← Back to home

Tuscaloosa City Board of EducationLocal Government

EIN: 636000811

UEI: GEYEJ3KMC6N5

Audited by: Alabama Department of Examiners of Public Accounts

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

Tuscaloosa City Board of Education10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$24.4M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$24,444,209 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 30, 2026 (20 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →

FY 2024-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$39,471,758 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 1, 2025 — management decision was due November 1, 2025.

FY 2023-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$30,995,969 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 18, 2024 — management decision was due September 18, 2024.

FY 2022-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$33,710,699 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 20, 2023 — management decision was due October 20, 2023.

FY 2021-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$22,186,315 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 26, 2022 — management decision was due December 26, 2022.

FY 2020-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$17,057,418 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 22, 2021 — management decision was due October 22, 2021.

FY 2019-09-30

$17,345,790 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on August 16, 2020 — management decision was due February 16, 2021.

2019-003
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

An adequate system of internal control requires the incorporation of segregation of duties, or proper reviews when adequate segregation of duties cannot be achieved, to ensure the controls are operating effectively. During the audit period, management of the Board noticed unusual activity regarding payments to a vendor. Upon further investigation by management, it was determined, an employee of the board requested approval for a new vendor in the accounting system during fiscal year 2017. Beginning in August 2017, the employee processed, and submitted for payment, invoices from this vendor for electrical/mechanical repairs at various local schools. Management determined this work was never performed at any of the local schools. The first fraudulent invoice was submitted to department superiors for approval. Subsequently, the employee copied the approved signature from the first fraudulent invoice to be used on all future invoices from this vendor. These fraudulent invoices were processed and submitted to be paid until this was discovered in June 2019 due to an unrelated investigation of the employee. Additionally, it was later determined by management that the vendor bank account used to deposit funds received for these fraudulent invoices was the same bank account used by the employee who requested the vendor's approval into the system. As a result, Child Nutrition Program funds were used to pay fictitious invoices in the amount of $53,109.59 from August 2017 through June 2019. The Board?s internal control system was not being adequately monitored to ensure effective operation of the Child Nutrition Program. As a result of not properly monitoring their internal control system, the Tuscaloosa City Board of Education suffered a financial loss by theft.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

An adequate system of internal control requires the incorporation of segregation of duties, or proper reviews when adequate segregation of duties cannot be achieved, to ensure the controls are operating effectively. During the audit period, management of the Board noticed unusual activity regarding payments to a vendor. Upon further investigation by management, it was determined, an employee of the board requested approval for a new vendor in the accounting system during fiscal year 2017. Beginning in August 2017, the employee processed, and submitted for payment, invoices from this vendor for electrical/mechanical repairs at various local schools. Management determined this work was never performed at any of the local schools. The first fraudulent invoice was submitted to department superiors for approval. Subsequently, the employee copied the approved signature from the first fraudulent invoice to be used on all future invoices from this vendor. These fraudulent invoices were processed and submitted to be paid until this was discovered in June 2019 due to an unrelated investigation of the employee. Additionally, it was later determined by management that the vendor bank account used to deposit funds received for these fraudulent invoices was the same bank account used by the employee who requested the vendor's approval into the system. As a result, Child Nutrition Program funds were used to pay fictitious invoices in the amount of $53,109.59 from August 2017 through June 2019. The Board?s internal control system was not being adequately monitored to ensure effective operation of the Child Nutrition Program. As a result of not properly monitoring their internal control system, the Tuscaloosa City Board of Education suffered a financial loss by theft.

Corrective Action Plan

The Tuscaloosa City Board of Education should design, implement and monitor an adequate system of internal control which incorporates proper segregation of duties and adequate supervisory reviews.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2018-09-30

$16,784,151 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 26, 2019 — management decision was due December 26, 2019.

FY 2017-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$16,942,734 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 22, 2018 — management decision was due February 22, 2019.

FY 2016-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$16,913,345 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 20, 2017 — management decision was due December 20, 2017.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Alabama

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.