EIN: 626017543
UEI: PVL9PALNAVD7
Audited by: Smith Marion & Co
Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 7, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on June 11, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 11, 2026 (90 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on June 20, 2025 — management decision was due December 20, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on June 10, 2024 — management decision was due December 10, 2024.
2023-001 HUD 50558 Rent Amount Not Agreeing to Rental Register Criteria "The PHA must report a monthly tenant rent amount on behalf of the family that corresponds with the amount on line 12u of the HUD-50058. This rent amount must be reflected on the rent register and amount collected each month. (24 CFR section 982.158 and 24 CFR part 982, subpart K). " Condition During our audit, we noticed on four (4) different occasions that the monthly family rent did not agree with what was reported on the 50058 submitted to HUD. Context "The Authority has 315 public housing units in fiscal year under examination . Of these we reviewed 40 individual 50058 HUD forms , and found four (4) instances of noncompliance for reporting flat rent amounts to HUD. " Cause The staff did not know how to make the 50058 submit flat rate amounts to HUD and manually updated the rent register. Effect The 50058 reported higher family rents to HUD then was actual charged and collected by the PHA. Ultimately the tenant was charged and paid correct flat rent, the software reported income based rent to HUD. Recommendations Staff have already corrected the issue after fiscal year end and are also in process of changing softwares to help resolve these types of issues. Management Views Management agrees.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2023-001 HUD 50558 Rent Amount Not Agreeing to Rental Register Criteria "The PHA must report a monthly tenant rent amount on behalf of the family that corresponds with the amount on line 12u of the HUD-50058. This rent amount must be reflected on the rent register and amount collected each month. (24 CFR section 982.158 and 24 CFR part 982, subpart K). " Condition During our audit, we noticed on four (4) different occasions that the monthly family rent did not agree with what was reported on the 50058 submitted to HUD. Context "The Authority has 315 public housing units in fiscal year under examination . Of these we reviewed 40 individual 50058 HUD forms , and found four (4) instances of noncompliance for reporting flat rent amounts to HUD. " Cause The staff did not know how to make the 50058 submit flat rate amounts to HUD and manually updated the rent register. Effect The 50058 reported higher family rents to HUD then was actual charged and collected by the PHA. Ultimately the tenant was charged and paid correct flat rent, the software reported income based rent to HUD. Recommendations Staff have already corrected the issue after fiscal year end and are also in process of changing softwares to help resolve these types of issues. Management Views Management agrees.
Date: May 31, 2024 Program: Public Housing Finding #: 2023-001 Condition: Discrepancy between actual monthly rent and amount reported on the 50058 for four tenants. Cause: Failure of staff to correct the 50058 to show the family was on Flat Rent. The rent was manually updated on the Rent Register, but the software did not register the adjustment on the 50058. Effect: The 50058 reported higher family rents to HUD than was actually charged and collected. The family was charged, and paid, the correct Flat Rent, but the software reported Income-based Rent to HUD. Resolution: Crossville Housing Authority staff corrected the problem immediately by working with the software provider.
FAC accepted this audit on June 13, 2023 — management decision was due December 13, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on August 29, 2022 — management decision was due March 1, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on July 13, 2021 — management decision was due January 13, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on July 23, 2020 — management decision was due January 23, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on August 22, 2019 — management decision was due February 22, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on July 24, 2018 — management decision was due January 24, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on August 6, 2017 — management decision was due February 6, 2018.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Tennessee →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
