EIN: 636000916
UEI: N74WBDJKYA34
Audited by: Alabama Department of Examiners of Public Accounts
Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on July 9, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by January 9, 2027 (131 days from today).
What is a management decision? →Title 29, U. S. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 5, Sub-Part A Davis Bacon and Related Acts Provisions and Procedures (the “Davis-Bacon Act”), requires that any construction contract in excess of $2,000 that is funded wholly or in part by federal funds include prevailing wage rate clauses. The laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for locality of project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) and the contractor or subcontractor must submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). During the fiscal year 2024, the Henry County Board of Education (the “Board”) expended $1,270,487.00 of COVID-19 Education Stabilization Funds (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief) on construction projects. The Board’s contracts did not include the required prevailing wage rate clauses nor were certified payrolls submitted by the contractors. The Board did not ensure the Davis-Bacon Act wage rate requirements were included in construction contracts; therefore, COVID-19 Education Stabilization Funds (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief) funds were used to pay contracts that did not include prevailing wage rate clauses, nor did the Board ensure that contractors submitted weekly certified payrolls. As a result, the Board is not in compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act as it pertains to wage rate requirements. This finding was originally reported as Finding 2023-001.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Title 29, U. S. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 5, Sub-Part A Davis Bacon and Related Acts Provisions and Procedures (the “Davis-Bacon Act”), requires that any construction contract in excess of $2,000 that is funded wholly or in part by federal funds include prevailing wage rate clauses. The laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors to work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds must be paid wages not less than those established for locality of project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL) and the contractor or subcontractor must submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). During the fiscal year 2024, the Henry County Board of Education (the “Board”) expended $1,270,487.00 of COVID-19 Education Stabilization Funds (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief) on construction projects. The Board’s contracts did not include the required prevailing wage rate clauses nor were certified payrolls submitted by the contractors. The Board did not ensure the Davis-Bacon Act wage rate requirements were included in construction contracts; therefore, COVID-19 Education Stabilization Funds (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief) funds were used to pay contracts that did not include prevailing wage rate clauses, nor did the Board ensure that contractors submitted weekly certified payrolls. As a result, the Board is not in compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act as it pertains to wage rate requirements. This finding was originally reported as Finding 2023-001.
The Board should comply with Title 29, U. S. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 5, Sub-Part A Davis Bacon and Related Acts Provisions and Procedures (the “Davis-Bacon Act”) when using COVID-19 Education Stabilization Funds to fund construction contracts in excess of $2,000.00 with the use of mechanics and laborers.
2023-001
FAC accepted this audit on October 2, 2025 — management decision was due April 2, 2026.
Item 2023-001 Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) ALN# 84.425 U.S. Department of Education Passed through the State Department of Education Grant period – Year ended September 30, 2023 (84.425U) (84.425D) Criteria – Grantees should have controls in place to ensure that contractors and subcontractors are notified of the requirement to pay prevailing wage rates to all laborers and mechanics employed on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds and to submit weekly certified payrolls for each week in which contract work is performed. 2 CFR 200.303 requires the non_x0002_Federal entity to “(a) establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in accordance with all applicable statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” 2 CFR 200.326 and 29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction (DOL Regulations) require the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). Condition – There is a systemic lack of controls in place to ensure that contractors and subcontractors were notified of the requirements to comply with the wage rate requirements and provided timely certified payrolls throughout the construction projects. Cause – A clause describing the wage rate requirements was not added to the construction contracts. There was a lack of sufficient controls over the communication of this requirement to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the certified payrolls being provided to the Board. Effect – Lack of notification of the wage rate requirements to the contractors and subcontractors could lead to disallowed costs. We noted that payments to contractors did not have supporting documentation of certified payrolls. However, our audit disclosed no instances of unallowable costs. Questioned Costs – $316,382. Recommendation – We recommend the strengthening of controls to ensure the prevailing wage rate clauses are included in the contracts and that certified payrolls are received for each week in which construction work is performed. Management’s Response – The Board will strengthen the controls in place to provide assurance that proper prevailing wage rate clauses are added to construction contracts and certified payrolls are received from each week in which construction work is performed.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Item 2023-001 Special Tests and Provisions – Wage Rate Requirements Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) ALN# 84.425 U.S. Department of Education Passed through the State Department of Education Grant period – Year ended September 30, 2023 (84.425U) (84.425D) Criteria – Grantees should have controls in place to ensure that contractors and subcontractors are notified of the requirement to pay prevailing wage rates to all laborers and mechanics employed on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 financed by federal assistance funds and to submit weekly certified payrolls for each week in which contract work is performed. 2 CFR 200.303 requires the non_x0002_Federal entity to “(a) establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in accordance with all applicable statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” 2 CFR 200.326 and 29 CFR Part 5, Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Governing Federally Financed and Assisted Construction (DOL Regulations) require the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the nonfederal entity weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). Condition – There is a systemic lack of controls in place to ensure that contractors and subcontractors were notified of the requirements to comply with the wage rate requirements and provided timely certified payrolls throughout the construction projects. Cause – A clause describing the wage rate requirements was not added to the construction contracts. There was a lack of sufficient controls over the communication of this requirement to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the certified payrolls being provided to the Board. Effect – Lack of notification of the wage rate requirements to the contractors and subcontractors could lead to disallowed costs. We noted that payments to contractors did not have supporting documentation of certified payrolls. However, our audit disclosed no instances of unallowable costs. Questioned Costs – $316,382. Recommendation – We recommend the strengthening of controls to ensure the prevailing wage rate clauses are included in the contracts and that certified payrolls are received for each week in which construction work is performed. Management’s Response – The Board will strengthen the controls in place to provide assurance that proper prevailing wage rate clauses are added to construction contracts and certified payrolls are received from each week in which construction work is performed.
