← Back to home

SHELBY COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTLocal Government

EIN: 616001356

UEI: MZ3EVRJQ6MD1

Audited by: Montgomery and Company, PLLC

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

SHELBY COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT10 audit years2 findings
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$10.3M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$10,331,883 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on February 9, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 9, 2026 (25 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$10,721,268 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 4, 2024 — management decision was due June 4, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$14,915,264 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 22, 2024 — management decision was due July 22, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$16,485,641 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 21, 2022 — management decision was due May 21, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,989,055 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 8, 2021 — management decision was due June 8, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,863,454 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 11, 2021 — management decision was due July 11, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,652,769 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

2019-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

CONDITION: 1. THE DISTRICT SELECTED THE WRONG NUMBER OF APPLICATIONS TO TEST. 2. THE DISTRICT DID NOT MAKE PROPER DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY BASED ON THE DATA PRESENTED. STATEMENT OF CAUSE: THE DISTRICT INCORRECTLY INCLUDED APPLICATIONS THAT HAD BEEN DENIED IN THE NUMBER OF APPLICATION WHEN DETERMING THE NUMBER TO VERIFY. THE DISTRICT DID NOT CONSIDER OVERTIME EARNED ON A REGULAR BASIS IN THE EARNINGS CALCULATION. POSSIBLE ASSETED EFFECT: THE EFFECT OF THE TWO ERRORS RESULTED IN MORE APPLICATIONS BEING VERIFIED THAN REQUIRED, AND THE DISTRICT COLLECTED $319 MORE IN FEDERAL REIMBURSEMENT THAN ALLOWED ON THE APPLICATION THAT WAS IMPROPERLY DETERMINED TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED MEALS. QUESTIONED COSTS: THE DISTRICT COLLECTED $319 MORE IN FEDERAL REIMBURSEMENT THAN ALLOWED. THE AMOUNT WAS DETERMINED BY MULTIPLYING THE ALLOWED RATE FOR EACH MEAL BY THE NUMBER OF MEALS EATEN BY THE STUDENT AFTER THE DETERMINATION DATE.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

CONDITION: 1. THE DISTRICT SELECTED THE WRONG NUMBER OF APPLICATIONS TO TEST. 2. THE DISTRICT DID NOT MAKE PROPER DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY BASED ON THE DATA PRESENTED. STATEMENT OF CAUSE: THE DISTRICT INCORRECTLY INCLUDED APPLICATIONS THAT HAD BEEN DENIED IN THE NUMBER OF APPLICATION WHEN DETERMING THE NUMBER TO VERIFY. THE DISTRICT DID NOT CONSIDER OVERTIME EARNED ON A REGULAR BASIS IN THE EARNINGS CALCULATION. POSSIBLE ASSETED EFFECT: THE EFFECT OF THE TWO ERRORS RESULTED IN MORE APPLICATIONS BEING VERIFIED THAN REQUIRED, AND THE DISTRICT COLLECTED $319 MORE IN FEDERAL REIMBURSEMENT THAN ALLOWED ON THE APPLICATION THAT WAS IMPROPERLY DETERMINED TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED MEALS. QUESTIONED COSTS: THE DISTRICT COLLECTED $319 MORE IN FEDERAL REIMBURSEMENT THAN ALLOWED. THE AMOUNT WAS DETERMINED BY MULTIPLYING THE ALLOWED RATE FOR EACH MEAL BY THE NUMBER OF MEALS EATEN BY THE STUDENT AFTER THE DETERMINATION DATE.

Corrective Action Plan

THE FOOD SERVICE MANAGTER WILL PARTICIPATE IN TRAINING OFFERED RELATIVE TO THE VERIFICATION PROCESS. THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER WILL VERIFY THE CORRECT NUMBER OF APPLICATIONS TO BE VERIFIED. THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER WILL VERIFY ELIGIBILITY WAS PROPERLY DETERMINED FOR THE APPLICATIONS SELECTED FOR VERIFICATION. ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE 06/30/2020

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,656,660 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 27, 2018 — management decision was due May 27, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,761,244 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 27, 2017 — management decision was due May 27, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,616,608 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 14, 2016 — management decision was due May 14, 2017.

2016-001
Other
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Other →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Kentucky

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.