EIN: 611337500
UEI: M6QSB1UX68B4
Audited by: Deming, Malone, Livesay & Ostroff
Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 14, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 30, 2026 (15 days from today).
What is a management decision? →Certain tenant rent calculated on the Form 50059 and reported to HUD is inaccurate due to the use of incorrect income calculations. Documentation to support tenant eligibility was not maintained in tenant files. Incorrect model leases were used for multiple tenants. Cause of Condition: The Project’s internal controls to ensure that tenant files are complete and required documentation for tenant eligibility screening is maintained, that the correct model leases are used, and that the calculation of tenant rent is accurate were not effective. Effect of Condition: Of the three tenant files sampled for the Project, we noted discrepancies between the information reported on the Form 50059 and the information in the tenant file for the income reported for one tenant. This resulted in the tenant underpaying their share of the monthly rent by $46 per month and HUD being overcharged by the same amount. We also noted that for all three tenants various documents to support eligibility screening were not maintained in the tenant files. For one of the three tenant files sampled, the incorrect model lease was used. Recommendation: The design of the current internal controls should be reviewed to ensure tenant files are complete and accurate. The information in the files should support the data used in preparing the Form 50059, and procedures for calculating income using HUD guidelines should be reviewed. The information in the files should also support that proper eligibility screening procedures have been completed, and updated lease agreements should be obtained for any tenant whose lease is not the correct model lease document. A corrected Form 50059 should be prepared to correct the tenant income discrepancy noted in the audit, and the required adjustment processed through the HUD voucher. In addition, management should review all files and report any additional discrepancies to HUD in a timely manner. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the findings and will implement procedures to ensure tenant files are maintained in accordance with HUD guidelines and that tenant rent is calculated using accurate data under HUD guidelines. Corrected Form 50059s will be prepared and any necessary adjustments will be processed in a timely manner.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2025-002: FALN 14.181 – Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities – Significant Deficiency Criteria: The Project’s tenant files are required to be maintained in accordance with HUD guidelines to ensure tenant eligibility and accurate calculations of tenant rent and rental subsidy. The Project is also required to use the most current lease agreement for Section 811 when certifying or re-certifying tenants. Statement of Condition: Certain tenant rent calculated on the Form 50059 and reported to HUD is inaccurate due to the use of incorrect income calculations. Documentation to support tenant eligibility was not maintained in tenant files. Incorrect model leases were used for multiple tenants. Cause of Condition: The Project’s internal controls to ensure that tenant files are complete and required documentation for tenant eligibility screening is maintained, that the correct model leases are used, and that the calculation of tenant rent is accurate were not effective. Effect of Condition: Of the three tenant files sampled for the Project, we noted discrepancies between the information reported on the Form 50059 and the information in the tenant file for the income reported for one tenant. This resulted in the tenant underpaying their share of the monthly rent by $46 per month and HUD being overcharged by the same amount. We also noted that for all three tenants various documents to support eligibility screening were not maintained in the tenant files. For one of the three tenant files sampled, the incorrect model lease was used. Recommendation: The design of the current internal controls should be reviewed to ensure tenant files are complete and accurate. The information in the files should support the data used in preparing the Form 50059, and procedures for calculating income using HUD guidelines should be reviewed. The information in the files should also support that proper eligibility screening procedures have been completed, and updated lease agreements should be obtained for any tenant whose lease is not the correct model lease document. A corrected Form 50059 should be prepared to correct the tenant income discrepancy noted in the audit, and the required adjustment processed through the HUD voucher. In addition, management should review all files and report any additional discrepancies to HUD in a timely manner. View of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the findings and will implement procedures to ensure tenant files are maintained in accordance with HUD guidelines and that tenant rent is calculated using accurate data under HUD guidelines. Corrected Form 50059s will be prepared and any necessary adjustments will be processed in a timely manner.
Recommendation: The design of the current internal controls should be reviewed to ensure tenant files are complete and accurate. The information in the files should support the data used in preparing the Form 50059, and procedures for calculating income using HUD guidelines should be reviewed. The information in the files should also support that proper eligibility screening procedures have been completed, and updated lease agreements should be obtained for any tenant whose lease is not the correct model lease document. A corrected Form 50059 should be prepared to correct the tenant income discrepancy noted in the audit, and the required adjustment processed through the HUD voucher. In addition, management should review all files and report any additional discrepancies to HUD in a timely manner. Action Taken: Day Spring Baxter Avenue, Inc. will review all tenant files and report any discrepancies in calculated tenant rent and rental subsidy to HUD and make the necessary adjustments on the 50059 forms as soon as possible. Tenant files will be reviewed to ensure proper documentation is maintained and the proper model lease is being used.
FAC accepted this audit on October 5, 2023 — management decision was due April 5, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on October 11, 2022 — management decision was due April 11, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on October 5, 2021 — management decision was due April 5, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on October 25, 2020 — management decision was due April 25, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on October 29, 2019 — management decision was due April 29, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2018 — management decision was due May 19, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on January 17, 2018 — management decision was due July 17, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on October 25, 2016 — management decision was due April 25, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Kentucky →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
