← Back to home

THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ALABAMANon-Profit

EIN: 630307306

UEI: MLH7GVM3WF41

Audited by: Deloitte & Touche LLP

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ALABAMA5 audit years1 findings
5
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.2M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,225,273 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on July 30, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by January 30, 2027 (152 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

FINDING 2025-001 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Grantor: Alabama Department of Mental Health Federal Program: Maternal and Child Health Federal Consolidated Programs ALN: 93.110 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 paragraph (a)(2), informal procurement methods are required when the aggregate dollar amount of the procurement transaction is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. Condition/Context: For the three selected vendors, it was determined based on vendor expenditures that the Company should have followed federal guidance for informal procurement methods for simplified acquisitions. During procurement testing, it was determined that the Company did not consistently retain documentation to support that vendors were selected in accordance with federal guidance for informal procurement methods for simplified acquisitions whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified vendors. Cause: Due to the infrequency of entering into contracts above the micro-purchase threshold, management followed the Company’s existing procurement policy which does not include procedures or guidance for procurement of vendors under federal awards. Effect: Grant funded contracts could be awarded to vendors that are less cost effective, which would be in violation of federal regulations and may result in early termination of the grant award, non-reimbursement of grant funding, or cessation of future funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Management should enhance the Company’s procurement policies for grant-funded purchases to align with federal procurement guidance. Repeat Finding: No. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2025-001 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance and Noncompliance – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Grantor: Alabama Department of Mental Health Federal Program: Maternal and Child Health Federal Consolidated Programs ALN: 93.110 Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.320 paragraph (a)(2), informal procurement methods are required when the aggregate dollar amount of the procurement transaction is higher than the micro-purchase threshold but does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. Condition/Context: For the three selected vendors, it was determined based on vendor expenditures that the Company should have followed federal guidance for informal procurement methods for simplified acquisitions. During procurement testing, it was determined that the Company did not consistently retain documentation to support that vendors were selected in accordance with federal guidance for informal procurement methods for simplified acquisitions whereby price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified vendors. Cause: Due to the infrequency of entering into contracts above the micro-purchase threshold, management followed the Company’s existing procurement policy which does not include procedures or guidance for procurement of vendors under federal awards. Effect: Grant funded contracts could be awarded to vendors that are less cost effective, which would be in violation of federal regulations and may result in early termination of the grant award, non-reimbursement of grant funding, or cessation of future funding. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Management should enhance the Company’s procurement policies for grant-funded purchases to align with federal procurement guidance. Repeat Finding: No. Views of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

The Company will enhance the existing procurement policy for grant-funded purchases to align with federal procurement guidelines. Price quotations and comparisons will be obtained from an adequate number of vendors and such quotations and comparisons will be retained to support vendor selection. Anticipated Completion Date: 12/31/2026 Responsible Contact Person: Rebecca Horn, Controller

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2024-12-31

$936,971 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 4, 2025 — management decision was due February 4, 2026.

FY 2023-12-31

$827,453 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 19, 2024 — management decision was due March 19, 2025.

FY 2021-12-31

$70,154,647 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 22, 2022 — management decision was due March 22, 2023.

FY 2018-12-31

$779,758 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 26, 2019 — management decision was due March 26, 2020.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Alabama

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.