← Back to home

MESA SUPPORTIVE HOUSING, INC.Non-Profit

EIN: 611534302

UEI: SJURQCK9NNT1

Audited by: BAKER MEINZ & ASSOCIATES, LTD

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

MESA SUPPORTIVE HOUSING, INC.10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.9M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$1,944,953 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on October 30, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by April 30, 2026 (124 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

The Project overpaid management fees to the management company. Criteria: The management company should calculate management fees using the correct formula. Effect: The Project's management fee expense is overstated. Context: The management fee for the year was tested for accuracy. Through testing, it was determined that the total cash receipts number used to calculate management fee was overstated. The details and results of the sample are as follows: Population - N/A, Dollars - $11,387; Sample - N/A, Dollars - $11,387; Not in Compliance - N/A, Dollars $11,387; Questioned Costs - $30; Cause: The management company did not compute the management fee correctly. Recommendation: The management company should repay the $30 to the Project. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Project agrees with the finding. The management company will repay the management fee overpayment as soon as possible. Total-Department of Housing and Urban Development - $30; Non-compliance code - J

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FINDING 2025-001: SECTION 811, ASSISTANCE LISTING NUMBER 14.181 Condition: The Project overpaid management fees to the management company. Criteria: The management company should calculate management fees using the correct formula. Effect: The Project's management fee expense is overstated. Context: The management fee for the year was tested for accuracy. Through testing, it was determined that the total cash receipts number used to calculate management fee was overstated. The details and results of the sample are as follows: Population - N/A, Dollars - $11,387; Sample - N/A, Dollars - $11,387; Not in Compliance - N/A, Dollars $11,387; Questioned Costs - $30; Cause: The management company did not compute the management fee correctly. Recommendation: The management company should repay the $30 to the Project. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Project agrees with the finding. The management company will repay the management fee overpayment as soon as possible. Total-Department of Housing and Urban Development - $30; Non-compliance code - J

Corrective Action Plan

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FINDING 2025-001: SECTION 811, ASSISTANCE LISTING NUMBER 14.181 Condition: The Project overpaid management fees to the management company. Recommendation: The management company should repay the $30 to the Project. Action Taken: The Project agrees with the finding. The management company will repay the overpaid management fees as soon as possible. If the Department of Housing and Urban Development has questions regarding this plan, please call Ling Han at 651-645-7271.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2024-06-30

$1,935,266 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 11, 2024 — management decision was due June 11, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

$1,939,502 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 16, 2024 — management decision was due August 16, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

$1,943,645 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 28, 2023 — management decision was due August 28, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

$1,943,325 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 14, 2021 — management decision was due June 14, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

$1,937,643 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 20, 2020 — management decision was due June 20, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

$1,928,779 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 18, 2019 — management decision was due May 18, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

$1,931,578 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 28, 2018 — management decision was due May 28, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

$1,928,469 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 30, 2018 — management decision was due July 30, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

$1,930,355 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 14, 2017 — management decision was due September 14, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Minnesota

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.