Finding 2023-001 - Special Tests and Provisions: Wage Rate Requirements Responsible Individual: Arlene Dickens, Chief School Financial Officer Corrective Action: Wage rate clauses will be included in all federally funded construction contracts. Contractors and subcontractors will be notified in writing of prevailing wage requirements, and certified payrolls will be required and reviewed for all weeks for which construction work is performed. Anticipated Completion Date: October 1, 2025
Item 2023-002 – Equipment and Real Property Management Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) ALN# 84.425 U.S. Department of Education Passed through the State Department of Education Grant period – Year ended September 30, 2023 (84.425U) (84.425D) Criteria – Grantees should have controls in place to ensure that all capital equipment or improvements to land, building, or equipment that were purchased with grant funds received prior approval prior to encumbrance of the expenditure. 2 CFR 200.303 requires the non-Federal entity to “(a) establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in accordance with all applicable statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” 2 CFR 200.313 and 2 CFR 200.439 requires that the following rules of allow ability must apply to equipment and other capital expenditures “Capital expenditures for special purpose equipment are allowable as direct costs, provided that items with a unit cost of $5,000 or more have the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity.” 2 CFR 200.439(d)(1) requires that property records must be maintained for equipment acquired under a federal award that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. A physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every two years. Condition – There is a systemic lack of controls in place to ensure that prior approval for capital expenditures for equipment acquisition or improvements to land, buildings, or equipment was obtained prior to incurring the expenditure. Additionally, controls were not in place to ensure that a physical inventory was taken at least once every two years. Cause – Certain capital equipment and improvements to building expenditures were not included in the approved budget to grantor. There was a lack of sufficient controls over the review of capital expenditures to ensure that they were included in the approved budget and that a physical inventory observation was made. Effect – Lack of approval over equipment and capital improvements could lead to disallowed costs. We noted that certain equipment and improvement projects were not included in approved budget for ESSER Funds. Failure to perform a physical inventory observation results in noncompliance with the grant agreement and could result in a misappropriation of assets. Questioned Costs – $57,438. Recommendation – We recommend the strengthening of controls to ensure that proper approval is received prior to the acquisition of improvements to land, building or equipment and that a physical inventory observation is conducted at least once every two years to ensure compliance with grant agreement. Management’s Response – The Board will strengthen the controls in place to provide assurance that proper approval is obtained from grantor agency prior to the purchase of equipment and real property and that a physical inventory observation is conducted at least once every two years.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Item 2023-002 – Equipment and Real Property Management Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) ALN# 84.425 U.S. Department of Education Passed through the State Department of Education Grant period – Year ended September 30, 2023 (84.425U) (84.425D) Criteria – Grantees should have controls in place to ensure that all capital equipment or improvements to land, building, or equipment that were purchased with grant funds received prior approval prior to encumbrance of the expenditure. 2 CFR 200.303 requires the non-Federal entity to “(a) establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in accordance with all applicable statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” 2 CFR 200.313 and 2 CFR 200.439 requires that the following rules of allow ability must apply to equipment and other capital expenditures “Capital expenditures for special purpose equipment are allowable as direct costs, provided that items with a unit cost of $5,000 or more have the prior written approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity.” 2 CFR 200.439(d)(1) requires that property records must be maintained for equipment acquired under a federal award that include a description of the property, a serial number or other identification number, the source of funding for the property (including the FAIN), who holds title, the acquisition date, and cost of the property, percentage of federal participation in the project costs for the federal award under which the property was acquired, the location, use and condition of the property, and any ultimate disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. A physical inventory of the property must be taken and the results reconciled with the property records at least once every two years. Condition – There is a systemic lack of controls in place to ensure that prior approval for capital expenditures for equipment acquisition or improvements to land, buildings, or equipment was obtained prior to incurring the expenditure. Additionally, controls were not in place to ensure that a physical inventory was taken at least once every two years. Cause – Certain capital equipment and improvements to building expenditures were not included in the approved budget to grantor. There was a lack of sufficient controls over the review of capital expenditures to ensure that they were included in the approved budget and that a physical inventory observation was made. Effect – Lack of approval over equipment and capital improvements could lead to disallowed costs. We noted that certain equipment and improvement projects were not included in approved budget for ESSER Funds. Failure to perform a physical inventory observation results in noncompliance with the grant agreement and could result in a misappropriation of assets. Questioned Costs – $57,438. Recommendation – We recommend the strengthening of controls to ensure that proper approval is received prior to the acquisition of improvements to land, building or equipment and that a physical inventory observation is conducted at least once every two years to ensure compliance with grant agreement. Management’s Response – The Board will strengthen the controls in place to provide assurance that proper approval is obtained from grantor agency prior to the purchase of equipment and real property and that a physical inventory observation is conducted at least once every two years.
