EIN: 626000278
UEI: GKQGENLU97U5
Audited by: NEAL, SCOUTEN & MCCONNELL, P.C.
Oversight agency: 11 [Department of Commerce]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on September 3, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 3, 2026 (185 days ago).
What is a management decision? →Inadequate controls over preparation of financial statements
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Inadequate controls over preparation of financial statements
The City feels we meet our internal needs and it is not cost beneficial to hire a third party to prepare the financial statements.
2022-001
Improper controls over grant transactions
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Improper controls over grant transactions
The City provides the external auditors the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards annually. Workpapers within each audit file have an account analysis which list the revenue and expense account numbers and balances to the general ledger and federal grant expenses spreadsheet. The City was delayed in balancing one grant due to limited information provided on the recalculation of funding, this has since been received. The City will ensure all information is completed and balance with the closing of the fiscal year.
2022-003
FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2023 — management decision was due September 30, 2023.
The City currently does not prepare financial statements under generally accepted accounting principles. The external auditors prepare the statements and disclosures and management approves and takes responsibility for the statements after they are prepared. Criteria: Accounting standards dictate that management is responsible for preparation of the financial statements. An audit of the financial statements of an organization requires the evaluation of the internal control system?s design of controls in generating and overseeing of the financial statements to be audited. The organization must have the ability to prepare and evaluate the financial statements? format, content, and disclosures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and recognize any material items missing in the financial statements through the organization?s control system. This is true whether the organization prepares the financial statements or not. These controls can be established or achieved by use of a third party organization or internally, but external auditors are never considered a control element. Cause: The City believes its current reporting meets all of the City?s internal needs. While management knows their responsibility for understanding and presenting the annual financial statements, they do not believe it is currently cost beneficial to design and/or strengthen controls over the accounting departments financial reporting process. Effect: The City does not have proper controls over financial statements preparation. Recommendation: We recommend the City continue to monitor the need, costs, and benefits of developing a control structure to oversee the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Management Response: The City feels we meet our internal needs and it is not cost beneficial to hire a third party to prepare the financial statements.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2022-001: Inadequate Controls over Preparation of Financial Statements Condition: The City currently does not prepare financial statements under generally accepted accounting principles. The external auditors prepare the statements and disclosures and management approves and takes responsibility for the statements after they are prepared. Criteria: Accounting standards dictate that management is responsible for preparation of the financial statements. An audit of the financial statements of an organization requires the evaluation of the internal control system?s design of controls in generating and overseeing of the financial statements to be audited. The organization must have the ability to prepare and evaluate the financial statements? format, content, and disclosures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and recognize any material items missing in the financial statements through the organization?s control system. This is true whether the organization prepares the financial statements or not. These controls can be established or achieved by use of a third party organization or internally, but external auditors are never considered a control element. Cause: The City believes its current reporting meets all of the City?s internal needs. While management knows their responsibility for understanding and presenting the annual financial statements, they do not believe it is currently cost beneficial to design and/or strengthen controls over the accounting departments financial reporting process. Effect: The City does not have proper controls over financial statements preparation. Recommendation: We recommend the City continue to monitor the need, costs, and benefits of developing a control structure to oversee the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Management Response: The City feels we meet our internal needs and it is not cost beneficial to hire a third party to prepare the financial statements.
2022-001: Inadequate Controls over Preparation of Financial Statements Condition: The City currently does not prepare financial statements under generally accepted accounting principles. The external auditors prepare the statements and disclosures and management approves and takes responsibility for the statements after they are prepared. Criteria: Accounting standards dictate that management is responsible for preparation of the financial statements. An audit of the financial statements of an organization requires the evaluation of the internal control system?s design of controls in generating and overseeing of the financial statements to be audited. The organization must have the ability to prepare and evaluate the financial statements? format, content, and disclosures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and recognize any material items missing in the financial statements through the organization?s control system. This is true whether the organization prepares the financial statements or not. These controls can be established or achieved by use of a third party organization or internally, but external auditors are never considered a control element. Cause: The City believes its current reporting meets all of the City?s internal needs. While management knows their responsibility for understanding and presenting the annual financial statements, they do not believe it is currently cost beneficial to design and/or strengthen controls over the accounting departments financial reporting process. Effect: The City does not have proper controls over financial statements preparation. Recommendation: We recommend the City continue to monitor the need, costs, and benefits of developing a control structure to oversee the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Management Response: The City feels we meet our internal needs and it is not cost beneficial to hire a third party to prepare the financial statements.
