← Back to home

SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTENon-Profit

EIN: 630288868

UEI: CDZJAJJHJMH5

Audited by: Warren Averett, LLC

Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE11 audit years3 findings
11
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$13.4M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2026)

FY 2026-01-02

$13,435,250 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FY 2024-12-31

$10,474,917 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 11, 2025 — management decision was due December 11, 2025.

FY 2023-12-29

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$16,246,303 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 27, 2024 — management decision was due March 27, 2025.

2023-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2023-003 – Procurement, Non-compliance (Material Weakness) Federal programs: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Criteria: The Federal Government requires that all procurement transactions for the acquisition of property or services required under a Federal award must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of 2 CFR section 200.319 and 2 CFR section 200.320. Non-federal entities must also ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes provisions required by 2 CFR section 200.326. These provisions are described in Appendix II to 2 CRF Part 200, “Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards”. In addition, per the Uniform Guidance CFR 200.303, nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Condition: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Context: During our testing of procurement for the Research and Development Cluster, we noted that the Organization did not provide adequate documentation of price or rate quotations from a qualified number of sources for 3 of 40 items tested that met the small purchase threshold. For an additional 4 of the 40 items that met the small purchase threshold and were single sourced, the Organization could not provide adequate documentation of the sole source justification being documented prior to the purchase being made. The sample was not statistically valid. During our testing of procurement for Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds ALN 21.027, we noted that 3 of the 3 contracts entered into did not include the proper contract flow-down provisions. Additionally, 2 of the 3 contracts that met the small purchase threshold and were sole sourced did not include adequate documentation of sole source justification prior to the purchase. Cause: The Organization did not properly identify certain purchase orders or other contracts as federal award transactions subject to procurement regulations. Effect: Internal controls were not properly implemented to reduce the risk of noncompliance and the Organization was not in compliance with Federal procurement requirements.Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management review internal controls over identification of federal contracts for adequacy and ensure internal controls over the procurement process are properly implemented. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding and the auditors’ recommendation. See Corrective Action Plan at the end of the report.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2023-003 – Procurement Non-Compliance (Material Weakness) Federal Program Title: U.S. Department of Treasury – ALN 21.027, Covid-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF), and Research and Development Cluster Assistance Listing Number: Various Action taken in response to finding: We have taken steps to identify all active federal awards that are subject to Federal procurement requirements under 2 CFR Part 200; these actions will ensure that all purchase orders and other subcontract arrangements under existing federal awards are subject to our purchasing system policies and procedures for Federal awards. Southern Research’s existing purchasing policies and procedures for Federal awards were reviewed and deemed acceptable in 2017 by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) Huntsville, AL. Contracts appropriately classified as Federal awards will be subject to purchasing policies and procedures that are compliant with Federal regulations. As part of the business process review, we will implement processes to ensure that all new Federal awards are classified correctly, and that Southern Research’s Federal purchasing system policies and procedures are applied to all Federal awards. Name of Person Responsible for the Corrective Action Plan: David A. Rutledge, Sr. Advisor - Finance Planned Completion Date for Corrective Action Plan: We anticipate that new process recommendations from the business process review related to purchasing will be implemented no later than December 31, 2024.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2022-12-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$21,593,077 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 20, 2023 — management decision was due March 20, 2024.

FY 2021-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$39,475,884 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 28, 2022 — management decision was due March 28, 2023.

FY 2021-01-01

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$46,213,717 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 21, 2021 — management decision was due May 21, 2022.

FY 2019-12-27

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$45,036,902 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2020 — management decision was due March 29, 2021.

FY 2018-12-28

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$44,481,761 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2019 — management decision was due March 29, 2020.

FY 2017-12-29

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$45,142,491 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2018 — management decision was due March 30, 2019.

2017-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2016-12-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$44,615,933 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2017 — management decision was due March 29, 2018.

2016-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2016-01-01

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$41,741,240 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2016 — management decision was due March 29, 2017.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Alabama

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.