← Back to home

LEXINGTON CENTER CORPORATIONNon-Profit

EIN: 610734772

UEI: D5HLSGYJ28H8

Audited by: RFH PLLC

Oversight agency: 59 [Small Business Administration]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

LEXINGTON CENTER CORPORATION1 audit years1 findings
1
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$800.2K
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2022)

FY 2022-06-30

$800,229 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on October 12, 2022. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by April 12, 2023 (1240 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2022-002
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

While the Lexington Center Corporation had more than sufficient qualifying costs in excess of the federal award amount, personnel costs previously credited through the Employee Retention Credit (ERC) were coded to the federal award. Pursuant to section 3134(h)(1)(B) and (C) of the Internal Revenue Code, employers may not treat qualified wages used in connection with the ERC also for the Shuttered Venue Operators Grant. Cause: The Lexington Center Corporation did not have policies and procedures over cost principles establishing the allowability of certain items of costs in accordance with allocability standards. Effect: Noncompliance such as unallowable costs charged to the federal award could occur and not be detected or corrected. Audit Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures over the administration of federal awards, including establishing written policies and procedures to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance cost principles. Management?s Response: Federal awards received by Lexington Center Corporation spanned the course of two and half years and a major change in management from in-house to a private management company. The expenses submitted under the ERC were done so prior to Oak View Group management, with the expenses submitted under the SVOG overlapping the two management regimes. Management has sufficient qualifying costs for corrective action in this particular circumstance and will be identifying controls that ensure corrective action will not be needed in future circumstances.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 200.303 requires that nonfederal entities receiving federal awards establish and maintain internal over federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. The organization should have internal controls to ensure that costs charged to federal awards comply with the cost principles contained in Subpart E ? Cost Principles (2 CFR 200.400). Condition: While the Lexington Center Corporation had more than sufficient qualifying costs in excess of the federal award amount, personnel costs previously credited through the Employee Retention Credit (ERC) were coded to the federal award. Pursuant to section 3134(h)(1)(B) and (C) of the Internal Revenue Code, employers may not treat qualified wages used in connection with the ERC also for the Shuttered Venue Operators Grant. Cause: The Lexington Center Corporation did not have policies and procedures over cost principles establishing the allowability of certain items of costs in accordance with allocability standards. Effect: Noncompliance such as unallowable costs charged to the federal award could occur and not be detected or corrected. Audit Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures over the administration of federal awards, including establishing written policies and procedures to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance cost principles. Management?s Response: Federal awards received by Lexington Center Corporation spanned the course of two and half years and a major change in management from in-house to a private management company. The expenses submitted under the ERC were done so prior to Oak View Group management, with the expenses submitted under the SVOG overlapping the two management regimes. Management has sufficient qualifying costs for corrective action in this particular circumstance and will be identifying controls that ensure corrective action will not be needed in future circumstances.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding no: 2022-002 Contact person(s) responsible: Jeff Mullaney, Director of Finance Corrective action planned: It will be policy moving forward that primary contact person(s) for federal awards shall remain consistent from receipt of award to close of said award. This will increase control over award documentation and uses of funds. Additionally, a staff member who is not the primary contact for the federal award will perform an independent review of costs at each stage of the award reporting process to provide additional checks and balances. As it relates to the specific federal award in this audit period, management will replace unallowable costs with available allowable costs. Anticipated completion date: October 1, 2022

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Kentucky

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.