← Back to home

Grant County School DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 616001380

UEI: SLWFEA6B4DF3

Audited by: White and Associates, PSC.

Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

Grant County School District10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$6.8M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$6,828,986 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on April 1, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 1, 2026 (17 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →

FY 2024-06-30

$7,945,673 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 13, 2024 — management decision was due June 13, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$10,390,542 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 15, 2023 — management decision was due June 15, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,792,472 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 12, 2023 — management decision was due July 12, 2023.

2022-020
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

SECTION III ? FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COST 2022-02 ? Controls surrounding payroll Criteria: The District is responsible for establishing and following controls that prevent, detect and correct errors in a timely manner. Condition and Context: During the course of the audit, we identified errors in controls surrounding payroll that was not identified and rectified by the district. The errors resulted in one employee being overpaid and another employee being underpaid. A technology error led to one employee being underpaid, and a timecard error led to another employee being overpaid. Effect: Error in payments of wages that did not match a timecard and an employee?s contracted rate. Cause: Lack of review of internal controls surrounding payroll, including reviewing timecards and the MUNIS system for payroll discrepancies. Recommendation: Secondary review of payroll internal controls in conjunction with the normal payroll process, ensuring that employees are paid the appropriate amount each pay period. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District office will review internal controls surrounding payroll to ensure that pay to employees is in conjunction with contracted rates and weekly timecards.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

SECTION III ? FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COST 2022-02 ? Controls surrounding payroll Criteria: The District is responsible for establishing and following controls that prevent, detect and correct errors in a timely manner. Condition and Context: During the course of the audit, we identified errors in controls surrounding payroll that was not identified and rectified by the district. The errors resulted in one employee being overpaid and another employee being underpaid. A technology error led to one employee being underpaid, and a timecard error led to another employee being overpaid. Effect: Error in payments of wages that did not match a timecard and an employee?s contracted rate. Cause: Lack of review of internal controls surrounding payroll, including reviewing timecards and the MUNIS system for payroll discrepancies. Recommendation: Secondary review of payroll internal controls in conjunction with the normal payroll process, ensuring that employees are paid the appropriate amount each pay period. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District office will review internal controls surrounding payroll to ensure that pay to employees is in conjunction with contracted rates and weekly timecards.

Corrective Action Plan

Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District office will review internal controls surrounding payroll to ensure that pay to employees is in conjunction with contracted rates and weekly timecards.

About Other →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,203,418 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 9, 2021 — management decision was due June 9, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,945,676 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 15, 2020 — management decision was due June 15, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,716,252 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 12, 2020 — management decision was due July 12, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,571,229 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 12, 2018 — management decision was due June 12, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,391,868 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 30, 2017 — management decision was due May 30, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,239,368 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 6, 2016 — management decision was due June 6, 2017.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Kentucky

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.