Finding 2023-002 - Equipment and Real Property Management Responsible Individual: Arlene Dickens, Chief School Financial Officer Corrective Action: All capital expenditures will require documented prior approval from the grantor agency before encumbrance. Property records will be updated and maintained in accordance with 2 CFR 200.313 and 200.439. A physical inventory will be conducted and reconciled at least once every two years. Anticipated Completion Date: October 1, 2025
Item 2023-003 – Activities Allowed or Unallowed/Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) ALN# 84.425 U.S. Department of Education Passed through the State Department of Education Grant period – Year ended September 30, 2023 (84.425U) (84.425D) Criteria – Grantees should have controls in place to ensure that grant monies are for allowable costs and allowable activities. 2 CFR 200.303 requires the non-Federal entity to “(a) establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non_x0002_Federal entity is managing the Federal award in accordance with all applicable statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” Condition – In testing a statistically valid sample of 37 items, 7 did not show prior approval. There is a systemic lack of controls in place to ensure that prior approval for allowable costs/activities was obtained prior to incurring the expenditure. Cause – Certain cost charged against the grant for allowable cost/activities did not contain approval from the Superintendent as required. There was a lack of sufficient controls over the review of expenditures to ensure that they received proper approval prior to payment. Effect – Lack of approval over expenditures could lead to disallowed costs. Questioned Costs – N/A Recommendation – We recommend the strengthening of controls to ensure that proper approval is received prior to the encumbrance of an expenditure. Management’s Response – The Board will strengthen the controls in place to provide assurance that proper approval is obtained from required personnel prior to the encumbrance of an expenditure.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Item 2023-003 – Activities Allowed or Unallowed/Allowable Costs/Cost Principles Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) ALN# 84.425 U.S. Department of Education Passed through the State Department of Education Grant period – Year ended September 30, 2023 (84.425U) (84.425D) Criteria – Grantees should have controls in place to ensure that grant monies are for allowable costs and allowable activities. 2 CFR 200.303 requires the non-Federal entity to “(a) establish and maintain effective internal controls over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non_x0002_Federal entity is managing the Federal award in accordance with all applicable statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” Condition – In testing a statistically valid sample of 37 items, 7 did not show prior approval. There is a systemic lack of controls in place to ensure that prior approval for allowable costs/activities was obtained prior to incurring the expenditure. Cause – Certain cost charged against the grant for allowable cost/activities did not contain approval from the Superintendent as required. There was a lack of sufficient controls over the review of expenditures to ensure that they received proper approval prior to payment. Effect – Lack of approval over expenditures could lead to disallowed costs. Questioned Costs – N/A Recommendation – We recommend the strengthening of controls to ensure that proper approval is received prior to the encumbrance of an expenditure. Management’s Response – The Board will strengthen the controls in place to provide assurance that proper approval is obtained from required personnel prior to the encumbrance of an expenditure.
Finding 2023-003 - Activities Allowed or Unallowed/ Allowable Costs/ Cost Principles Responsible Individual: Arlene Dickens, Chief School Financial Officer Corrective Action: A review process has been established requiring Superintendent approval before expenditures are charged to the grant. Supporting documentation will be maintained to verify prior approval for all allowable costs and activities. Anticipated Completion Date: October 1, 2025
FAC accepted this audit on August 10, 2023 — management decision was due February 10, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on December 26, 2022 — management decision was due June 26, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on September 16, 2021 — management decision was due March 16, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on July 16, 2020 — management decision was due January 16, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on May 22, 2019 — management decision was due November 22, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on June 13, 2018 — management decision was due December 13, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on June 27, 2017 — management decision was due December 27, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Alabama →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.