← Back to home

CITY OF DAYTON, TENNESSEELocal Government

EIN: 626000278

UEI: GKQGENLU97U5

Audited by: NEAL, SCOUTEN & MCCONNELL, P.C.

Oversight agency: 11 [Department of Commerce]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

CITY OF DAYTON, TENNESSEE8 audit years14 findings13 repeat
8
Audit Years
14
Total Findings
13
Repeat Findings
$18.3M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2023)

FY 2023-06-30

$18,279,681 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on September 3, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 3, 2026 (185 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2023-001
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2022-001

Inadequate controls over preparation of financial statements

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Inadequate controls over preparation of financial statements

Corrective Action Plan

The City feels we meet our internal needs and it is not cost beneficial to hire a third party to prepare the financial statements.

Prior Finding References

2022-001

About Reporting →
2023-003
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2022-003

Improper controls over grant transactions

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Improper controls over grant transactions

Corrective Action Plan

The City provides the external auditors the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards annually. Workpapers within each audit file have an account analysis which list the revenue and expense account numbers and balances to the general ledger and federal grant expenses spreadsheet. The City was delayed in balancing one grant due to limited information provided on the recalculation of funding, this has since been received. The City will ensure all information is completed and balance with the closing of the fiscal year.

Prior Finding References

2022-003

About Reporting →

FY 2022-06-30

$4,019,273 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2023 — management decision was due September 30, 2023.

2022-001
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2021-001

The City currently does not prepare financial statements under generally accepted accounting principles. The external auditors prepare the statements and disclosures and management approves and takes responsibility for the statements after they are prepared. Criteria: Accounting standards dictate that management is responsible for preparation of the financial statements. An audit of the financial statements of an organization requires the evaluation of the internal control system?s design of controls in generating and overseeing of the financial statements to be audited. The organization must have the ability to prepare and evaluate the financial statements? format, content, and disclosures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and recognize any material items missing in the financial statements through the organization?s control system. This is true whether the organization prepares the financial statements or not. These controls can be established or achieved by use of a third party organization or internally, but external auditors are never considered a control element. Cause: The City believes its current reporting meets all of the City?s internal needs. While management knows their responsibility for understanding and presenting the annual financial statements, they do not believe it is currently cost beneficial to design and/or strengthen controls over the accounting departments financial reporting process. Effect: The City does not have proper controls over financial statements preparation. Recommendation: We recommend the City continue to monitor the need, costs, and benefits of developing a control structure to oversee the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Management Response: The City feels we meet our internal needs and it is not cost beneficial to hire a third party to prepare the financial statements.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-001: Inadequate Controls over Preparation of Financial Statements Condition: The City currently does not prepare financial statements under generally accepted accounting principles. The external auditors prepare the statements and disclosures and management approves and takes responsibility for the statements after they are prepared. Criteria: Accounting standards dictate that management is responsible for preparation of the financial statements. An audit of the financial statements of an organization requires the evaluation of the internal control system?s design of controls in generating and overseeing of the financial statements to be audited. The organization must have the ability to prepare and evaluate the financial statements? format, content, and disclosures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and recognize any material items missing in the financial statements through the organization?s control system. This is true whether the organization prepares the financial statements or not. These controls can be established or achieved by use of a third party organization or internally, but external auditors are never considered a control element. Cause: The City believes its current reporting meets all of the City?s internal needs. While management knows their responsibility for understanding and presenting the annual financial statements, they do not believe it is currently cost beneficial to design and/or strengthen controls over the accounting departments financial reporting process. Effect: The City does not have proper controls over financial statements preparation. Recommendation: We recommend the City continue to monitor the need, costs, and benefits of developing a control structure to oversee the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Management Response: The City feels we meet our internal needs and it is not cost beneficial to hire a third party to prepare the financial statements.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-001: Inadequate Controls over Preparation of Financial Statements Condition: The City currently does not prepare financial statements under generally accepted accounting principles. The external auditors prepare the statements and disclosures and management approves and takes responsibility for the statements after they are prepared. Criteria: Accounting standards dictate that management is responsible for preparation of the financial statements. An audit of the financial statements of an organization requires the evaluation of the internal control system?s design of controls in generating and overseeing of the financial statements to be audited. The organization must have the ability to prepare and evaluate the financial statements? format, content, and disclosures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and recognize any material items missing in the financial statements through the organization?s control system. This is true whether the organization prepares the financial statements or not. These controls can be established or achieved by use of a third party organization or internally, but external auditors are never considered a control element. Cause: The City believes its current reporting meets all of the City?s internal needs. While management knows their responsibility for understanding and presenting the annual financial statements, they do not believe it is currently cost beneficial to design and/or strengthen controls over the accounting departments financial reporting process. Effect: The City does not have proper controls over financial statements preparation. Recommendation: We recommend the City continue to monitor the need, costs, and benefits of developing a control structure to oversee the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Management Response: The City feels we meet our internal needs and it is not cost beneficial to hire a third party to prepare the financial statements.