2021-001
The City does not maintain grant files in a systematic manner to identify grant activity within the City?s General Fund, Water and Sewer Fund, Electric Fund, or Sanitation funds. Grant files did not include a reconciliation of grant revenue, expenses, or related deposit and retainage accounts to the general ledger or to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards. This weakness in the current system resulted in grants not identified initially, necessitating numerous revisions and corrections to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards regarding specific identification and names of grants with the associated Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number, pass-through number and placement of the grant as a Federal or State grant. Ultimately, City personnel responsible for preparation did not adequately prepare the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that systematic proper supporting documentation be maintained for grant activity. The Uniform Guidance also dictates that the City is responsible for preparing the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards. Cause: Controls do not exist which require all grant information to be documented, reconciled and maintained in an orderly fashion to support grant activity. Effect: Grants could be improperly reported without proper controls. In addition, compliance issues could arise due to lack of controls. Recommendation: We recommend proper controls be established for gathering, naming, identifying, reconciling and maintaining grant documentation. This documentation should be the basis for preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards and support all aspects of grant reconciliation, administration and compliance. Management Response: The current process for grant controls is being re-evalutated to develop stronger controls for gathering, naming, identifying, reconciling and maintaining all grant documents.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2022-005: Improper Controls over Grant Transactions Condition: The City does not maintain grant files in a systematic manner to identify grant activity within the City?s General Fund, Water and Sewer Fund, Electric Fund, or Sanitation funds. Grant files did not include a reconciliation of grant revenue, expenses, or related deposit and retainage accounts to the general ledger or to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards. This weakness in the current system resulted in grants not identified initially, necessitating numerous revisions and corrections to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards regarding specific identification and names of grants with the associated Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number, pass-through number and placement of the grant as a Federal or State grant. Ultimately, City personnel responsible for preparation did not adequately prepare the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that systematic proper supporting documentation be maintained for grant activity. The Uniform Guidance also dictates that the City is responsible for preparing the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards. Cause: Controls do not exist which require all grant information to be documented, reconciled and maintained in an orderly fashion to support grant activity. Effect: Grants could be improperly reported without proper controls. In addition, compliance issues could arise due to lack of controls. Recommendation: We recommend proper controls be established for gathering, naming, identifying, reconciling and maintaining grant documentation. This documentation should be the basis for preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards and support all aspects of grant reconciliation, administration and compliance. Management Response: The current process for grant controls is being re-evalutated to develop stronger controls for gathering, naming, identifying, reconciling and maintaining all grant documents.
2022-005: Improper Controls over Grant Transactions Condition: The City does not maintain grant files in a systematic manner to identify grant activity within the City?s General Fund, Water and Sewer Fund, Electric Fund, or Sanitation funds. Grant files did not include a reconciliation of grant revenue, expenses, or related deposit and retainage accounts to the general ledger or to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards. This weakness in the current system resulted in grants not identified initially, necessitating numerous revisions and corrections to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards regarding specific identification and names of grants with the associated Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number, pass-through number and placement of the grant as a Federal or State grant. Ultimately, City personnel responsible for preparation did not adequately prepare the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that systematic proper supporting documentation be maintained for grant activity. The Uniform Guidance also dictates that the City is responsible for preparing the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards. Cause: Controls do not exist which require all grant information to be documented, reconciled and maintained in an orderly fashion to support grant activity. Effect: Grants could be improperly reported without proper controls. In addition, compliance issues could arise due to lack of controls. Recommendation: We recommend proper controls be established for gathering, naming, identifying, reconciling and maintaining grant documentation. This documentation should be the basis for preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards and support all aspects of grant reconciliation, administration and compliance. Management Response: The current process for grant controls is being re-evalutated to develop stronger controls for gathering, naming, identifying, reconciling and maintaining all grant documents.
2021-005
FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2022 — management decision was due September 30, 2022.
