← Back to home

Talladega CollegeHigher Education

EIN: 630288870

UEI: Q9D9V1H5J547

Audited by: Mauldin & Jenkins, LLC

Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Talladega College10 audit years3 findings
10
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$34.9M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$34,882,455 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 27, 2026 (27 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

During our test of 51 procurement transactions, we noted that for 12 contracts (exceeding the $25,000 threshold), the College could not provide documentation that a suspension and debarment check had been performed via SAM.gov prior to the award. Additionally, the contracts did not include a provision requiring the contractor to certify their eligibility. Cause: Management had not implemented a formal, documented process requiring staff to perform and retain evidence of SAM.gov checks for all covered transactions. Staff involved in the procurement process were unaware of the specific documentation requirements under the Uniform Guidance. Effect: The College entered into contracts with vendors without verifying their eligibility to receive federal funds. While our subsequent search of SAM.gov revealed that the vendors involved were not actually suspended or debarred, the College was in violation of federal compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: None (since the vendors were not actually excluded). Recommendation: Management should draft and adopt a formal procurement manual. For every federally funded purchase exceeding the micro-purchase threshold, staff must print and file a SAM.gov "Exclusion Search" result prior to executing the contract. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. We are currently implementing a new procurement checklist that requires a printed copy of the SAM.gov search result to be attached to the purchase order packet. Staff training on federal procurement requirements will be required.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program: Higher Education Institutional Aid (Title III) Assistance Listing Number: 84.031 Compliance Requirement: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Criteria: Per 2 CFR § 180.220 and 2 CFR § 200.318, non-federal entities are required to have written procurement policies and procedures governing the acquisition of goods and services funded by federal awards. Furthermore, a non-federal entity is prohibited from contracting with or making subawards to parties that are suspended or debarred. Recipients must verify that the entity is not excluded or disqualified by checking the System for Award Management (SAM.gov), collecting a certification from the entity, or adding a clause or condition to the contract. Condition: During our test of 51 procurement transactions, we noted that for 12 contracts (exceeding the $25,000 threshold), the College could not provide documentation that a suspension and debarment check had been performed via SAM.gov prior to the award. Additionally, the contracts did not include a provision requiring the contractor to certify their eligibility. Cause: Management had not implemented a formal, documented process requiring staff to perform and retain evidence of SAM.gov checks for all covered transactions. Staff involved in the procurement process were unaware of the specific documentation requirements under the Uniform Guidance. Effect: The College entered into contracts with vendors without verifying their eligibility to receive federal funds. While our subsequent search of SAM.gov revealed that the vendors involved were not actually suspended or debarred, the College was in violation of federal compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: None (since the vendors were not actually excluded). Recommendation: Management should draft and adopt a formal procurement manual. For every federally funded purchase exceeding the micro-purchase threshold, staff must print and file a SAM.gov "Exclusion Search" result prior to executing the contract. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. We are currently implementing a new procurement checklist that requires a printed copy of the SAM.gov search result to be attached to the purchase order packet. Staff training on federal procurement requirements will be required.

Corrective Action Plan

1. Finding Summary: The College entered into contracts with vendors without verifying their eligibility to receive federal funds. Testing of 50 procurement transactions identified that the College could not provide documentation that a suspension or debarment check had been performed via SAM.gov prior to the award for 13 contracts (exceeding the $25,000 threshold). Additionally, the contracts did not include a provision requiring the contractor to certify their eligibility. While the subsequent search of SAM.gov revealed that the vendors involved were not actually suspended or debarred, the College was in violation of federal compliance requirements. 2. Management’s Position – Management agrees with the finding. We are currently implementing a new procurement checklist that requires a printed copy of the SAM.gov search results to be attached to the purchase order packet. Staff training on federal procurement requirements will be required. 3. Corrective Action – Management will adhere to new procurement checklist that requires a printed copy of the SAM.gov search results to be attached to the purchase order packet. Management will consider whether certain contracts will require the contractor to certify their eligibility as part of the request for proposal or submission of a final contract. Staff training on federal procurement requirements will be required, with a target completion date prior to July 1, 2026. 4. Responsible Party – While the Office of Sponsored Research and Programs will be responsible for adherence to the policy and completing the checklist, the VP of Finance & Administration will monitor compliance of this process. Additionally, the VP of Finance & Administration will reinforce adherence of the new policy with personnel involved with any federal contracts, specifically ensuring that the executive cabinet members are aware as well as the Director of Sponsored Programs. 5. Implementation Timeline – Implementation effective July 1, 2026. 6. Status of Corrective Action (if related to prior year) – Corrective actions are in progress.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2024-06-30

$14,317,327 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 20, 2026 — management decision was due July 20, 2026.