Prior Finding References

2021-001

About Reporting →
2022-005
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2021-005

The City does not maintain grant files in a systematic manner to identify grant activity within the City?s General Fund, Water and Sewer Fund, Electric Fund, or Sanitation funds. Grant files did not include a reconciliation of grant revenue, expenses, or related deposit and retainage accounts to the general ledger or to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards. This weakness in the current system resulted in grants not identified initially, necessitating numerous revisions and corrections to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards regarding specific identification and names of grants with the associated Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number, pass-through number and placement of the grant as a Federal or State grant. Ultimately, City personnel responsible for preparation did not adequately prepare the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that systematic proper supporting documentation be maintained for grant activity. The Uniform Guidance also dictates that the City is responsible for preparing the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards. Cause: Controls do not exist which require all grant information to be documented, reconciled and maintained in an orderly fashion to support grant activity. Effect: Grants could be improperly reported without proper controls. In addition, compliance issues could arise due to lack of controls. Recommendation: We recommend proper controls be established for gathering, naming, identifying, reconciling and maintaining grant documentation. This documentation should be the basis for preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards and support all aspects of grant reconciliation, administration and compliance. Management Response: The current process for grant controls is being re-evalutated to develop stronger controls for gathering, naming, identifying, reconciling and maintaining all grant documents.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-005: Improper Controls over Grant Transactions Condition: The City does not maintain grant files in a systematic manner to identify grant activity within the City?s General Fund, Water and Sewer Fund, Electric Fund, or Sanitation funds. Grant files did not include a reconciliation of grant revenue, expenses, or related deposit and retainage accounts to the general ledger or to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards. This weakness in the current system resulted in grants not identified initially, necessitating numerous revisions and corrections to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards regarding specific identification and names of grants with the associated Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number, pass-through number and placement of the grant as a Federal or State grant. Ultimately, City personnel responsible for preparation did not adequately prepare the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that systematic proper supporting documentation be maintained for grant activity. The Uniform Guidance also dictates that the City is responsible for preparing the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards. Cause: Controls do not exist which require all grant information to be documented, reconciled and maintained in an orderly fashion to support grant activity. Effect: Grants could be improperly reported without proper controls. In addition, compliance issues could arise due to lack of controls. Recommendation: We recommend proper controls be established for gathering, naming, identifying, reconciling and maintaining grant documentation. This documentation should be the basis for preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards and support all aspects of grant reconciliation, administration and compliance. Management Response: The current process for grant controls is being re-evalutated to develop stronger controls for gathering, naming, identifying, reconciling and maintaining all grant documents.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-005: Improper Controls over Grant Transactions Condition: The City does not maintain grant files in a systematic manner to identify grant activity within the City?s General Fund, Water and Sewer Fund, Electric Fund, or Sanitation funds. Grant files did not include a reconciliation of grant revenue, expenses, or related deposit and retainage accounts to the general ledger or to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards. This weakness in the current system resulted in grants not identified initially, necessitating numerous revisions and corrections to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards regarding specific identification and names of grants with the associated Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number, pass-through number and placement of the grant as a Federal or State grant. Ultimately, City personnel responsible for preparation did not adequately prepare the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that systematic proper supporting documentation be maintained for grant activity. The Uniform Guidance also dictates that the City is responsible for preparing the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards. Cause: Controls do not exist which require all grant information to be documented, reconciled and maintained in an orderly fashion to support grant activity. Effect: Grants could be improperly reported without proper controls. In addition, compliance issues could arise due to lack of controls. Recommendation: We recommend proper controls be established for gathering, naming, identifying, reconciling and maintaining grant documentation. This documentation should be the basis for preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards and support all aspects of grant reconciliation, administration and compliance. Management Response: The current process for grant controls is being re-evalutated to develop stronger controls for gathering, naming, identifying, reconciling and maintaining all grant documents.

Prior Finding References

2021-005

About Reporting →

FY 2021-06-30

$3,434,842 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2022 — management decision was due September 30, 2022.

