EIN: 626010460
UEI: HAZNMW8ZJMJ8
Audited by: CRS CPAs
Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on April 20, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 20, 2026 (50 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on August 12, 2025 — management decision was due February 12, 2026.
FAC accepted this audit on July 17, 2024 — management decision was due January 17, 2025.
Davis Bacon Act prevailing wage requirements were not included in the contract or discussed with the contractor and Davis Bacon Act record retention requirements were not followed during the duration of the contruction project (significant deficiency and noncompliance). ALN Titlte and number: Education Stabilization Fund #84.425. Name of the Federal Agency: US Department of Education. Internal Control over Compliance: Auditee responsibilities. Condition and Context: The District did not discuss the need to meet the Davis Bacon Act prevailing wage requirements with the roof replacement contractor before requesting bids or signing a contract. The District also did not receive wage reports during the duration of the project and in turn, did not ensure that the contractor was in compliance with the Davis Bacon Act for prevailing wage rates paid to employees that worked on the roof replacement project prior to completion. The oversight was recognized prior to reimbursement and they took action to try to remedy the noncompliance by requesting the missing documentation after the fact. Criteria: Per the 2023 compliance supplement, recipients and subrecipients that use the ESF funds for minor remodeling, renovation or construction contracts that are over $2,000and use laborers and mechanics must meet the Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements. Cause: The District had not implemented any controls or processes to ensure compliance with this requirement prior to executing contracts. Effect: Non-compliance with the Uniform Guidance for the Federal grant funding received. And this non-compliance could have led to additional funds being needed to compensate for a lower than prevainling wage rate paid to the Contrator's employees or it could have led to disallowed costs and a resulting repayment of federal grant funds received. Questioned Cost: Unknown. Repeated Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District make the Davis Bacon Act pevailing wage requirements known as a requirement to contractors before accepting bids on projects in the future. We also recommend that the District make sure the contract ageement for the project includes a requirement for the contractor to comply with the Davis Bacon Act regarding prevailing wage rates. And we recommend the District receive weekly wage reports for the duration of the project and compare the wages paid with the prevailing wage rayes to ensure compliance with the Davis Bacon Act. Respnse: For any construction or building improvements requiring the use of contractors in the future, management will discuss adherence to the Davis Bacon Act regarding prevailing wages with the contractors and obtain documentation from the contractors demonstrating compliance with the Act.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Davis Bacon Act prevailing wage requirements were not included in the contract or discussed with the contractor and Davis Bacon Act record retention requirements were not followed during the duration of the contruction project (significant deficiency and noncompliance). ALN Titlte and number: Education Stabilization Fund #84.425. Name of the Federal Agency: US Department of Education. Internal Control over Compliance: Auditee responsibilities. Condition and Context: The District did not discuss the need to meet the Davis Bacon Act prevailing wage requirements with the roof replacement contractor before requesting bids or signing a contract. The District also did not receive wage reports during the duration of the project and in turn, did not ensure that the contractor was in compliance with the Davis Bacon Act for prevailing wage rates paid to employees that worked on the roof replacement project prior to completion. The oversight was recognized prior to reimbursement and they took action to try to remedy the noncompliance by requesting the missing documentation after the fact. Criteria: Per the 2023 compliance supplement, recipients and subrecipients that use the ESF funds for minor remodeling, renovation or construction contracts that are over $2,000and use laborers and mechanics must meet the Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements. Cause: The District had not implemented any controls or processes to ensure compliance with this requirement prior to executing contracts. Effect: Non-compliance with the Uniform Guidance for the Federal grant funding received. And this non-compliance could have led to additional funds being needed to compensate for a lower than prevainling wage rate paid to the Contrator's employees or it could have led to disallowed costs and a resulting repayment of federal grant funds received. Questioned Cost: Unknown. Repeated Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District make the Davis Bacon Act pevailing wage requirements known as a requirement to contractors before accepting bids on projects in the future. We also recommend that the District make sure the contract ageement for the project includes a requirement for the contractor to comply with the Davis Bacon Act regarding prevailing wage rates. And we recommend the District receive weekly wage reports for the duration of the project and compare the wages paid with the prevailing wage rayes to ensure compliance with the Davis Bacon Act. Respnse: For any construction or building improvements requiring the use of contractors in the future, management will discuss adherence to the Davis Bacon Act regarding prevailing wages with the contractors and obtain documentation from the contractors demonstrating compliance with the Act.
For any construction or building improvements requiring the use of contractors in the future, management will discuss adherence to the Davis Bacon Act regarding prevailing wages with the contractors and obtain documentation from the contractors demonstrating compliance with the Act.
FAC accepted this audit on February 16, 2024 — management decision was due August 16, 2024.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Tennessee →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.