revisions impacted the total federal expenditures reported on the SEFA and the major program determination. In addition, of the five subrecipients selected for testing, we noted the following: 1) All five agreements with the subrecipients did not clearly contain the Assistance Listing number and name, subrecipients? unique entity identifier or the federal award date. 2) A risk assessment was not formally documented for subrecipients. 3) While the Commission has a process in place to approve all expenditures prior to disbursement, there was no formal documentation of the review retained by the Commission. Additionally, an on-site review of the subrecipients was not performed and financial and programmatic reports were not provided to the Commission for review. 4) The Commission did not verify that every subrecipient received a Single Audit when applicable. No review of Single Audits was performed by the Commission. Cause: Program managers, Department of Finance or other Commission personnel are responsible to ensure accurate information is reported as federal expenditures on the SEFA. Due to the decentralized nature of grant management within the Commission?s departments and divisions that receive federal assistance, amounts may not be accurately or completely reported. Additionally, the Commission?s policies and procedures were not properly aligned with the requirements applicable to subrecipients. JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMISSION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 16 Effect: The lack of effective internal controls over the preparation of the SEFA could result in the inaccurate reporting of the Commission?s expenditures as reported on the SEFA. The Commission is not in compliance with Federal requirements as outlined in 2 CFR 200.302(b)(1) and 2 CFR 200 Section 200.332 related to subrecipient monitoring. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: At the time of audit, subrecipient expenditures were misstated for two of the major programs. Total Federal expenditures for the Coronavirus Relief Fund were $37,892,774 for the year ended September 30, 2021. Total subrecipient expenditures for the year ended September 30, 2021 were $4,632,735. Repeat Finding: No. Auditors? Recommendation: As part of an effective internal control system, we recommend that the Commission develop procedures to ensure that all information included in the SEFA is correctly reported. We also recommend that the Commission update policies and procedures to ensure that all required elements are communicated to subrecipients at the time subawards are made or in subsequent subaward modifications if data elements change. Further, the Commission should ensure that risk assessments related to subrecipients and monitoring of subrecipients are formally documented. Views of Responsible Officials: See Management?s Response and Corrective Action Plan included at the end of the report.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2021-001 ? Subrecipient Monitoring ? Significant Deficiency Information on the Federal Program: COVID-19 Coronavirus Relief Fund, Assistance Listing #21.019 Criteria: 2 CFR 200.302(b)(1) of the Uniform Guidance states that a nonfederal entity must identify in its accounts all federal awards received and expended, as well as the federal programs under which they were received. The Uniform Guidance also requires federal expenditures to be recorded properly and timely to ensure accuracy and completeness of the expenditure amounts reported on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA). 2 CFR 200.332 requires pass-through entities follow certain requirements with respect to subrecipients. A summary of the requirements includes (1) subawards include certain required information, (2) the pass-through entity performs a risk assessment over each subrecipient, (3) imposing specific subaward conditions upon a subrecipient if appropriate, (4) monitor the activities of the subrecipient, (5) perform additional monitoring if necessary based on the risk assessment, (6) verify each subrecipient is audited if the subrecipient's Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the single audit threshold, (7) consider the results of the subrecipient's audits, on-site reviews or other monitoring, and (8) take enforcement action against noncompliant subrecipients if necessary. Condition: During the audit, revisions were made to the SEFA to correct expenditures passed through to subrecipients that were not accurately reported. These revisions impacted the total federal expenditures reported on the SEFA and the major program determination. In addition, of the five subrecipients selected for testing, we noted the following: 1) All five agreements with the subrecipients did not clearly contain the Assistance Listing number and name, subrecipients? unique entity identifier or the federal award date. 2) A risk assessment was not formally documented for subrecipients. 3) While the Commission has a process in place to approve all expenditures prior to disbursement, there was no formal documentation of the review retained by the Commission. Additionally, an on-site review of the subrecipients was not performed and financial and programmatic reports were not provided to the Commission for review. 4) The Commission did not verify that every subrecipient received a Single Audit when applicable. No review of Single Audits was performed by the Commission. Cause: Program managers, Department of Finance or other Commission personnel are responsible to ensure accurate information is reported as federal expenditures on the SEFA. Due to the decentralized nature of grant management within the Commission?s departments and divisions that receive federal assistance, amounts may not be accurately or completely reported. Additionally, the Commission?s policies and procedures were not properly aligned with the requirements applicable to subrecipients. JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMISSION SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 16 Effect: The lack of effective internal controls over the preparation of the SEFA could result in the inaccurate reporting of the Commission?s expenditures as reported on the SEFA. The Commission is not in compliance with Federal requirements as outlined in 2 CFR 200.302(b)(1) and 2 CFR 200 Section 200.332 related to subrecipient monitoring. Questioned Costs: N/A Context: At the time of audit, subrecipient expenditures were misstated for two of the major programs. Total Federal expenditures for the Coronavirus Relief Fund were $37,892,774 for the year ended September 30, 2021. Total subrecipient expenditures for the year ended September 30, 2021 were $4,632,735. Repeat Finding: No. Auditors? Recommendation: As part of an effective internal control system, we recommend that the Commission develop procedures to ensure that all information included in the SEFA is correctly reported. We also recommend that the Commission update policies and procedures to ensure that all required elements are communicated to subrecipients at the time subawards are made or in subsequent subaward modifications if data elements change. Further, the Commission should ensure that risk assessments related to subrecipients and monitoring of subrecipients are formally documented. Views of Responsible Officials: See Management?s Response and Corrective Action Plan included at the end of the report.
Finding: 2021-001 ? Subrecipient Monitoring Status: Partially Complete Management?s Corrective Action Plan: The Jefferson County Commission concurs with the finding. The Finance Department will conduct additional training on year end closeout processes to ensure grant activities are properly reflected in the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA). Preparation of the SEFA will be centralized in the Finance department and quality control measures will be implemented to ensure the SEFA is properly reviewed and approved in a timely manner. To properly address subrecipient monitoring, Jefferson County will determine, during the program design phase, if there is a sub-recipient, beneficiary, or contractor relationship. Once that determination is made, contracts will be drafted to include all required data elements. Subrecipient expenditures incurred will be analyzed to determine the level of monitoring required based upon the assessment of the risk of non-compliance with the grant requirements. The results of the assessment as well as any documentation obtained to demonstrate compliance with grant requirements will be included as part of the subrecipient?s files and will be available for any future audits. The County and its consultant, Witt O?Brien?s, will also draft and utilize a monitoring plan to ensure compliance with 2 CFR 200.332 for any applicable grants. Responsible Party: Angela M. Dixon, Chief Financial Officer Expected Completion Date: September 30, 2022
FAC accepted this audit on May 24, 2021 — management decision was due November 24, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on April 2, 2020 — management decision was due October 2, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on April 14, 2019 — management decision was due October 14, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on April 11, 2018 — management decision was due October 11, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2017 — management decision was due September 30, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Alabama →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.