The City currently does not prepare financial statements under generally accepted accounting principles. The external auditors prepare the statements and disclosures and management approves and takes responsibility for the statements after they are prepared. Criteria: Accounting standards dictate that management is responsible for preparation of the financial statements. An audit of the financial statements of an organization requires the evaluation of the internal control system?s design of controls in generating and overseeing of the financial statements to be audited. The organization must have the ability to prepare and evaluate the financial statements? format, content, and disclosures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and recognize any material items missing in the statement through the organization?s control system. This is true whether the organization prepares the financial statements or not. These controls can be established or achieved by use of a third party organization or internally, but external auditors are never considered a control element. Cause: The City believes its current reporting meets all of the City?s internal needs. While management knows their responsibility for understanding and presenting the annual financial statements, they do not believe it is currently cost beneficial to design and/or strengthen controls over the accounting departments financial reporting process. Effect: The City does not have proper controls over financial statements preparation. Recommendation: We recommend the City continue to monitor the need, costs, and benefits of developing a control structure to oversee the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2021-001: Inadequate Controls over Preparation of Financial Statements Condition: The City currently does not prepare financial statements under generally accepted accounting principles. The external auditors prepare the statements and disclosures and management approves and takes responsibility for the statements after they are prepared. Criteria: Accounting standards dictate that management is responsible for preparation of the financial statements. An audit of the financial statements of an organization requires the evaluation of the internal control system?s design of controls in generating and overseeing of the financial statements to be audited. The organization must have the ability to prepare and evaluate the financial statements? format, content, and disclosures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and recognize any material items missing in the statement through the organization?s control system. This is true whether the organization prepares the financial statements or not. These controls can be established or achieved by use of a third party organization or internally, but external auditors are never considered a control element. Cause: The City believes its current reporting meets all of the City?s internal needs. While management knows their responsibility for understanding and presenting the annual financial statements, they do not believe it is currently cost beneficial to design and/or strengthen controls over the accounting departments financial reporting process. Effect: The City does not have proper controls over financial statements preparation. Recommendation: We recommend the City continue to monitor the need, costs, and benefits of developing a control structure to oversee the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
2021-001: Accounts Receivable in Water & Sewer, Electric and Sanitation Funds The City feels we meet our internal needs and it is not cost beneficial to hire a third party to prepare the financial statements.
2020-001
The City does not maintain grant files in a systematic manner to identify grant activity within the City?s General Fund, Water & Sewer Fund and Electric Funds. Grant files did not include a reconciliation of grant revenue, expenses, or related deposit and retainage accounts to indicate amounts are reconciled to the general ledger or to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards. This weakness in the current system resulted in grants not being identified initially, necessitating revisions to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards, which further resulted in changes to the testing plan late in the audit process once all grants were identified. Ultimately, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards was not prepared by the City personnel responsible for preparation. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that systematic proper supporting documentation be maintained for grant activity. The Uniform Guidance also dictates that the City is responsible for preparing the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards. Cause: Controls do not exist which require all grant information to be documented, reconciled and maintained in an orderly fashion to support grant activity. Effect: Grants could be improperly reported without proper controls. In addition, compliance issues could arise due to lack of controls. Recommendation: We recommend proper controls be established for gathering, reconciling and maintaining grant documentation and the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2021-005: Improper Controls over Grant Transactions Condition: The City does not maintain grant files in a systematic manner to identify grant activity within the City?s General Fund, Water & Sewer Fund and Electric Funds. Grant files did not include a reconciliation of grant revenue, expenses, or related deposit and retainage accounts to indicate amounts are reconciled to the general ledger or to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards. This weakness in the current system resulted in grants not being identified initially, necessitating revisions to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards, which further resulted in changes to the testing plan late in the audit process once all grants were identified. Ultimately, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards was not prepared by the City personnel responsible for preparation. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that systematic proper supporting documentation be maintained for grant activity. The Uniform Guidance also dictates that the City is responsible for preparing the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards. Cause: Controls do not exist which require all grant information to be documented, reconciled and maintained in an orderly fashion to support grant activity. Effect: Grants could be improperly reported without proper controls. In addition, compliance issues could arise due to lack of controls. Recommendation: We recommend proper controls be established for gathering, reconciling and maintaining grant documentation and the preparation of the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards.
2021-005: Improper Controls Over Grant Transactions We have established grant files with all documentation pertaining to the grant expenses and reimbursements. The City Recorder prepares the Schedule of Federal and State Awards.
