← Back to home

Prestonsburg City's Utilities CommissionLocal Government

EIN: 616000545

UEI: LQH1FM9N7ZQ6

Audited by: Jones & Associates CPAs, PSC

Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

Prestonsburg City's Utilities Commission2 audit years2 findings
2
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$967.1K
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$967,051 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 5, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 5, 2026 (89 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2019-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,138,421 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 18, 2020 — management decision was due September 18, 2020.

2019-007
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Cash Management / Equipment & Real Property / Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking / Period of Performance / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESSOTHER MATTERS

Auditor discovered the receipt of federal funds in the amount of $1,138,421 during examination of other audit areas. Questioned Costs: The Commission relies on a grant administrator to approve costs. No questioned costs were found during testing. Cause: The Commission does not have policies and procedures in place related to federal awards to ensure that proper records are kept. Effect: The Commission would have been noncompliant with their grant requirements if a Single Audit had not been performed in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: We recommend that the Commission make note of the source of all funds received and educate themselves on the requirements of those funds. Management should track separately all federal funds which could be subject to a Single Audit according to the Uniform Guidance. Response: We agree with the auditor?s comment. We have taken measures to track any funds received so we can fully correct this issue.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Management was not aware that the Commission had received federal funds which would require a Single Audit in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Condition: Auditor discovered the receipt of federal funds in the amount of $1,138,421 during examination of other audit areas. Questioned Costs: The Commission relies on a grant administrator to approve costs. No questioned costs were found during testing. Cause: The Commission does not have policies and procedures in place related to federal awards to ensure that proper records are kept. Effect: The Commission would have been noncompliant with their grant requirements if a Single Audit had not been performed in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: We recommend that the Commission make note of the source of all funds received and educate themselves on the requirements of those funds. Management should track separately all federal funds which could be subject to a Single Audit according to the Uniform Guidance. Response: We agree with the auditor?s comment. We have taken measures to track any funds received so we can fully correct this issue.

Corrective Action Plan

Recommendation: We recommend that the Commission make note of the source of all funds received and educate themselves on the requirements of those funds. Management should track separately all federal funds which could be subject to a Single Audit according to the Uniform Guidance. Response: We agree with the auditor?s comment. We have taken measures to track any funds received so we can fully correct this issue. Status: Corrected Implementation Date: December 2019

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Cash Management, Equipment and Real Property Management, Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking, Period of Performance, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2019-008
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Cash Management / Equipment & Real Property / Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking / Period of Performance / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Auditor discovered the receipt of federal funds in the amount of $1,138,421 during examination of other audit areas. Management had not prepared a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for these funds. Questioned Costs: The Commission relies on a grant administrator to approve costs. No questioned costs were found during testing. Cause: The Commission does not have policies and procedures in place related to federal awards to ensure that proper records are kept and appropriate documentation made of federal awards. Effect: The Commission was noncompliant with the grant requirements which required a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards to be prepared in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: We recommend that the Commission make note of the source of all funds received and educate themselves on the requirements of those funds. Management should prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for all funds that came from federal sources. Response: We agree with the auditor?s comment. We have taken measures to track any funds received or expended so that we can fully correct this issue.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Management was not aware that they were required to prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Condition: Auditor discovered the receipt of federal funds in the amount of $1,138,421 during examination of other audit areas. Management had not prepared a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for these funds. Questioned Costs: The Commission relies on a grant administrator to approve costs. No questioned costs were found during testing. Cause: The Commission does not have policies and procedures in place related to federal awards to ensure that proper records are kept and appropriate documentation made of federal awards. Effect: The Commission was noncompliant with the grant requirements which required a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards to be prepared in accordance with the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: We recommend that the Commission make note of the source of all funds received and educate themselves on the requirements of those funds. Management should prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for all funds that came from federal sources. Response: We agree with the auditor?s comment. We have taken measures to track any funds received or expended so that we can fully correct this issue.

Corrective Action Plan

Recommendation: We recommend that the Commission make note of the source of all funds received and educate themselves on the requirements of those funds. Management should prepare a Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards for all funds that came from federal sources. Response: We agree with the auditor?s comment, we have taken measures to track any funds received or expended so we can fully correct this issue. Status: Corrected Implementation Date: December 2019

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Cash Management, Equipment and Real Property Management, Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking, Period of Performance, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Kentucky

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.