2021-001
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2020-001

The City currently does not prepare financial statements under generally accepted accounting principles. The external auditors prepare the statements and disclosures and management approves and takes responsibility for the statements after they are prepared. Criteria: Accounting standards dictate that management is responsible for preparation of the financial statements. An audit of the financial statements of an organization requires the evaluation of the internal control system?s design of controls in generating and overseeing of the financial statements to be audited. The organization must have the ability to prepare and evaluate the financial statements? format, content, and disclosures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and recognize any material items missing in the statement through the organization?s control system. This is true whether the organization prepares the financial statements or not. These controls can be established or achieved by use of a third party organization or internally, but external auditors are never considered a control element. Cause: The City believes its current reporting meets all of the City?s internal needs. While management knows their responsibility for understanding and presenting the annual financial statements, they do not believe it is currently cost beneficial to design and/or strengthen controls over the accounting departments financial reporting process. Effect: The City does not have proper controls over financial statements preparation. Recommendation: We recommend the City continue to monitor the need, costs, and benefits of developing a control structure to oversee the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2021-001: Inadequate Controls over Preparation of Financial Statements Condition: The City currently does not prepare financial statements under generally accepted accounting principles. The external auditors prepare the statements and disclosures and management approves and takes responsibility for the statements after they are prepared. Criteria: Accounting standards dictate that management is responsible for preparation of the financial statements. An audit of the financial statements of an organization requires the evaluation of the internal control system?s design of controls in generating and overseeing of the financial statements to be audited. The organization must have the ability to prepare and evaluate the financial statements? format, content, and disclosures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and recognize any material items missing in the statement through the organization?s control system. This is true whether the organization prepares the financial statements or not. These controls can be established or achieved by use of a third party organization or internally, but external auditors are never considered a control element. Cause: The City believes its current reporting meets all of the City?s internal needs. While management knows their responsibility for understanding and presenting the annual financial statements, they do not believe it is currently cost beneficial to design and/or strengthen controls over the accounting departments financial reporting process. Effect: The City does not have proper controls over financial statements preparation. Recommendation: We recommend the City continue to monitor the need, costs, and benefits of developing a control structure to oversee the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Corrective Action Plan

2021-001: Accounts Receivable in Water & Sewer, Electric and Sanitation Funds The City feels we meet our internal needs and it is not cost beneficial to hire a third party to prepare the financial statements.

Prior Finding References

2020-001

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2021-005
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2020-005

The City does not maintain grant files in a systematic manner to identify grant activity within the City?s General Fund, Water & Sewer Fund and Electric Funds. Grant files did not include a reconciliation of grant revenue, expenses, or related deposit and retainage accounts to indicate amounts are reconciled to the general ledger or to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards. This weakness in the current system resulted in grants not being identified initially, necessitating revisions to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards, which further resulted in changes to the testing plan late in the audit process once all grants were identified. Ultimately, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards was not prepared by the City personnel responsible for preparation. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that systematic proper supporting documentation be maintained for grant activity. The Uniform Guidance also dictates that the City is responsible for preparing the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards. Cause: Controls do not exist which require all grant information to be documented, reconciled and maintained in an orderly fashion to support grant activity. Effect: Grants could be improperly reported without proper controls. In addition, compliance issues could arise due to lack of controls. Recommendation: We recommend proper controls be established for gathering, reconciling and maintaining grant documentation and the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2021-005: Improper Controls over Grant Transactions Condition: The City does not maintain grant files in a systematic manner to identify grant activity within the City?s General Fund, Water & Sewer Fund and Electric Funds. Grant files did not include a reconciliation of grant revenue, expenses, or related deposit and retainage accounts to indicate amounts are reconciled to the general ledger or to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards. This weakness in the current system resulted in grants not being identified initially, necessitating revisions to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards, which further resulted in changes to the testing plan late in the audit process once all grants were identified. Ultimately, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards was not prepared by the City personnel responsible for preparation. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that systematic proper supporting documentation be maintained for grant activity. The Uniform Guidance also dictates that the City is responsible for preparing the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards. Cause: Controls do not exist which require all grant information to be documented, reconciled and maintained in an orderly fashion to support grant activity. Effect: Grants could be improperly reported without proper controls. In addition, compliance issues could arise due to lack of controls. Recommendation: We recommend proper controls be established for gathering, reconciling and maintaining grant documentation and the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards.

Corrective Action Plan

2021-005: Improper Controls Over Grant Transactions We have established grant files with all documentation pertaining to the grant expenses and reimbursements. The City Recorder prepares the Schedule of Federal and State Awards.

Prior Finding References

2020-005

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2020-06-30

$1,571,357 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2021 — management decision was due September 30, 2021.

