← Back to home

BLOOMINGDALE UTILITY DISTRICT OF SULLIVAN COUNTYLocal Government

EIN: 626009161

UEI: J8TMALMSJFK7

Audited by: Brown, Edwards & Company, L.L.P.

Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

BLOOMINGDALE UTILITY DISTRICT OF SULLIVAN COUNTY3 audit years4 findings1 repeat
3
Audit Years
4
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$955.9K
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$955,911 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on February 12, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 12, 2026 (21 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2025-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
OTHER MATTERS

2025-003: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund – AL #21.027, Uniform Guidance Procurement Documentation Condition The Utility does not have written procurement policies that fully align with requirements in the Uniform Guidance. Criteria In December 2018, the sections of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) covering procurement became effective after a three-year grace period on the implementation date. The Uniform Guidance requires entities to have written policies and procedures in place covering most types of procurement, as well as related matters such as conflicts of interest, avoidance of geographical preferences, bidding thresholds, required contract language, and others. Cause The Utility is new to this type of funding and, while having various components of policies in place, has not yet adopted a complete policy. Effect Procurement procedures may not be conducted in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Recommendation The Utility should revise procurement procedures to more closely align with Uniform Guidance requirements. View of Responsible Officials The Utility will review and write a more detailed version of procurement policies to ensure complete and continuous compliance with the requirement in the Uniform Guidance.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2025-003: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund – AL #21.027, Uniform Guidance Procurement Documentation Condition The Utility does not have written procurement policies that fully align with requirements in the Uniform Guidance. Criteria In December 2018, the sections of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) covering procurement became effective after a three-year grace period on the implementation date. The Uniform Guidance requires entities to have written policies and procedures in place covering most types of procurement, as well as related matters such as conflicts of interest, avoidance of geographical preferences, bidding thresholds, required contract language, and others. Cause The Utility is new to this type of funding and, while having various components of policies in place, has not yet adopted a complete policy. Effect Procurement procedures may not be conducted in accordance with Uniform Guidance requirements. Recommendation The Utility should revise procurement procedures to more closely align with Uniform Guidance requirements. View of Responsible Officials The Utility will review and write a more detailed version of procurement policies to ensure complete and continuous compliance with the requirement in the Uniform Guidance.

Corrective Action Plan

The Utility will review and write a more detailed version of procurement policies to ensure complete and continuous compliance with the requirement in the Uniform Guidance

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2017-06-30

$1,017,018 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 5, 2018 — management decision was due August 5, 2018.

2016-003
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
REPEAT OF 2016-003OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-003

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →

FY 2016-06-30

$1,005,974 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 12, 2017 — management decision was due September 12, 2017.

2016-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2016-002
Special Tests & Provisions
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Tennessee

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.