2020-005
FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2021 — management decision was due September 30, 2021.
The City currently does not prepare financial statements under generally accepted accounting principles. The external auditors prepare the statements and disclosures and management approves and takes responsibility for the statements after they are prepared. Criteria: Accounting standards dictate that management is responsible for preparation of the financial statements. An audit of the financial statements of an organization requires the evaluation of the internal control system?s design of controls in generating and overseeing of the financial statements to be audited. The organization must have the ability to prepare and evaluate the financial statements? format, content, and disclosures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and recognize any material items missing in the statement through the organization?s control system. This is true whether the organization prepares the financial statements or not. These controls can be established or achieved by use of a third party organization or internally, but external auditors are never considered a control element. Cause: The City believes its current reporting meets all of the City?s internal needs. While management knows their responsibility for understanding and presenting the annual financial statements, they do not believe it is currently cost beneficial to design and/or strengthen controls over the accounting departments financial reporting process. Effect: The City does not have proper controls over financial statements preparation. Recommendation: We recommend the City continue to monitor the need, costs, and benefits of developing a control structure to oversee the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2020-001: Inadequate Controls over Preparation of Financial Statements Condition: The City currently does not prepare financial statements under generally accepted accounting principles. The external auditors prepare the statements and disclosures and management approves and takes responsibility for the statements after they are prepared. Criteria: Accounting standards dictate that management is responsible for preparation of the financial statements. An audit of the financial statements of an organization requires the evaluation of the internal control system?s design of controls in generating and overseeing of the financial statements to be audited. The organization must have the ability to prepare and evaluate the financial statements? format, content, and disclosures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and recognize any material items missing in the statement through the organization?s control system. This is true whether the organization prepares the financial statements or not. These controls can be established or achieved by use of a third party organization or internally, but external auditors are never considered a control element. Cause: The City believes its current reporting meets all of the City?s internal needs. While management knows their responsibility for understanding and presenting the annual financial statements, they do not believe it is currently cost beneficial to design and/or strengthen controls over the accounting departments financial reporting process. Effect: The City does not have proper controls over financial statements preparation. Recommendation: We recommend the City continue to monitor the need, costs, and benefits of developing a control structure to oversee the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Action Taken: The City feels they meet their internal needs and it is not cost beneficial to hire a third party to prepare the financial statements. We feel the reporting by our accounting department meets all our internal needs. We know our responsibility for understanding and presenting the annual financial statements. We don?t believe it is currently cost beneficial to hire a third party to design our financial reporting process.
2019-001
The City does not maintain grant files in a systematic manner to appropriately identify grant activity. Grant files did not include a reconciliation of grant revenue, expenses, or related deposit accounts to indicate amounts are reconciled to the general ledger or to the Schedule of Federal and State Awards. The City did prepare the Schedule of Federal and State Awards, however it was incomplete, as all grants were not listed with identifying grant numbers. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that systematic proper supporting documentation be maintained for grant activity. The Uniform Guidance also dictates that the City is responsible for preparing the Schedule of Federal and State Awards. Cause: Controls do not exist which require all grant information to be documented and maintained in an orderly fashion to support grant activity. Effect: Grants could be improperly reported or not reported without proper controls. In addition, compliance issues could arise due to lack of controls. Recommendation: We recommend proper controls be established for gathering and maintaining grant documentation and the preparation of the Schedule of Federal and State Awards.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2020-005: Improper Controls over Grant Transactions Condition: The City does not maintain grant files in a systematic manner to appropriately identify grant activity. Grant files did not include a reconciliation of grant revenue, expenses, or related deposit accounts to indicate amounts are reconciled to the general ledger or to the Schedule of Federal and State Awards. The City did prepare the Schedule of Federal and State Awards, however it was incomplete, as all grants were not listed with identifying grant numbers. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that systematic proper supporting documentation be maintained for grant activity. The Uniform Guidance also dictates that the City is responsible for preparing the Schedule of Federal and State Awards. Cause: Controls do not exist which require all grant information to be documented and maintained in an orderly fashion to support grant activity. Effect: Grants could be improperly reported or not reported without proper controls. In addition, compliance issues could arise due to lack of controls. Recommendation: We recommend proper controls be established for gathering and maintaining grant documentation and the preparation of the Schedule of Federal and State Awards.