2020-001
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2019-001

The City currently does not prepare financial statements under generally accepted accounting principles. The external auditors prepare the statements and disclosures and management approves and takes responsibility for the statements after they are prepared. Criteria: Accounting standards dictate that management is responsible for preparation of the financial statements. An audit of the financial statements of an organization requires the evaluation of the internal control system?s design of controls in generating and overseeing of the financial statements to be audited. The organization must have the ability to prepare and evaluate the financial statements? format, content, and disclosures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and recognize any material items missing in the statement through the organization?s control system. This is true whether the organization prepares the financial statements or not. These controls can be established or achieved by use of a third party organization or internally, but external auditors are never considered a control element. Cause: The City believes its current reporting meets all of the City?s internal needs. While management knows their responsibility for understanding and presenting the annual financial statements, they do not believe it is currently cost beneficial to design and/or strengthen controls over the accounting departments financial reporting process. Effect: The City does not have proper controls over financial statements preparation. Recommendation: We recommend the City continue to monitor the need, costs, and benefits of developing a control structure to oversee the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2020-001: Inadequate Controls over Preparation of Financial Statements Condition: The City currently does not prepare financial statements under generally accepted accounting principles. The external auditors prepare the statements and disclosures and management approves and takes responsibility for the statements after they are prepared. Criteria: Accounting standards dictate that management is responsible for preparation of the financial statements. An audit of the financial statements of an organization requires the evaluation of the internal control system?s design of controls in generating and overseeing of the financial statements to be audited. The organization must have the ability to prepare and evaluate the financial statements? format, content, and disclosures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and recognize any material items missing in the statement through the organization?s control system. This is true whether the organization prepares the financial statements or not. These controls can be established or achieved by use of a third party organization or internally, but external auditors are never considered a control element. Cause: The City believes its current reporting meets all of the City?s internal needs. While management knows their responsibility for understanding and presenting the annual financial statements, they do not believe it is currently cost beneficial to design and/or strengthen controls over the accounting departments financial reporting process. Effect: The City does not have proper controls over financial statements preparation. Recommendation: We recommend the City continue to monitor the need, costs, and benefits of developing a control structure to oversee the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Corrective Action Plan

Action Taken: The City feels they meet their internal needs and it is not cost beneficial to hire a third party to prepare the financial statements. We feel the reporting by our accounting department meets all our internal needs. We know our responsibility for understanding and presenting the annual financial statements. We don?t believe it is currently cost beneficial to hire a third party to design our financial reporting process.

Prior Finding References

2019-001

About Reporting →
2020-005
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2019-005

The City does not maintain grant files in a systematic manner to appropriately identify grant activity. Grant files did not include a reconciliation of grant revenue, expenses, or related deposit accounts to indicate amounts are reconciled to the general ledger or to the Schedule of Federal and State Awards. The City did prepare the Schedule of Federal and State Awards, however it was incomplete, as all grants were not listed with identifying grant numbers. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that systematic proper supporting documentation be maintained for grant activity. The Uniform Guidance also dictates that the City is responsible for preparing the Schedule of Federal and State Awards. Cause: Controls do not exist which require all grant information to be documented and maintained in an orderly fashion to support grant activity. Effect: Grants could be improperly reported or not reported without proper controls. In addition, compliance issues could arise due to lack of controls. Recommendation: We recommend proper controls be established for gathering and maintaining grant documentation and the preparation of the Schedule of Federal and State Awards.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2020-005: Improper Controls over Grant Transactions Condition: The City does not maintain grant files in a systematic manner to appropriately identify grant activity. Grant files did not include a reconciliation of grant revenue, expenses, or related deposit accounts to indicate amounts are reconciled to the general ledger or to the Schedule of Federal and State Awards. The City did prepare the Schedule of Federal and State Awards, however it was incomplete, as all grants were not listed with identifying grant numbers. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that systematic proper supporting documentation be maintained for grant activity. The Uniform Guidance also dictates that the City is responsible for preparing the Schedule of Federal and State Awards. Cause: Controls do not exist which require all grant information to be documented and maintained in an orderly fashion to support grant activity. Effect: Grants could be improperly reported or not reported without proper controls. In addition, compliance issues could arise due to lack of controls. Recommendation: We recommend proper controls be established for gathering and maintaining grant documentation and the preparation of the Schedule of Federal and State Awards.

Corrective Action Plan

Action Taken: The responsibility of grants was assigned to the Finance Department in May 2020. The City Recorder will oversee and maintain grant documentation.