2024-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

Condition Documentation supporting Title III expenditures could not be located for certain transactions selected. Criteria 2 CFR Part 200.400(d) states, " [t]he accounting practices of the recipient and subrecipient must be consistent with these cost principles and support the accumulation of costs as required by these cost principles, including maintaining adequate documentation to support costs charged to the Federal Award." Further, OMB A-133 Compliance Supplement, Compliance requirement B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles "Basic Guidelines".. require that expenses/expenditures charged to federal programs be adequately documented. Cause Controls for accumulating and maintaining supporting documentation for Federal award expenditure were not followed. Effect Costs charged to Title III program may be disallowed. Context A sample of 35 non-payroll expenditures totaling $502,650 was selected for testing from a population of 173 totaling $142,441. Testing found that 9 expenditure transactions contained inadequate or no supporting documentation. Our sample was not statistical. Recommendation We recommend the College should review the Title III expenditures charged to the program during fiscal year 2024 to determine the allowability of the costs.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition Documentation supporting Title III expenditures could not be located for certain transactions selected. Criteria 2 CFR Part 200.400(d) states, " [t]he accounting practices of the recipient and subrecipient must be consistent with these cost principles and support the accumulation of costs as required by these cost principles, including maintaining adequate documentation to support costs charged to the Federal Award." Further, OMB A-133 Compliance Supplement, Compliance requirement B. Allowable Costs/Cost Principles "Basic Guidelines".. require that expenses/expenditures charged to federal programs be adequately documented. Cause Controls for accumulating and maintaining supporting documentation for Federal award expenditure were not followed. Effect Costs charged to Title III program may be disallowed. Context A sample of 35 non-payroll expenditures totaling $502,650 was selected for testing from a population of 173 totaling $142,441. Testing found that 9 expenditure transactions contained inadequate or no supporting documentation. Our sample was not statistical. Recommendation We recommend the College should review the Title III expenditures charged to the program during fiscal year 2024 to determine the allowability of the costs.

Corrective Action Plan

If ED has questions regarding this plan, please contact Dr. Douglas Allen, Vice President for Finance and Administration, Talladega College at (256) 761-6100.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →

FY 2023-06-30

$24,268,872 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 21, 2024 — management decision was due September 21, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

$22,506,882 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 9, 2023 — management decision was due January 9, 2024.

FY 2021-06-30

$26,056,298 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on July 31, 2022 — management decision was due January 31, 2023.

2021-001
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSOTHER MATTERS

2021-01 Late Submission of Audit to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse Criteria Title 2 Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Requirements of Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), paragraph 200.512(a)(1),states that the audit must be completed and that data collection form submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report or nine months after the end of the audit period, whichever is earlier. Condition The College's audit reporting package for 2021 audit was not completed and submitted to the Federal Clearinghouse,as required. Cause Audit delays including the need for significant audit adjustments caused delay's in audit's completion and submission to the Clearinghouse. Effect The College did not comply with the terms if the Uniform Guidance Subpart F audit report submission requirements. Recommendation We recommend that management of the College make the necessary changes in personnel and examine those areas as needed to insure that all reporting requirements, and submission time frame as it relates to audited financial statements be corrected as soon as possible.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2021-01 Late Submission of Audit to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse Criteria Title 2 Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Requirements of Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance), paragraph 200.512(a)(1),states that the audit must be completed and that data collection form submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor's report or nine months after the end of the audit period, whichever is earlier. Condition The College's audit reporting package for 2021 audit was not completed and submitted to the Federal Clearinghouse,as required. Cause Audit delays including the need for significant audit adjustments caused delay's in audit's completion and submission to the Clearinghouse. Effect The College did not comply with the terms if the Uniform Guidance Subpart F audit report submission requirements. Recommendation We recommend that management of the College make the necessary changes in personnel and examine those areas as needed to insure that all reporting requirements, and submission time frame as it relates to audited financial statements be corrected as soon as possible.

Corrective Action Plan

College Response The College concurs with recommendation and will examine staffing to ensure that audits are completed and submitted to cognizant agencies on time.

About Reporting →

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$20,613,308 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 5, 2021 — management decision was due November 5, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$19,236,206 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 5, 2021 — management decision was due November 5, 2021.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$13,352,280 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2019 — management decision was due October 1, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$11,402,521 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 2, 2018 — management decision was due October 2, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$14,229,673 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 2, 2018 — management decision was due October 2, 2018.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Alabama

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.