Action Taken: The responsibility of grants was assigned to the Finance Department in May 2020. The City Recorder will oversee and maintain grant documentation.
2019-005
FAC accepted this audit on May 17, 2020 — management decision was due November 17, 2020.
The City currently does not prepare financial statements under generally accepted accounting principles. The external auditors prepare the statements and disclosures and management approves and takes responsibility for the statements after they are prepared. Criteria: Accounting standards dictate that management is responsible for preparation of the financial statements. An audit of the financial statements of an organization requires the evaluation of the internal control system?s design of controls in generating and overseeing of the financial statements to be audited. The organization must have the ability to prepare and evaluate the financial statements? format, content, and disclosures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and recognize any material items missing in the statement through the organization?s control system. This is true whether the organization prepares the financial statements or not. These controls can be established or achieved by use of a third party organization or internally, but external auditors are never considered a control element. Cause: The City believes its current reporting meets all of the City?s internal needs. While management knows their responsibility for understanding and presenting the annual financial statements, they do not believe it is currently cost beneficial to design and/or strengthen controls over the accounting departments financial reporting process. Effect: The City does not have proper controls over financial statements preparation. Recommendation: We recommend the City continue to monitor the need, costs, and benefits of developing a control structure to oversee the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2019-001: Inadequate Controls over Preparation of Financial Statements Condition: The City currently does not prepare financial statements under generally accepted accounting principles. The external auditors prepare the statements and disclosures and management approves and takes responsibility for the statements after they are prepared. Criteria: Accounting standards dictate that management is responsible for preparation of the financial statements. An audit of the financial statements of an organization requires the evaluation of the internal control system?s design of controls in generating and overseeing of the financial statements to be audited. The organization must have the ability to prepare and evaluate the financial statements? format, content, and disclosures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and recognize any material items missing in the statement through the organization?s control system. This is true whether the organization prepares the financial statements or not. These controls can be established or achieved by use of a third party organization or internally, but external auditors are never considered a control element. Cause: The City believes its current reporting meets all of the City?s internal needs. While management knows their responsibility for understanding and presenting the annual financial statements, they do not believe it is currently cost beneficial to design and/or strengthen controls over the accounting departments financial reporting process. Effect: The City does not have proper controls over financial statements preparation. Recommendation: We recommend the City continue to monitor the need, costs, and benefits of developing a control structure to oversee the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Management Response: The City feels we meet our internal needs and it is not cost beneficial to hire a third party to prepare the financial statements.
2018-001
The City did not maintain grant files in a systematic manner to appropriately identify grant activity. Various grants are handled by two employees within the City in addition to the Police department handling their grants. The City does not prepare the Schedule of Federal and State Awards. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that systematic proper supporting documentation be maintained for grant activity. The Uniform Guidance also dictates that the City is responsible for preparing the Schedule of Federal and State Awards. Cause: Controls do not exist which require all grant information to be documented and maintained in an orderly fashion to support grant activity. Effect: Grants could be improperly reported or not reported without proper controls. In addition, compliance issues could arise due to lack of controls. Recommendation: We recommend proper controls be established for gathering and maintaining grant documentation and the preparation of the Schedule of Federal and State Awards.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2019-005: Improper Controls over Grant Transactions Condition: The City did not maintain grant files in a systematic manner to appropriately identify grant activity. Various grants are handled by two employees within the City in addition to the Police department handling their grants. The City does not prepare the Schedule of Federal and State Awards. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that systematic proper supporting documentation be maintained for grant activity. The Uniform Guidance also dictates that the City is responsible for preparing the Schedule of Federal and State Awards. Cause: Controls do not exist which require all grant information to be documented and maintained in an orderly fashion to support grant activity. Effect: Grants could be improperly reported or not reported without proper controls. In addition, compliance issues could arise due to lack of controls. Recommendation: We recommend proper controls be established for gathering and maintaining grant documentation and the preparation of the Schedule of Federal and State Awards.
Management Response: The responsibility of grants has been assigned to the Finance Department. The City Recorder will oversee and maintain grant documentation.
2018-007
FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2019 — management decision was due September 27, 2019.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2017-001
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FAC accepted this audit on March 8, 2018 — management decision was due September 8, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2016-001
FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2017 — management decision was due September 27, 2017.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2015-001
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Tennessee →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.