← Back to home

GRAVES COUNTY FISCAL COURTLocal Government

EIN: 616000872

UEI: JFPGLJH8L183

Audited by: MIKE HARMON, AUDITOR OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS

Oversight agency: 97 [Department of Homeland Security]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

GRAVES COUNTY FISCAL COURT4 audit years1 findings
4
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$796.2K
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2022)

FY 2022-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$796,210 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on July 26, 2023. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by January 26, 2024 (949 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2021-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,725,504 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 12, 2022 — management decision was due March 12, 2023.

2021-007
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

The Graves County Fiscal Court Submitted Unsubstantiated Jail Payroll Costs For Reimbursement From The Coronavirus Relief Fund And Lacks Internal Control Over Jail Payroll The Graves County Fiscal Court submitted unsubstantiated jail payroll expenses for reimbursement from the Coronavirus Relief Fund (the Fund) administered by the Commonwealth of Kentucky?s Department for Local Government (DLG) during fiscal year 2021. Two of the three reimbursement requests the fiscal court sent to DLG, that included jail payroll costs, were tested. Testing of these two reimbursement requests yielded that five jail employees did not keep timesheets. There were also two instances where jail employees? timesheets did not match their payroll summaries, there were 44 instances where jail employees did not sign their timesheet to indicate the time reported was time they worked, and there were 55 instances where jail employees tested did not have adequate supervisor approval. Three instances were also found where sheriff?s office employees didn?t document their approval of their timesheets. Questioned costs of $55,302 were computed based on the two months of unsubstantiated salary charges for five employees that did not keep timesheets, and the two employees whose timesheets did not match the December 2020 payroll summary These issues are due to a weakness in the jailer?s payroll procedures. The jailer has given authority for a signature stamp to be used by his office staff to approve timesheets when he is not there. The signature stamp does not have controls in place to document who is using it, so supervisor approval cannot be determined. Furthermore, the jailer did not require salaried employees to keep timesheets. The two employees? timesheets that did not match were due to an error made when processing December payroll which was quickly fixed in January; however, it was reimbursed improperly as the hours were not worked during the time period agreed by the grant. Due to the jail having weak payroll procedures, questioned costs were generated and the risk of improperly paying employees is elevated. Strong internal controls require documented approval of timesheets by both the direct supervisor and the employee. This will protect both parties by ensuring that an employee?s hours worked are accurate and agreed upon by both the employee and the office. 2 CFR 200.303 states: ?The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.? Additionally, KRS 337.320(1) states, in part, ?[e]very employer shall keep a record of: (a) The amount paid each pay period to each employee; (b) The hours worked each day and each week by each employee[.]? We recommend the Graves County Fiscal Court implement internal controls over federal award reimbursements and the jail?s payroll. Reimbursement request should be properly supported prior to submission. The fiscal court should require the jail strengthen their internal controls over timekeeping records which includes employees? signature on timesheets as well as documented approval of all timesheets. Any deviations should be investigated and cleared prior to processing payroll .

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

The Graves County Fiscal Court Submitted Unsubstantiated Jail Payroll Costs For Reimbursement From The Coronavirus Relief Fund And Lacks Internal Control Over Jail Payroll The Graves County Fiscal Court submitted unsubstantiated jail payroll expenses for reimbursement from the Coronavirus Relief Fund (the Fund) administered by the Commonwealth of Kentucky?s Department for Local Government (DLG) during fiscal year 2021. Two of the three reimbursement requests the fiscal court sent to DLG, that included jail payroll costs, were tested. Testing of these two reimbursement requests yielded that five jail employees did not keep timesheets. There were also two instances where jail employees? timesheets did not match their payroll summaries, there were 44 instances where jail employees did not sign their timesheet to indicate the time reported was time they worked, and there were 55 instances where jail employees tested did not have adequate supervisor approval. Three instances were also found where sheriff?s office employees didn?t document their approval of their timesheets. Questioned costs of $55,302 were computed based on the two months of unsubstantiated salary charges for five employees that did not keep timesheets, and the two employees whose timesheets did not match the December 2020 payroll summary These issues are due to a weakness in the jailer?s payroll procedures. The jailer has given authority for a signature stamp to be used by his office staff to approve timesheets when he is not there. The signature stamp does not have controls in place to document who is using it, so supervisor approval cannot be determined. Furthermore, the jailer did not require salaried employees to keep timesheets. The two employees? timesheets that did not match were due to an error made when processing December payroll which was quickly fixed in January; however, it was reimbursed improperly as the hours were not worked during the time period agreed by the grant. Due to the jail having weak payroll procedures, questioned costs were generated and the risk of improperly paying employees is elevated. Strong internal controls require documented approval of timesheets by both the direct supervisor and the employee. This will protect both parties by ensuring that an employee?s hours worked are accurate and agreed upon by both the employee and the office. 2 CFR 200.303 states: ?The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.? Additionally, KRS 337.320(1) states, in part, ?[e]very employer shall keep a record of: (a) The amount paid each pay period to each employee; (b) The hours worked each day and each week by each employee[.]? We recommend the Graves County Fiscal Court implement internal controls over federal award reimbursements and the jail?s payroll. Reimbursement request should be properly supported prior to submission. The fiscal court should require the jail strengthen their internal controls over timekeeping records which includes employees? signature on timesheets as well as documented approval of all timesheets. Any deviations should be investigated and cleared prior to processing payroll .

Corrective Action Plan

Prepared by: Codie Courtney, County Treasurer Date Prepared: June 27, 2022 Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan: Graves County Jailer Anticipated Completion Date: Completed Official's Response: Graves County was able to work with the Department for Local Government for payroll that was supported to according to the 2020 Coronavirus Relief Fund 21.019, 2020 C-070 and C2-280 guidelines. The issue of signed timesheets for all employees has also been reconciled as of May 2022. Jailer?s Response: We were unaware that salaried employees needed to maintain a timesheet for fiscal court, that has since been taken care of.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2020-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$2,052,639 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 11, 2022 — management decision was due February 11, 2023.

FY 2019-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,022,109 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 11, 2022 — management decision was due February 11, 2023.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Kentucky

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.