Prior Finding References

2019-005

About Reporting →

FY 2019-06-30

$2,573,412 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 17, 2020 — management decision was due November 17, 2020.

2019-001
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2018-001

The City currently does not prepare financial statements under generally accepted accounting principles. The external auditors prepare the statements and disclosures and management approves and takes responsibility for the statements after they are prepared. Criteria: Accounting standards dictate that management is responsible for preparation of the financial statements. An audit of the financial statements of an organization requires the evaluation of the internal control system?s design of controls in generating and overseeing of the financial statements to be audited. The organization must have the ability to prepare and evaluate the financial statements? format, content, and disclosures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and recognize any material items missing in the statement through the organization?s control system. This is true whether the organization prepares the financial statements or not. These controls can be established or achieved by use of a third party organization or internally, but external auditors are never considered a control element. Cause: The City believes its current reporting meets all of the City?s internal needs. While management knows their responsibility for understanding and presenting the annual financial statements, they do not believe it is currently cost beneficial to design and/or strengthen controls over the accounting departments financial reporting process. Effect: The City does not have proper controls over financial statements preparation. Recommendation: We recommend the City continue to monitor the need, costs, and benefits of developing a control structure to oversee the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-001: Inadequate Controls over Preparation of Financial Statements Condition: The City currently does not prepare financial statements under generally accepted accounting principles. The external auditors prepare the statements and disclosures and management approves and takes responsibility for the statements after they are prepared. Criteria: Accounting standards dictate that management is responsible for preparation of the financial statements. An audit of the financial statements of an organization requires the evaluation of the internal control system?s design of controls in generating and overseeing of the financial statements to be audited. The organization must have the ability to prepare and evaluate the financial statements? format, content, and disclosures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and recognize any material items missing in the statement through the organization?s control system. This is true whether the organization prepares the financial statements or not. These controls can be established or achieved by use of a third party organization or internally, but external auditors are never considered a control element. Cause: The City believes its current reporting meets all of the City?s internal needs. While management knows their responsibility for understanding and presenting the annual financial statements, they do not believe it is currently cost beneficial to design and/or strengthen controls over the accounting departments financial reporting process. Effect: The City does not have proper controls over financial statements preparation. Recommendation: We recommend the City continue to monitor the need, costs, and benefits of developing a control structure to oversee the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Corrective Action Plan

Management Response: The City feels we meet our internal needs and it is not cost beneficial to hire a third party to prepare the financial statements.

Prior Finding References

2018-001

About Reporting →
2019-005
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2018-007

The City did not maintain grant files in a systematic manner to appropriately identify grant activity. Various grants are handled by two employees within the City in addition to the Police department handling their grants. The City does not prepare the Schedule of Federal and State Awards. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that systematic proper supporting documentation be maintained for grant activity. The Uniform Guidance also dictates that the City is responsible for preparing the Schedule of Federal and State Awards. Cause: Controls do not exist which require all grant information to be documented and maintained in an orderly fashion to support grant activity. Effect: Grants could be improperly reported or not reported without proper controls. In addition, compliance issues could arise due to lack of controls. Recommendation: We recommend proper controls be established for gathering and maintaining grant documentation and the preparation of the Schedule of Federal and State Awards.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-005: Improper Controls over Grant Transactions Condition: The City did not maintain grant files in a systematic manner to appropriately identify grant activity. Various grants are handled by two employees within the City in addition to the Police department handling their grants. The City does not prepare the Schedule of Federal and State Awards. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that systematic proper supporting documentation be maintained for grant activity. The Uniform Guidance also dictates that the City is responsible for preparing the Schedule of Federal and State Awards. Cause: Controls do not exist which require all grant information to be documented and maintained in an orderly fashion to support grant activity. Effect: Grants could be improperly reported or not reported without proper controls. In addition, compliance issues could arise due to lack of controls. Recommendation: We recommend proper controls be established for gathering and maintaining grant documentation and the preparation of the Schedule of Federal and State Awards.

Corrective Action Plan

Management Response: The responsibility of grants has been assigned to the Finance Department. The City Recorder will oversee and maintain grant documentation.

Prior Finding References

2018-007

About Reporting →

FY 2018-06-30

$1,236,716 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2019 — management decision was due September 27, 2019.

2018-001
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2017-001

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-001

About Reporting →
2018-007
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →

FY 2017-06-30

$1,605,845 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 8, 2018 — management decision was due September 8, 2018.

2017-001
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2016-001

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-001

About Reporting →

FY 2016-06-30

$1,104,651 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2017 — management decision was due September 27, 2017.

2016-001
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2015-001

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-001

About Reporting →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Tennessee

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.